CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Semantic Search using Ontology and RDBMS for Cricket

by S. M. Patil, D. M. Jadhav
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 46 - Number 14
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: S. M. Patil, D. M. Jadhav
10.5120/6978-9562

S. M. Patil, D. M. Jadhav . Semantic Search using Ontology and RDBMS for Cricket. International Journal of Computer Applications. 46, 14 ( May 2012), 26-31. DOI=10.5120/6978-9562

@article{ 10.5120/6978-9562,
author = { S. M. Patil, D. M. Jadhav },
title = { Semantic Search using Ontology and RDBMS for Cricket },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2012 },
volume = { 46 },
number = { 14 },
month = { May },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 26-31 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume46/number14/6978-9562/ },
doi = { 10.5120/6978-9562 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:39:43.641946+05:30
%A S. M. Patil
%A D. M. Jadhav
%T Semantic Search using Ontology and RDBMS for Cricket
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 46
%N 14
%P 26-31
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Ontology is being increasingly used for building the applications for the specific domain. Ontology enables users to capture the semantic of the documents. System performance is improved drastically by domain specific information extraction. To interpret information and perform reasoning, we need to store Ontologies in a way that is correct, consistent, scalable and efficient to retrieve. From the years, relational database technology has ensured the best facilities for updating, storing and manipulating the information of problem domain. RDBMS (Relational Database Management Systems) is the most efficient and reliable Data Structure in terms of storage and retrieval. One of the ways is to store Ontologies in RDBMS. To store OWL documents in RDBMS multiple techniques have been proposed, but they either deal with single ontology or they do not store complete semantics expressed in OWL ontologies. Some of the techniques are not really scalable, as the ontology is dynamic and extensible where as the RDBMS schema is not dynamically extensible. So, we need to store the OWL document in such a way that all the data should be stored and system is able to utilize the advantages of relational database. System defined tables are provided to store OWL ontology. Our approach enables users to reference the ontology data directly from SQL using semantic match operators. This paper focuses on semantic search based on ontology and RDBMS for cricket.

References
  1. David Vallet, Miriam Fernández, and Pablo Castells, "An Ontology-Based Information Retrieval Model" citeseers, 2005.
  2. Soner Kara, Ozgur Alan, Orkunt Sabuncu, Samet Akp?nar, Nihan K. Cicekli, Ferda N. Alpaslan, "An Ontology-Based Retrieval System Using Semantic Indexing", IEEE, ICDE workshop 2010.
  3. SparQL Protocol for RDF, K. Clark, Editor, W3C Recommendation, 15 January 2008, http://www. w3. org/TR/2008/REC- rdf-sparql-protocol-20080115.
  4. Adnan Khalid, Syed Adnan Hussain Shah, Muhammad Abdul Qadir, "OntRel: An Optimized Relational Structure for Storage of Dynamic OWL-DL Ontologies", 2009, International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition.
  5. Souripriya Das, Eugene Inseok Chong, George Eadon, Jagannathan Srinivasan, Oracle Corporation, "Supporting Ontology-based Semantic Matching in RDBMS", 2004, Proceedings of the 30th VLDB Conference, Toronto, Canada.
  6. Eugene Inseok Chong Souripriya Das George Eadon Jagannathan Srinivasan, "Supporting Keyword Columns with Ontology-based Referential Constraints in DBMS", 2006, IEEE, Proceedings of the 22nd ICDE Conference.
  7. "Introducing PelletDb (Expressive, Scalable Semantic Reasoning for the Enterprise)", 2009, Oracle white papers.
  8. Irina Astrova, Ahto Kalja, "Automatic Transformation Of Owl Ontologies To Sql Relational Databases", IADIS European Conference Data Ming 2007.
  9. R. Garcia, M. M. , A. Montes, J. F. "A Tool for Storing OWL Using Database Technology", (November 2005).
  10. Irina Astrova, Nahum Korda, and Ahto Kalja, "Storing OWL Ontologies in SQL Relational Databases", World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 29 2007.
  11. E. Vysniauskas, and L. Nemuraite, "Transforming ontology representation from OWL to relational database," Information Technology and Control, vol. 35A, no. 3, 2006.
  12. Jena, A. : Semantic Web Framework for Java, http://jena. sourceforge. net/ontology/index. html.
  13. G. Salton and M. J. McGill, "Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval", McGraw-Hill, 1983.
  14. Wen-tau Yih, "Template-based Information Extraction from Tree-structured HTML documents", Citeseer, 1997.
  15. Naveen Malviya, Nishchol Mishra, Santosh Sahu, "Developing University Ontology using protégé OWL Tool: Process and Reasoning", International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 2, Issue 9, September-2011.
  16. "Oracle Semantic Technologies Inference Best Practices with RDFS/OWL", 2009, Oracle White paper.
  17. Wen-tau Yih, "Template-based Information Extraction from Tree-structured HTML documents", Citeseerx, 1997.
  18. Evren Sirin, Bijan Parsia, Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Aditya Kalyanpur , Yarden Katz, "Pellet: A Practical OWL-DL Reasoner", publiced by Elsevier B. V, 2007.
  19. Natalya F. Noy and Deborah L. McGuinness, Stanford University, Stanford, "Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology".
  20. Michael Grobe , "RDF, Jena, SparQL and the Semantic Web", SIGUCCS'09, October 11– 14, 2009, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  21. Raman Kumar Goyal, Vikas Gupta, Vipul Sharma, Pardeep Mittal, "Ontology based web retrieval", 2008.
  22. Abad Shah, Amjad Farooq, Syed Ahsan and Mohammad Imran, "An Indexing Technique for web ontologies", Journal of computing, volume 2, issue 7, july 2010, issn 2151-9617.
  23. Protégé, http://www. protege. stanford. edu/.
  24. Apache Lucene, http://lucene. apache. org/core/.
  25. RDF, http://www. w3. org/TR/rdf-primer/
  26. OWL, http://www. w3. org/TR/owl-features/
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Ontology Rdf Owl Sparql Rdbms Inference Semantic Search Semantic Indexing Semantic Web