CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Challenges to Development of Standard Software Quality Model

by Simrandeep Singh Thapar, Paramjeet Singh, Shaveta Rani
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 49 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Simrandeep Singh Thapar, Paramjeet Singh, Shaveta Rani
10.5120/7660-0765

Simrandeep Singh Thapar, Paramjeet Singh, Shaveta Rani . Challenges to Development of Standard Software Quality Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 49, 10 ( July 2012), 1-7. DOI=10.5120/7660-0765

@article{ 10.5120/7660-0765,
author = { Simrandeep Singh Thapar, Paramjeet Singh, Shaveta Rani },
title = { Challenges to Development of Standard Software Quality Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { July 2012 },
volume = { 49 },
number = { 10 },
month = { July },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-7 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume49/number10/7660-0765/ },
doi = { 10.5120/7660-0765 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:45:53.743943+05:30
%A Simrandeep Singh Thapar
%A Paramjeet Singh
%A Shaveta Rani
%T Challenges to Development of Standard Software Quality Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 49
%N 10
%P 1-7
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

To stay ahead in competition, software organizations have to deliver required functionality consistently guaranteed with high quality. The quality expectations of customers at purchase time from the software is the major reason of emergent attention of software organizations to implement quality management in software development. Nowadays, use of Component Based Software Development (CBSD) approach is considered success factor for business because of its underlying benefits like reusability, on-time delivery, high quality, and less cost. But success of CBSD depends upon the quality of components used. Many quality models have been proposed to provide high quality products, some of these are for general usage and others are for specific applications or domains. These specific purpose models are improved or modified forms of basic quality models especially ISO 9126. This paper presents key challenges or deterrents to the development of standard, complete and pervasive software quality models, solution to these challenges and their importance is also discussed.

References
  1. Pressman, Roger S. 2001. Software Engineering: A practitioner's approach. McGraw-Hil, 5th ed.
  2. Kalaimagal, Sivamuni and Srinivasan, Rengaramanujam 2009. The Need for Transforming the COTS Component Quality Evaluation Standard Mirage to Reality. ACM SIGSOFT SEN 34, 5 (Sep. 2009), 1-4
  3. McCall, J. A. , Richards, P. K. , and Walters, G. F. 1977. Factors in Software Quality, Nat'l Tech. Information Service, no. Vol. 1, 2 and 3
  4. Boehm, B. W. , Brown, J. R. , Kaspar, J. R. , Lipow, M. L. & Mc Cleod, G. 1978. Characteristics of Software Quality. New York: American Elsevier
  5. Grady, R. B. 1992. Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1992
  6. Dromey, R. G. 1995. A model for software product quality. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 21, 146-162
  7. ISO/IEC. 2001a. ISO/IEC 9126-1 2001. Software Engineering-Software product quality-Part 1: Quality model. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization
  8. Bertoa, M. , Vallecillo, A. , 2002. Quality Attributes for COTS Components, The 6th International ECOOP Workshop on Quantitative Approaches in Object-Oriented Software Engineering (QAOOSE), Spain.
  9. Georgiadou, Elli 2003. GEQUAMO-A Generic, Multilayered, Customizable Software Quality model. Software Quality Control 11, 4 (November 2003), 313-323. DOI=10. 1023/A:1025817312035
  10. Ortega, M. , Perez, M. A. and Rojas, T. 2003. Construction of a systemic quality model for evaluating a software product. Software Quality Control 11, 3 (July 2003), 219-242. DOI=10. 1023/A:1025166710988
  11. Tendowicz, A. , Punter, T. 2003. Quality modeling for software product lines. In 7th ECOOP workshop on QAOOSE, 2003
  12. Khosravi, Khashayar and Gueheneuc, Yann-Gael 2005. On issues with software quality models. 9th ECOOP workshop on quantitative approaches in Object Oriented software engineering, Scotland, 70-83
  13. Rawashdeh Adnan and Matalkh Bassem 2006. A new software quality model for evaluating COTS components. Journal of computer science 2, 4, 373-381
  14. Andreu, Andreas S. and Tziakouris Marios 2007. A Quality Framework for Developing and Evaluating Original Software Components. Elsevier Journal of Information and Software Technology. 49 (2007), 122-141
  15. Sibisi, M. and Van Waveren, C. C. 2007. A Process Framework for Customizing Software Quality Models. 7th IEEE Conference in Africa. 1-8 DOI:10. 1109/AFRCON. 2007. 4401495
  16. Sharma Arun, Kumar Rajesh and Grover, P. S. 2008. Estimation of Quality for Software Components-An Empirical Approach. ACM SIGSOFT SEN 33, 6 (Nov. 2008), 1-10
  17. Behkamal Behshid, Kahani Mohsen, Akbari, Mohammad Kazem 2009. Customizing ISO 9126 Quality Model for Evaluation of B2B Applications. Journal of Information and Software Technology 51(2009), 599-609
  18. Srivastava, Praveen Ranjan and Kumar Krishan 2009. An Approach towards Software Quality Assessment. Third International Conference, ICISTM 2009 (Ghaziabad, India, March 12-13, 2009) 31, 6, 150-160 DOI: 10. 1007/978-3-642-00405-6_19
  19. Jamwal, Ranbireshwar S. and Jamwal Deepshikha 2009. Issues & Factors for evaluation of software quality models. In proceedings of the 3rd national conference Computing For Nation Development INDIACom-2009 (February 26 – 27, 2009) New Delhi
  20. Kumar Avadesh, Grover, P. S. and Kumar Rajesh 2009. A quantitative evaluation of Aspect-oriented software quality model (AOSQUAMO). ACM SIGSOFT SEN 34, 5 (Sep. 2009), 1-9
  21. Carvalho, F. Meira, S. R. L. 2009. Towards an Embedded Software Component Quality Verification Framework. In Proceedings of the 2009 14th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS '09). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 248-257. DOI=10. 1109/ICECCS. 2009. 26
  22. Bawane Neelam and Srikrishna, C. V. 2010. A Novel Method for Quantitative Assessment of Software Quality. International Journal of Computer Science and Security 3, 6, 508-517
  23. Alvaro Alexandre , E. S. de Almeida and S. R. de Lemos Meira 2010. A Software Component Quality Framework. ACM SIGSOFT SEN 35, 1(Nov. 2010), 1-18
  24. Kalaimangal Sivamuni and Srinivasan Rengaramanujam 2011. Q'Facto12- An improved quality model for COTS components. ACM SIGSOFT SEN 35, 2(Mar. 2010), 1-4
  25. Upadhyay Nitin, Despande, Bharat M. and Agrawal, Vishnu P. 2011. Towards a Software Component Quality Model. Springer Press CCIS ACST. 131, 3, 398-412 DOI: 10. 1007/978-3-642-17857-3_40
  26. Bassem Anas AL-Badareen 2011. Software Quality Evaluation: User's View. International Journal of applied mathematics and informatics 5, 3(2011), 200-207
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Quality Models CBSD Non-Functional Requirements Challenges

Powered by PhDFocusTM