CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Computational Analysis of Proteases Domains using Hidden Markov Model

by Meenakshi Bhat, S. A. M. Rizvi
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 43 - Number 7
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Meenakshi Bhat, S. A. M. Rizvi
10.5120/6117-8317

Meenakshi Bhat, S. A. M. Rizvi . Computational Analysis of Proteases Domains using Hidden Markov Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 43, 7 ( April 2012), 32-35. DOI=10.5120/6117-8317

@article{ 10.5120/6117-8317,
author = { Meenakshi Bhat, S. A. M. Rizvi },
title = { Computational Analysis of Proteases Domains using Hidden Markov Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { April 2012 },
volume = { 43 },
number = { 7 },
month = { April },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 32-35 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume43/number7/6117-8317/ },
doi = { 10.5120/6117-8317 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:32:49.574575+05:30
%A Meenakshi Bhat
%A S. A. M. Rizvi
%T Computational Analysis of Proteases Domains using Hidden Markov Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 43
%N 7
%P 32-35
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this paper, we present a three-layered predictor, Profinder, for identification and analysis of protein enzyme 'Protease'. This predictor is shaped by collecting the protease family domains represented by multiple sequence alignments and hidden morkov modeling techniques. Present study here is an attempt to develop a specific algorithm for searching particular domains in the genome sequences of these protein enzymes. Therefore, it is important for both basic research and drug discovery to consider the following two problems. Given the sequence of a protein, determine whether the protein is a protease or not? And if so, then which class of proteases? It is only on the basis of their sequence analysis, one can identify their types and also can predict their secondary or tertiary structures. User can test their sequences in fasta format for identification of proteases domain and therefore can get some insights on their fuctions and secondary structures. Besides, analysis based on phylogenetic relation of these proteases by constructing their phylogenetic trees in the light of evolution can be done. Storing all the information extracted from these sequences in a new database is another perspective of this present in-silico study.

References
  1. A. J. Barrett, J. K. McDonald, Nomenclature: protease, proteinase and peptidase, Biochem. J. 237 (1986) 935.
  2. C. Seife, Blunting nature's Swiss army knife, Science 277 (1997) 1602–1603.
  3. Identification of proteases and their types by Hong-Bin Shen , Kuo-Chen Chou Published by Elsevier, Analytical Biochemistry 385 (2009) 153–160.
  4. ProtIdent: A web server for identifying proteases and their types by fusing functional domain and sequential evolution information by Kuo-Chen Chou, Hong-Bin Shen, Published by Elsevier, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 376 (2008) 321–325.
  5. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990, 215:403-410.
  6. Pearson WR, Lipman DJ: Improved Tools for Biological Sequence Comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988, 85:2444-2448.
  7. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, DJ Lipman: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25(17):3389-402.
  8. N. D. Rawlings, D. P. Tolle, A. J. Barrett, MEROPS: the peptidase database, Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) D160–D164.
  9. Eddy, S. R. (1998) Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics, 14, 755–763. Thompson, J. D. , Higgins, D. G. and Gibson, T. J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22(22), 4673-4680.
  10. Letunic,I. , Doerks,T. and Bork,P. (2009) SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. , 37, D229–D232.
  11. Finn,R. D. , Tate,J. , Mistry,J. , Coggill,P. C. , Sammut,S. J. , Hotz,H. R. , Ceric,G. , Forslund,K. , Eddy, S. R. , Sonnhammer, E. L. et al. (2008) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. , 36, D281–D288.
  12. Durbin R, Eddy S, Krogh A, Mitchison G: Biological Sequence Analysis: Probablistic Models of Protein and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1998.
  13. HMMER user's guide: biological sequence analysis using profile hidden Markov models [ftp://selab. janelia. org/pub/software/hmmer/CURRENT/Userguide. pdf].
  14. Eddy SR: HMMER: Profile hidden Markov models for biological sequence analysis. 1998 [http://hmmer. janelia. org/].
  15. Puente XS, Sanchez LM, Overall CM, Lopez-Otin C: Human and mouse proteases: a comparative genomic approach. Nat Rev Genet 2003, 4:544-558.
  16. Barrett A. J. , Rawlings ND, Woessner JF. The Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes, 2nd ed. Academic Press, 2003. ISBN 0-12-079610-4.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Proteases Motifs Sequence Alignment Protein Domains Hidden Morkov Model