We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Empirical and Automated Analysis of Web Applications

by R. B. Kulkarni, Dr. S. K. Dixit
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 38 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: R. B. Kulkarni, Dr. S. K. Dixit
10.5120/4713-6865

R. B. Kulkarni, Dr. S. K. Dixit . Empirical and Automated Analysis of Web Applications. International Journal of Computer Applications. 38, 9 ( January 2012), 1-8. DOI=10.5120/4713-6865

@article{ 10.5120/4713-6865,
author = { R. B. Kulkarni, Dr. S. K. Dixit },
title = { Empirical and Automated Analysis of Web Applications },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2012 },
volume = { 38 },
number = { 9 },
month = { January },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-8 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume38/number9/4713-6865/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4713-6865 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:24:56.044772+05:30
%A R. B. Kulkarni
%A Dr. S. K. Dixit
%T Empirical and Automated Analysis of Web Applications
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 38
%N 9
%P 1-8
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The Quality of web applications are now prima focus. As most of the transactions like e-commerce, banking and e-governance are done on the internet, having a web application to be with quality factors and secure is now the need. It has been found that aesthetic factors are decisive in deciding the quality of web application. In this paper we have surveyed various quality factors of web applications and have empirically analyzed web applications. The paper also proposes an automatic tool to calculate the quality and aesthetic factors of web application.

References
  1. – Iwaarden J.V., Wiele T.V.D., Ball, L., and Millen, R. (2003), Applying SERVQUAL to Web sites : an exploratory study, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 20 (8), pp. 919-935.
  2. J. Hartmann, A. D. Angeli and A. Sutcliffe, “Framing the User Experience: Information Biases on Website Quality Judgement”, Proceeding of the Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy, April 2008, pp 855-864.
  3. G. Gledec, "Quality Model for the World Wide Web", in 8th International Conference on Telecommunications - ConTEL2005 Zagreb, Croatia, June 2005, pp 281-287.
  4. Z. Zhou, H. Zhou, and H. Yang, "Evaluating Websites using A Practical Quality Model", in 14th International Conference on Automation &Computing Society West London, England, September 2008.
  5. – Dhyani J., Keong W. and Bhowmick S, A Survey of Web Metrics, ACM Computing Surveys, 2002
  6. - M. Y. Ivory and M. Hearst, "The State-of-The-Art in Automating Usability Evaluation of User Interfaces", in ACM Computing Surveys, July 2001.
  7. - Kukich, K. (2000). The debate on automated essay grading. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15(5), 22-27.
  8. - Ivory, M. Y., Sinha, R. R., and Hearst, M. A. (2000a). Preliminary findings on quantitative measures for distinguishing highly rated information-centric web pages. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Human Factors and the Web, pages 214{228. Available from http://www.tri.sbc.com/hfweb/.
  9. - C. Calero, J. Ruiz and M. Piattini, "Classifying Web Metrics Using the Web Quality Model", in Online Information Review, April 2005, pp 227-248.
  10. - Luis Olsina1, Gustavo Rossi, (2003), A Quantitative Method for Quality Evaluation of Web Sites and Applications
  11. - Cockburn, A. and McKenzie, B. (2000). What do web users do? an empirical analysis of web use. Technical report, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
  12. - Miller, C. S. and Remington, R. W. (2000). A computational model of web navigation: Exploring interactions between hierarchical depth and link ambiguity. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Human Factors and the Web. Available from http://www.tri.sbc.com/hfweb/.
  13. - Chi, E.H., Pirolli, P. and Pitkow J. (2000), The scene of a site : A system for analyzing and predicting information scrent, usage and usability of a web site. In Proceedings of ACM CHI ’00 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Available from http://citseer.nj.nec.com/chi00scent.html.
  14. - WebCriteria (1999). Max, and the objective measurement of web sites. Technical report, WebCriteria Inc.
  15. - Chi, E. H., Pirolli, P., and Pitkow, J. (2000). The scent of a site: A system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage and usability of a web site. In Proceedings of ACM CHI '00 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Available from http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/chi00scent.html.
  16. - Center for Applied Special Technology (2001). Welcome to Bobby 3.2. Online. URL http://www.cast.org/bobby/
  17. - National Institute of Standards and Technology (2001). Web metrics testbed. Online. URL http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/WebTools/.
  18. - UsableNet (2001). LIFT online. Online. URL http://www.usablenet.com/lift online/index.htm.
  19. - B. Liburne, P. Devkota and K. M. Khan, "Measuring Quality Metrics for Web Applications", in 2004 IRMA International Conference, New Orleans, USA, August 2004.
  20. - N. Bevan, "Quality in Use: Meeting User Needs for Quality", Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 49, December 1999, pp 89-96.
  21. - G. Brajnik, "Towards Valid Quality Models for Websites", in 7th Conference onHuman Factors and the Web, Madison, Wisconsin, June 2001.
  22. - B. Yen, P. Jen-Hwa Hu and M. Wang, “An analytical Approach for Effective Website Design: A Framework for Modelling, Evaluation and Enhancement”, Publisher Elsevier Science Publishers B.
  23. Z. Li, J. Li and X. Li, “A Study on Website Operation Efficiency Evaluation: Based on DEA Model”, in Management and Service Science (MASS '09), also in International Conference on, Sept 2009, pp 1 – 6.
  24. L. Mich, M. Franch and L. Gaio, "Evaluating and Designing Website Quality", vol. 10: The IEEE Computer Society, March 2003, pp 34-43.
  25. - W3C, "W3C Quality Assurance", July 2006.
  26. - J. Nantel and E. Glaser, “The Impact of Language and Culture on Perceived Website Usability”, Publisher Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March 2008, pp 112-122.
  27. - Fogg, B.J. 2003. Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online. In Proceedings of CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florida, USA, April 05 -10, 2003). ACM Press, New York, NY, 722-723.
  28. - J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering Morgan Kaufmann, September 1993.
  29. - H. Jati and D. Durai Dominic, “Quality Evaluation of E-government Website Using Web Diagnostic Tools: Asian Case”, in Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, Publisher IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA, Sept 2009, pp 85-89.
  30. - C. Calero, J. Ruiz and M. Piattini, "Classifying Web Metrics Using the Web Quality Model", in Online Information Review, April 2005, pp 227-248.
  31. - ISO (9241-151) 2008 Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 151: Guidance on World Wide Web user interface. BSI -British Standards.
  32. Arnheim, R. 1983 Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Los Angeles, University of California Press.
  33. G. M. Weinberg, Quality Software Management: Anticipating Change Dorset House Publishing Co Inc, USA, February 1997.
  34. Norman E. Fenton and S. L. Pfleeger, Software Metrics: Course Technology, June 1998.
  35. - 4A] C. Consortium, "Poor Project Management – Problem of E-Projects", Cutter Consortium: The Cutter Edge, November 2000.
  36. J. Offutt, "Quality Attributes of Web Software Applications", Software, IEEE, vol. 19, May 2002, pp 25-32.
  37. - J. Offutt, "Quality Attributes of Web Software Applications", Software, IEEE,vol. 19, May 2002, pp 25-32.
  38. - G. Brajnik, "Towards Valid Quality Models for Websites", in 7th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, Madison, Wisconsin, June 2001.
  39. – Fogg B.J., Marshall J., Laraki O., Osipovich, A. Varma, C. Fang, N. Paul, J. Rangnekar, A. Shon, J. Swani, P. and Treinen M (2001), What makes Web sites creditble? A report on a large quantative study, Proceddings of CHI’01, Human Factors in Computing Systems, 61-68.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Empirical Analysis Automated Analysis Quality Models Web Applications

Powered by PhDFocusTM