We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Analysis of Semi Supervised Learning Methods towards Multi Label Text Classification

by S. C. Dharmadhikari, Maya Ingle, Parag Kulkarni
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 42 - Number 16
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: S. C. Dharmadhikari, Maya Ingle, Parag Kulkarni
10.5120/5776-8026

S. C. Dharmadhikari, Maya Ingle, Parag Kulkarni . Analysis of Semi Supervised Learning Methods towards Multi Label Text Classification. International Journal of Computer Applications. 42, 16 ( March 2012), 15-20. DOI=10.5120/5776-8026

@article{ 10.5120/5776-8026,
author = { S. C. Dharmadhikari, Maya Ingle, Parag Kulkarni },
title = { Analysis of Semi Supervised Learning Methods towards Multi Label Text Classification },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2012 },
volume = { 42 },
number = { 16 },
month = { March },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 15-20 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume42/number16/5776-8026/ },
doi = { 10.5120/5776-8026 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:32:11.943802+05:30
%A S. C. Dharmadhikari
%A Maya Ingle
%A Parag Kulkarni
%T Analysis of Semi Supervised Learning Methods towards Multi Label Text Classification
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 42
%N 16
%P 15-20
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The area of multi label text classification is getting more attention of researchers because of its role in the field of information retrieval , text mining , web mining etc. Supervised methods from machine learning are mainly used for its realization. But as it needs labeled data for classification all the time , semi supervised methods are now a day getting popular in the MLTC domain. The goal of Semi supervised learning is to reduce the classification errors using readily available unlabeled data in conjunction with available labeled data. This paper mainly provides survey and analysis of various semi supervised methods used in multi label text classification task ; This overview concludes that consideration of semantic aspects of input document datasets , their representation in conjunction with smoothness and manifold assumptions in semi supervised learning may give more relevant classification results.

References
  1. J. Zhu. Semi-supervised learning Literature Survey. Computer Science Technical Report TR 1530 , University of Wisconsin – Madison , 2005.
  2. Olivier Chapelle , Bernhard Schfolkopf , Alexander Zien. Semi-Supervised Learning2006 , 03-08 , MIT Press.
  3. G. Tsoumakas, I. Katakis. Multi-label classification: An overview. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining, 3(3):1-13, 2007.
  4. A. Santos , A. Canuto, and A. Neto, "A comparative analysis of classification methods to multi-label tasks in different application domains", International journal of computer Information systems and Industrial Management Applications". ISSN: 2150-7988 volume 3(2011), pp. 218-227.
  5. R. Cerri, R. R. Silva , and A. C. Carvalho , "Comparing Methods for multilabel classification of proteins using machine learning techniques",BSB 2009, LNCS 5676,109-120,2009.
  6. G. Tsoumakas , G. Kalliris , and I. Vlahavas, "Multi-label text classification for automated tag suggestion", Proc. Of the ECML/PKDD 2008 Discovery Challenge, Antwerp , Belgium(2008)
  7. G. Tsoumakas , G. Kalliris , and I. Vlahavas, " Effective and efficient multilabel classification in domains with large number of labels", Proc. Of the ECML/PKDD 2008 workshop on Mining Multidimensional Data (MMD' 08)(2008) 30-44.
  8. S. C. Dharmadhikari , Maya Ingle , parag Kulkarni . A comparative analysis of supervised multi-label text classification methods. IJERA , Vol. 1, Issue 4 , pp. 1952-1961 ISSN : 2248-9622.
  9. Nigam, K. , McCallum, A. K. , Thrun, S. , & Mitchell, T. M. (2000). Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Machine Learning,39, 103–134.
  10. Y. Liu, R. Jin, L. Yang. Semi-supervised Multi-label Learning by Constrained Non-Negative Matrix Factorization . In: AAAI, 2006.
  11. Z. Zha, T. Mie, Z. Wang, X. Hua. Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning with Multi-label. In ICME. page 1321- 1324, 2008.
  12. G. Chen, Y. Song, C. Zhang. Semi-supervised Multi-label Learning by Solving a Sylvester Equation. In SDM, 2008.
  13. Semi-supervised Nonnegative Matrix factorization. IEEE. January 2011.
  14. Qu Wei , Yang, Junping, Wang. Semi-supervised Multi- label Learning Algorithm using dependency among labels. In IPCSIT vol. 3 2011.
  15. S. Godbole and S. Sarawagi , "Discriminative methods for multi-labeled classification", 8th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2004.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Semi Supervised Learning Multi Label Text Classification Smoothness And Manifold Assumptions