The week's pick
Reseach Article
A Hybrid Method to Deal with Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty in Risk Assessment
by
Palash Dutta,
Tazid Ali
| International Journal of Computer Applications |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 42 - Number 11 |
| Year of Publication: 2012 |
| Authors: Palash Dutta, Tazid Ali |
10.5120/5740-7930
|
Palash Dutta, Tazid Ali . A Hybrid Method to Deal with Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty in Risk Assessment. International Journal of Computer Applications. 42, 11 ( March 2012), 37-43. DOI=10.5120/5740-7930
@article{
10.5120/5740-7930,
author = {
Palash Dutta,
Tazid Ali
},
title = { A Hybrid Method to Deal with Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty in Risk Assessment },
journal = {
International Journal of Computer Applications
},
issue_date = { March 2012 },
volume = { 42 },
number = { 11 },
month = { March },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = {
37-43
},
numpages = {9},
url = {
https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume42/number11/5740-7930/
},
doi = { 10.5120/5740-7930 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:31:05.716540+05:30
%A Palash Dutta
%A Tazid Ali
%T A Hybrid Method to Deal with Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty in Risk Assessment
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 42
%N 11
%P 37-43
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract
Risk assessment is an important and significant aid in the decision making process. Risk assessment is performed using ‘model’ and a model is a function of parameters which are usually affected by uncertainty. Some model parameters are affected by aleatory uncertainty and some others are affected by epistemic uncertainty. In this paper we propose a hybrid method to deal with propagation of both kinds of uncertainty within the same computation of risk.
References
- A. Bardossy, A. Bronstert A, B Merz , 1-, 2- and 3-dimensional modelling of groundwater movement in the unsaturated soil matrix using a fuzzy approach, Adv. Water Resources, 18 (1995) 237–251.
- C Baudrit, D. Dubois, H. Fargier, Propagation of Uncertainty involving Imprecision and Randomness. Proc.3d European Conference on Fuzzy Logic and Technology, Zittau (Germany), (2003) 653-658.
- C. Baudrit, D. Dubois, H. Fargier, Joint treatment of imprecision and randomness in uncertainty propagation, In:Modern Information Processing: From Theory to Applications. B. Bouchon-Meunier, G. Coletti, R.R. Yager (Eds.), Elsevier, (2006) 37-47.
- C. Baudrit, D. Dubois, Comparing Methods for Joint Objective and Subjective Uncertainty Propagation with an example in a risk assessment, Fourth International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Application (ISIPTA’05), Pittsburg (USA, Pennsylvanie), (2005) 31-40.
- C. Baudrit, D. Dubois, D. Guyonnet, H. Fargier, Joint Treatment of imprecision and Randomness in Uncertainty Propagation, Proc. Conf. on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Perugia, (2004) 873-880.
- C. Baudrit, D. Dubois, D. Guyonnet, Joint Propagation and Exploitation of Probabilistic and Possibilistic Information in Risk Assessment, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, 14 (2006) 593-608.
- C. Dou, W. Woldt, I. Bogardi, M. Dahab, Steady-state groundwater flow simulation with imprecise parameters, Water Resource Res., 31 (1995) 2709–2719.
- D. Guyonnet, B. Bourgine, D. Dubois, H. Fargier, B. Côme, J. P. Chilès, Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 126 (2003) 68-78.
- D. Guyonnet, B. Côme, P. Perrochet, A. Parriaux, Comparing two methods for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 125(1999) 660-666.
- E.Kentel, M. M. Aral, Probalistic-fuzzy health risk modeling, Stoch Envir Res and Risk Ass 18(2004) 324-338.
- EPA US. 2001. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment). Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA/540/R/99/005, Interim, Review Draft. United States Environmental Protection Agency. September 2001.
- H. W. Ma, K. Y. Wu, C. D. Ton, Setting information priorities for remediation decisions at a contaminated-groundwater site, Chemosphere 46 (2002) 75–81.
- H. W. Ma, Stochastic multimedia risk assessment for a site with contaminated groundwater, Stochastic Environ Res Risk Assess 16 (2002) 464–478.
- K. Ganesan, P. Veeramani, on Arithmetic operations of interval numbers, International journal of uncertainly and knowledge based systems, 13 (2005) 619-631.
- P. Labieniec , D. Dzombak, R. Siegrist, Evaluation of uncertainty in a site-specific risk assessment, J. Environ. Eng., 123(1997) 234–243.
- P. Prado D. Draper, S. Saltelli, A. Pereira, B. Mendes, S. Eguilior, R. Cheal, S. Tarantola, Gesamac: Conceptual and computational tools to tackle the long-term risk from nuclear waste disposal in the geosphere, in Eur. Commission Rep. EUR 19113 EN: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg, 1999, vol. 87.
- R. M. Maxwell, S.D. Pelmulder, A. F. B. Tompson, W. E. Kastenberg, On the development of a new methodology for groundwater-driven health risk assessment, Water Resources Res, 34(1998) 833–847.
- R. M. Maxwell, W. E. Kastenberg, Stochastic environmental risk analysis: an integrated methodology for predicting cancer risk from contaminated groundwater, Stochastic Environ Res Risk Assess 13 (1999) 27–47.
Index Terms
Computer Science
Information Sciences
Keywords