CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Comparison of AODV and DSR On-demand Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

by Prem Chand, M. K. Soni
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 49 - Number 18
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Prem Chand, M. K. Soni
10.5120/7724-1116

Prem Chand, M. K. Soni . Performance Comparison of AODV and DSR On-demand Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 49, 18 ( July 2012), 1-5. DOI=10.5120/7724-1116

@article{ 10.5120/7724-1116,
author = { Prem Chand, M. K. Soni },
title = { Performance Comparison of AODV and DSR On-demand Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { July 2012 },
volume = { 49 },
number = { 18 },
month = { July },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-5 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume49/number18/7724-1116/ },
doi = { 10.5120/7724-1116 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:46:32.093519+05:30
%A Prem Chand
%A M. K. Soni
%T Performance Comparison of AODV and DSR On-demand Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 49
%N 18
%P 1-5
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is a collection of mobile wireless nodes, which communication to each other without any centralized control. These networks are characterized by a lack of infrastructure, and by a random and quickly changing network topology: thus the call for a strong dynamic routing protocol that can accommodate in such an environment is generated. In addition to this, routing protocols face many challenges like short battery backup, limited processing capability. This paper is an effort to study the performance of two on-demand routing protocols (AODV and DSR) in terms of number of routes selected, number of hop counts, number of RREQ packets and number of RREP packets. Simulation on QualNet shows that AODV compared with DSR reduces the number of hop count nodes, and AODV has less number of routes as compared to DSR, which helps AODV to be more efficient and less bulky. While comparing route request packets AODV is again better by having more number of RREQ packets as compared to DSR which made it more efficient in finding a new route and each time in replacing a stale link.

References
  1. C. E. Perkins and E. M. Royer (1999): "Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing," Proc. 2nd IEEE Wksp. Mobile Comp. Sys. and Apps. , pp. 90–100.
  2. M. Joa-Ng and I. T. Lu (1999): "A Peer-to-Peer Zone-Based Two-Level Link State Routing for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks". IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1415- 1425.
  3. Hao Yang, Haiyun Luo. Fan Ye, Songwu Lu, and Lixia Zhang. "Security in mobile ad hoc networks: Challenges and solutions". IEEE Wireless Communications, February 2004
  4. Charles E. Perkins and Pravin Bhagwat(1994): "Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers". Proceedings of the SIGCOMM '94 Conference on Communications Architectures, Protocols and Applications, pages 234–244,
  5. C. C. Chiang, H. K. Wu, W. Liu and M. Gerla(1997): "Routing in Clustered Multi-Hop Mobile Wireless Networks with Fading Channel". Proceedings of IEEE SICON 1997, pp. 197-211.
  6. P. Johansson, T. Larsson, N. Hedman, B. Mielczare, M. Degermark: "Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks", In Proc. of the ACM/IEEE MobiCom. (August 1999).
  7. T. H. Clausen, G. Hansen, L. Christensen, and G. Behrmann(2001): "The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol, Evaluation through Experiments and Simulation", Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Wireless Personal Mobile Communications .
  8. A. Iwata, C. C. Chiang, G. Pei, M. Gerla, and T. W. Chen(1999): Scalable Routing Strategies for Ad-hoc Wireless Networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1369-1379.
  9. T. W. Chen and M. Gerla, (1998): "Global State Routing: A New Routing Scheme for Ad- hoc Wireless Networks", Proceedings of IEEE ICC, pp. 171-175.
  10. Charles Perkins and Elizabeth Royer(1999): "Ad-hoc on- demand distance vector routing". In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pages 90–100.
  11. C. K. Toh,(1997): "Associativity-Based Routing for Ad- hoc Mobile Networks". Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-36.
  12. L. Chen and W. B. Heinzelman, "QoS-Aware Routing Based on Bandwidth Estimation for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks," IEEE J. Selected Areas in Comm. , vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 561-572, Mar. 2005.
  13. Smt Rajashree. V. Biradar & Prof V. C. Patil : Classification and Comparison of routing Techniques in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks, in the proceedings of international Symposium on Adhoc Ubiquitous Computing (ISHUC'06), pp. 7-11 (2006).
  14. C. E. Perkins, S. R. Das, and E. Royer, "Ad-hoc on Demand DistanceVector (AODV)". March 2000, http://www. ietf. org/internal-drafts/draft-ietf-manet-aodv-05. txt
  15. R. S. Sisodia, B. S. Manoj, and C. Siva Ram Murthy(2002): "A Preferred Link-Based Routing Protocol for Ad-hoc Wireless Networks". Journal of Communications and Networks, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14-21.
  16. P. Sinha, R. Sivakumar, and V. Bharghavan(1999), "CEDAR: A Core Extraction Distributed Ad-hoc Routing Algorithm". IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1454-1466.
  17. Z. . J. Haas (1997): "The Routing Algorithm for the Reconfigurable Wireless networks", Proceedings of ICUPC 1997, vol. 2, pp. 562-566.
  18. Rohit Dube, Cynthia D. Rais, Kuang-Yeh Wang, and Satish K. Tripathi(1997): "Signal Stability-Based Adaptive Routing (SSA) for Ad-hoc Mobile Networks. " IEEE Personal Communications, 4(1):36–45.
  19. Y. C. Hu and D. Johnson (2000), "Caching Strategies in On-demand Routing Protocols for Wireless Ad-hoc Networks," Proc. IEEE/ACM MOBICOM '00, pp. 231–42.
  20. David A. Maltz, Josh Broch, Jorjeta Jetcheva, and David B. Johnson(1999): "The Effects of On-Demand Behavior in Routing Protocols for Multi-Hop Wireless Ad-hoc Networks". IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communications, 17(8):1439–1453.
  21. Robert Castaneda and Samir R. Das(1999): "Query Localization Techniques for On-demand Routing Protocols in Ad-hoc Networks". In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'99). ACM.
  22. S. R. Das(1998): "Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad- hoc Networks," 7th Int'l Conf. Comp. Commun. and Networks, pp. 153–61.
  23. Hanzo,II, L. , Tafazolli, R. , 2006, "Quality of Service Routing and Admission Control for Mobile Ad-hoc networks with a contention-based MAC Layer", IEEE International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems, 9-12 October, 501-504.
  24. Per Johansson, Tony Larsson, Nicklas Hedman, Bartosz Mielczarek, and Mikael Degermark. Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks—A Comparative Performance Analysis. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'99). ACM, August 1999.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Ad-hoc networks Performance AODV DSR Routing protocols