We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Call for Paper
December Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming December edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 November 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Augmenting the Performance of Existing OODBMS Benchmarks

by V. Geetha, N. Sreenath
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 40 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: V. Geetha, N. Sreenath
10.5120/4956-7208

V. Geetha, N. Sreenath . Augmenting the Performance of Existing OODBMS Benchmarks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 40, 5 ( February 2012), 41-46. DOI=10.5120/4956-7208

@article{ 10.5120/4956-7208,
author = { V. Geetha, N. Sreenath },
title = { Augmenting the Performance of Existing OODBMS Benchmarks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2012 },
volume = { 40 },
number = { 5 },
month = { February },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 41-46 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume40/number5/4956-7208/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4956-7208 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:27:20.046708+05:30
%A V. Geetha
%A N. Sreenath
%T Augmenting the Performance of Existing OODBMS Benchmarks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 40
%N 5
%P 41-46
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Object oriented databases are widely popular for their complex data support and data relationships. Several object oriented database products are now coming to the market. Existing benchmarks are inadequate in testing the complex data support, concurrency control and performance of the database. They do not exploit the object oriented features native to the databases. This paper aims in highlighting the points where the benchmarks should focus, how they should be structured to test the performance of the databases satisfactorily.

References
  1. Anon et al. 1985. A measure of Transaction Processing Power, Datamation, 31(7):112-118.
  2. Anderson et al. 1990. The HyperModel Benchmark, Proc. of the Int. Conference on Extending Database Technology.
  3. Ashutosh Tiwary, Vivek R. Narasayya, Henry M. Levy: 1995. Evaluation of OO7 as a system and an application benchmark, In OOPSLA Workshop on Object Database Behavior, Benchmarks and Performance, Austin, Texas.
  4. Banerjee et al. 1987. Semantics and Implementation of Schema evolution in Object–Oriented Databases, In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD conference.
  5. Carey et al. 1993. The OO7 Benchmark, In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference.
  6. Carey et al. 1994. A Status Report on the OO7 OODBMS Benchmarking Effort, In proceedings of the ACM OOPSLA Conference.
  7. Cattell R. G.G and Skeen. J. 1992. Object Operations Benchmark, ACM Transactions on Database Systems. 17 (1):1-31.
  8. Cattell R.G.G. 1993. An Engineering Database Benchmark, In: The Benchmark Handbook for Database and Transaction Processing Systems 2nd ed., J. Gray ed., Morgan Kaufmann.
  9. Darmont. J, Petit.B and Schneider. M. 1998. OCB: A generic benchmark to evaluate the performances of object-oriented database systems, Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Extending Database Technology Valencia, Spain, LNCS.
  10. Darmont Jerome, and Michel Schneider. 2002. Object-Oriented Database Benchmarks, Advanced Topics in Database Research, Volume 1. IGI Global, 34-57.
  11. DeWitt et al. 1990. A study of three alternative workstation-server architectures for object oriented database systems. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Very Large Data Bases Conference, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 107-121.
  12. Gray.J. 1993. The Benchmark Handbook for Database and Transaction Systems (2nd Edition), Morgan Kaufmann.
  13. Geetha. V and Sreenath. N. 2011. A Multi-Granularity Lock Model for Object Oriented Databases using Semantics, International Conference on Distributed Computing and Internet Technologies, Bhubaneshwar, India, Proceedings in LNCS.
  14. Geetha. V and Sreenath. N. 2011. Semantic Based Concurrency Control in OODBMS, International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology, Chennai, India, in Proceedings in IEEE Computer Society.
  15. Jun, W. And Gruenwald. L 1997. Experiences with the 007 Benchmark for Concurrency Control Technique Performance Evaluations, ACM Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA '97) Workshop on Experiences Using Object Data Management, pp. 1-5.
  16. Karey M.J. et al. 1997. The BUCKY Object-Relational Benchmark, In proceedings of the 1997 ACM – SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Tuscon, Arizona.
  17. Kim.W, Bertino,E and Garza.J.F.1990. Composite Objects revisited, Object oriented Programming, systems, Languages and Applications, pp 327-340.
  18. Lakey. B. 1989. Developing benchmarks for comparing relational and object-oriented database systems. Master’s Thesis, Oregon Graduate Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
  19. Lee. S.H et al. 2000. The BORD Benchmark for Object-Relational Databases, Springer-Verilag Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
  20. Riehle.D, Stephen P. Berczuk. 2000. Properties of Member Functions in C++, Report.
  21. H.Schreiber, Justitia:. A Generic Benchmark for the OODBMS Selection, Proc. of the Fourth International Conference of Data and Knowledge Systems for Manufacturing and Engineering, (1994)
  22. Schreiber and Justitia. 1994. A Generic Benchmark for the OODBMS Selection, Proc. of the Fourth International Conference of Data and Knowledge Systems for Manufacturing and Engineering.
  23. Shanely.K 1998. History and overview of the TPC, Transaction Processing Performance Council, http:// tpc.org.
  24. Stonebraker. M. 1996. Object – Relational Database Systems: the next wave, Morgan Kaufmann.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Object oriented databases Benchmark Concurrency control Performance Object oriented features

Powered by PhDFocusTM