CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Simulation based analysis of RTT with PER, Buffer Size and Congestion Levels for Satellite based Networks

by Mohanchur Sarkar, K. K. Shukla, K. S. Dasgupta
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 41 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Mohanchur Sarkar, K. K. Shukla, K. S. Dasgupta
10.5120/5575-7671

Mohanchur Sarkar, K. K. Shukla, K. S. Dasgupta . Simulation based analysis of RTT with PER, Buffer Size and Congestion Levels for Satellite based Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 41, 10 ( March 2012), 9-16. DOI=10.5120/5575-7671

@article{ 10.5120/5575-7671,
author = { Mohanchur Sarkar, K. K. Shukla, K. S. Dasgupta },
title = { Simulation based analysis of RTT with PER, Buffer Size and Congestion Levels for Satellite based Networks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2012 },
volume = { 41 },
number = { 10 },
month = { March },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 9-16 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume41/number10/5575-7671/ },
doi = { 10.5120/5575-7671 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:29:13.949805+05:30
%A Mohanchur Sarkar
%A K. K. Shukla
%A K. S. Dasgupta
%T Simulation based analysis of RTT with PER, Buffer Size and Congestion Levels for Satellite based Networks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 41
%N 10
%P 9-16
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Round Trip Time values constitute one of the significant parameter available to a TCP sender for estimating the network conditions. The RTT has a significant effect on the throughput of a connection and creates the performance bottleneck for traditional AIMD TCP Protocol variants mainly when used for GEO satellite networks and other long fat networks. Many Transport Protocols like Vegas, Proactive TCP, and Westwood uses the RTT measurement for adjusting the congestion window and refining the Loss Detection Algorithms, which eventually determines the performance of the Protocol. RTT also appears in the empirical formulation of TCP throughput and protocols based on these empirical estimates. RTT is generally considered an independent parameter mainly dependent on the access delay, queuing delay, and the propagation delay of the concerned channel. In this paper, we have analyzed the dynamics of RTT behavior and shown how the congestion levels in the network, packet error rates and available buffer capacity affects the RTT measurements. The Mean RTT and the rate of change of RTT Mean values have been analyzed in different network conditions. These analysis have been carried out by simulation using ns2 considering a GEO Satellite network.

References
  1. Mohanchur Sarkar, K. K. Shukla and K. S. Dasgupta, Delay Resistant Transport Protocol for Deep Space Communication, International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences (IJCNS), Vol. 4, No. 2, February 2011, pp. 122-132.
  2. Mohanchur Sarkar, K. K. Shukla and K. S. Dasgupta, Network State Classification based on the Statistical Properties of RTT for an Adaptive Multi State Proactive Transport Protocol for Satellite based Networks, International Journal of Computer Networks and Communication (IJCNC), Vol. 2, No. 6, November 2010, pp. 155-174.
  3. Mohanchur Sarkar, K. K. Shukla, and K. S. Dasgupta, Performance Analysis of Proactive and Reactive Transport Protocols using a Proactive Congestion Avoidance Model, International Journal of Computer Applications (IJCA), Vol. 6, No. 5, September 2010, pp. 10-17.
  4. Mohanchur Sarkar, K. K. Shukla, and K. S. Dasgupta, A Proactive Transport Protocol for Performance Enhancement of Satellite based Network, International Journal of Computer Applications (IJCA), Vol. 1, No. 16, Feb 2010, pp. 114-121.
  5. L. Xu and I. Rhee, CUBIC: a new TCP-friendly high-speed TCP variant, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, Vol. 42 Issue 5, July 2008.
  6. R. H. Wang, W. T. Hsu, X. Wu, T. T. Wang and X. B. Wang, Experimental and Comparative Analysis of Channel Delay Impact on Rate-Based and Window-Based Transmission Mechanisms over Space-Internet Links, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Beijing, May 2008, pp. 2990-2994.
  7. S. C. Tsao, Y. C. Lai, and Y. D. Lin, Taxonomy and Evaluation of TCP Friendly Congestion Control Schemes on Fairness, Aggressiveness, and Responsiveness, IEEE Network, Vol. 21, Issue 6, November 2007, pp. 6-15.
  8. Space Communications Protocol Specification (SCPS) - Transport Protocol (SCPS-TP), Recommended Standard CCSDS 714. 0-B-2 Blue Book, October 2006.
  9. SatLabs Groups, Interoperable PEP (I-PEP) transport extensions and session framework for satellite communications: air interface specifications, Techinicala Report, Issue 1a-27, October 2005.
  10. I. F. Akyildiz, O. B. Akan, and G. Morabito, A Rate Control Scheme for Adaptive Real-Time Applications in IP Networks with lossy links and long round trip times, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 13, Issue 3, June 2005, pp. 554-567.
  11. T. Taleb, N. Kato, and Y. Nemoto, REFWA Plus: Enhancement of REFWA to Combat Link Errors in LEO Satellite Networks, in Proc. 2005 IEEE Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing, Hong Kong, P. R. China, May 2005, pp. 172-176.
  12. C. Liu and E. Modiano, On the performance of additive increase multiplicative decrease (AIMD) protocols in hybrid space terrestrial networks, Elsevier Computer Networks, Vol. 47, Issue 5, April 2005, pp. 661–678.
  13. Kai Xu, Ye Tian and Nirwan Ansari, TCP performance in integrated wireless communications networks, The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, Vol. 47, Issue 2, February 2005.
  14. K. Zhou, K. Yeung and V. O. K. Li, P-XCP: A-transport layer protocol for satellite IP network, In Proc. IEEE Globecom, November 2004, pp. 2707-2711.
  15. C. Caini and R. Firrincieli, TCP Hybla: a TCP enhancement for heterogeneous networks, International Journal of Satellite Communication and Networking, Vol. 22, No. 5, September 2004, pp. 547–566.
  16. Jian Fang and Ozgur B. Akan, Performance of Multimedia Rate Control Protocols in InterPlaNetary Internet, IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 8, No. 8, August 2004, pp. 488-490.
  17. L. Xu, K. Harfoush and I. Rhee, Binary increase congestion control for fast, long distance networks, In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, Vol. 4, March 2004, pp. 2514-2524.
  18. M. Luglio, M. Sanadidi, M. Gerla, and J. Stepanek, On-board satellite split TCP proxy, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication (JSAC), Vol. 22, No. 2, February 2004, pp. 362-370.
  19. M. Marchese, M. Rosei and G. Morabito, PETRA: Performance enhancing transport architecture for satellite communications, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, Vol. 22, No. 2, February 2004, pp. 320-332.
  20. O. B. Akan, J. Fang and I. F. Akyildiz, TP-Planet: A Reliable Transport Protocol for InterPlaNetary Internet, IEEE/SAC, Vol. 22, No. 2, February 2004, pp 348-61.
  21. K. Fall, W. Hong, and S. Madden, Custody Transfer for Reliable Delivery in Delay Tolerant Networks, Technical Report IRB-TR-03-030, Intel Research, Berkeley, July 2003.
  22. C. P Fu and S. C. Liew, TCP Veno: TCP enhancement for transmission over wireless access networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 21, Issue 2, Feb 2003, pp. 216-228.
  23. C. Casetti, M. Gerla, S. Mascolo, M. Sanadidi, and R. Wang, TCP Westwood: End-to-end congestion control for wired/wireless networks, ACM/Kluwer Wireless Networks (WINET) Journal, Vol. 8, Issue 5, September 2002, pp. 467-479.
  24. D. Katabi, M. Handley, and C. Rohrs, Congestion control for high bandwidth-delay product networks, In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM02, Pittsburg, August 2002, pp. 89-102.
  25. Ian F. Akyildiz, Xin Zhang and Jian Fang, TCP-Peach+: Enhancement of TCP-Peach for Satellite IP Networks, IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, Vol. 6, No. 7, July 2002.
  26. Ian F. Akyildiz, Giacomo Morabito and Sergio Palazzo, TCP-Peach: A New Congestion Control Scheme for Satellite IP Networks, IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, Vol. 9, No. 3, June 2001, pp. 307-321.
  27. J. Border, M. Kojo, J. Griner, G. Montenegro, and Z. Shelby, Performance enhancing proxies intended to mitigate link-related degradation, RFC 3135, June 2001.
  28. R. Steward et al. , Stream Control Transmission Protocol, Internet Society, Reston, VA, RFC 2960, October 2000.
  29. S. Floyd, M. Handley, J. Padhye, and J. Widmer, Equation-Based Congestion Control for Unicast Applications, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol 30, Issue 4, October 2000, pp. 45-56.
  30. M. Allman, S. Dawkinks, et al. , Ongoing TCP research related to satellites, RFC 2760, Feb 2000.
  31. C. Barakat, E. Altman, and W. Dabbous, On TCP performance in a heterogeneous network: a survey, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 38, Issue 1, Jan 2000, pp. 40-46.
  32. N. Ghani and S. Dixit, TCP/IP enhancement for satellite networks, IEEE Communication Magazine, Vol. 37, No. 7, July 1999, pp. 64-72.
  33. S. Floyd and T. Henderson, The New Reno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm, RFC 2585, April 1999.
  34. T. Henderson and R. Katz, Transport protocols for Internet-compatible satellite networks, IEEE Journal Selected Areas in Communication, Vol. 17, No. 2, February 1999, pp. 326-344.
  35. C. Metz, TCP over satellite the final frontier, IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. 3, Issue 1, January 1999, pp. 76–80.
  36. C. Partridge and T. J. Shepard, TCP/IP performance over satellite links, IEEE Network Magazine, Vol 11, Issue 5, October 1997, pp. 44–49.
  37. T. V. Lakshman and U. Madhow, The performance of TCP/IP for networks with high bandwidth-delay products and random loss, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, Vol. 5, Issue 3, June 1997, pp. 336-350.
  38. Mathis, M. , J. Mahdavi, S. Floyd, and A. Romanow, TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options, RFC 2018, April 1996.
  39. H. Balakrishnan, S. Seshan, E. Amir and R. H. Katz, Improving TCP/IP Performance over Wireless Networks, Proc. ACM MOBICOM, November 1995, pp. 2-11.
  40. L. S. Brakmo, S. O'Malley and L. L. Peterson, TCP Vegas: New Techniques for Congestion Detection and Avoidance, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 24, Issue 4, October 1994, pp. 24-35.
  41. V. Jacobson, Berkeley TCP Evolution from 4. 3-Tahoe to 4. 3-Reno, Proc. British Columbia Internet Engineering Task Force, July 1990.
  42. V. Jacobson, Congestion avoidance and control , ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 18, Issue 4, August 1988, pp. 314-329.
  43. UCB/LBNL/VINT Network Simulator. http://www. isi. edu/nsnam/ns/
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Rtt Analysis Correlation Congestion Epoch Loss Detection Algorithm

Powered by PhDFocusTM