We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Call for Paper
December Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming December edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 November 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Effect of Quality Parameters in Efficient Routing Protocol - Grid FSR with Best QoS Constraints

by S.Nithya Rekha, Dr. C. Chandrasekar, R. Kaniezhil
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 37 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: S.Nithya Rekha, Dr. C. Chandrasekar, R. Kaniezhil
10.5120/4584-6507

S.Nithya Rekha, Dr. C. Chandrasekar, R. Kaniezhil . Effect of Quality Parameters in Efficient Routing Protocol - Grid FSR with Best QoS Constraints. International Journal of Computer Applications. 37, 2 ( January 2012), 51-57. DOI=10.5120/4584-6507

@article{ 10.5120/4584-6507,
author = { S.Nithya Rekha, Dr. C. Chandrasekar, R. Kaniezhil },
title = { Effect of Quality Parameters in Efficient Routing Protocol - Grid FSR with Best QoS Constraints },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2012 },
volume = { 37 },
number = { 2 },
month = { January },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 51-57 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume37/number2/4584-6507/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4584-6507 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:23:18.446936+05:30
%A S.Nithya Rekha
%A Dr. C. Chandrasekar
%A R. Kaniezhil
%T Effect of Quality Parameters in Efficient Routing Protocol - Grid FSR with Best QoS Constraints
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 37
%N 2
%P 51-57
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Rapid advanced in information technology has made it possible to transmit the data in wireless links without the aid of any fixed infrastructure or centralized administrator. Wireless mobile ad hoc networks are self-creating, self-administering and self-organizing entities. Thus a set of self-motivated mobile wireless users is able to dynamically exchange data among themselves, even in the absence of a predetermined infrastructure and controller. In our research work, we present investigations on the behavior of the Proactive Routing Protocol FSR in the GRID by analysis of various parameters. The Performance metrics that are used to evaluate performance of the routing protocols are Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Network Control Overhead, Normalized Overhead, Throughput and Average End to End Delay. Experimental results reveal that FSR is more efficient in Grid FSR in all QOS constraints.FSR can be used in all Resource critical environments. Scalability in respect to QOS is effective in FSR- large area routing protocol. Grid Fisheye state routing (GFSR) consumes less bandwidth by restricting the propagation of routing control messages in paths formed by alternating gateways and neighbor heads, and allowing the gateways to selectively include routing table entries in their control messages.PDR and Throughput are 100% efficient in Simulation Evaluation with NS2.

References
  1. J. Broch, D.A. Maltz, D.B. Johnson, Y.-C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva, “A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols,” In Proceedings of ACM/IEEE MOBICOM’98, Dallas, TX, Oct. 1998, pp. 85-97.
  2. T.-W. Chen and M. Gerla, “Global State Routing: A New Routing Scheme for Ad-hoc Wireless Networks,” In Proceedings of IEEE ICC’98, Atlanta, GA, Jun.1998, pp. 171-175.
  3. G. P. Mario, M. Gerla and T-W Chen, “Fisheye State Routing: A Routing Scheme for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks, “Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications, New Orleans, USA, June 2000,pp. 70 -74.
  4. T-H. Chu and S-I. Hwang, “Efficient Fisheye State Routing Protocol using Virtual Grid in High density Ad Hoc Networks,” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, vol. 3, February 2006, pp. 1475 – 1478.
  5. Z. J. Hass and M. R. Pearlman, “The performance of a new routing protocol for the reconfigurable wireless networks,” In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 1998, p 156-160.
  6. Gerla, M.; Xiao an Hong; Guangyu Pei, “Landmark routing for large ad hoc wireless networks,” In Proceedings of Global Telecommunications Conference, Volume 3, 27 Nov.-1 Dec. 2000, pp. 1702 - 1706.
  7. Young-Bae Ko and Nitin H. Vaidya, “Location-Aided Routing(LAR) in Mobile Ad hoc Networks,” In Proceedings of ACM/Baltzer Wireless Networks (WINET) journal, Vol.6-4, 2000 - Extended version of the Mobicom’98 paper.
  8. Wen-Hwa Liao, Jang-Ping Sheu, Yu-Chee Tseng, “GRID: A Fully Location-Aware Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad hoc Networks.” In Proceedings of Telecommunication Systems, 18(1-3): 37-60 (2001).
  9. A. Senthilkumar, Dr.C.Chandrasekar, “Multiple Data-Paths Routing of Probabilistic Approach towards Secure Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks”, European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol.47 No.4 (2010), pp.618-631. (Impact factor: 0.047, Indexed by Scopus)
  10. Laigar, P., (2002), “Analysis of Routing Algorithms for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks”, Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Computer Engineering, Gothenburg 2002.
  11. Broch, J., Maltz, D., Johnson, D., Hu, Y., and Jetcheva, J., (1998), “Multi-Hop Wireless Ad- hoc Network Routing Protocols”, In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM), pages 85–97, 1998.
  12. Tanu Preet Singh, Dr. R.K Singh, Jayant Vats.,(2011) “ Effect of Quality Parameters on Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in MANETs”, International Journal of computer Science and Technology,Vol.3,No.7,July 2011.
  13. P.Parameswari, Dr.C.Chandrasekar, “Secured Cache Consistent Scheme for Mobile Ad Hoc Network”, European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol.50 No.2 (2011), pp. 238-245. (Impact factor: 0.047, Indexed by Scopus)
  14. David Oliver Jorg, “Performance Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols In Different Network Sizes”, Computer Science Project, Institute of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Computer Networks and Distributed Systems (RVS),University of Berne, Switzerland, 2003.
  15. S.Mohanapriya, Dr. C. Chandrasekar, “Efficient Multicast Geographic Service Provisioning in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks”, European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol.50 No.2 (2011), pp. 179-186. (Impact factor: 0.047, Indexed by Scopus).
  16. Tan, D.S., Zhou, S., Ho, J., Mehta, J.S., Tanabe, H., (2002), “Design and Evaluation of an Individually Simulated Mobility Model in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks”, In Proc. Communication Networks and Distributed Systems Modeling and Simulation, San Antonio, TX, 2002.
  17. Hong, X., Gelra, M., Pei, G., and Chiang, C., (1999), “A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks”, In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM), Aug. 1999.
  18. M.Umashankar, Dr.C.Chandrasekar, “Energy Efficient Secured Data Fusion Assurance Mechanism for Wireless Sensor Networks”, European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol.49 No.3 (2011), pp. 333-339.(Impact factor: 0.047, Indexed by Scopus)
  19. Chen, T., W., and Gerla, M., (1998), “Global State Routing: A New Routing Scheme for Ad-hoc Wireless Networks”, In Proceedings of IEEE ICC’98, Atlanta, GA, pp. 171-175. Jun. 1998.
  20. S. Murthy and J.J. Garcia-Luna- Aceves , “An Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Networks,” ACM/Baltzer Mobile Networks and Applications, vol.1, no. 2, Oct. 1996, pp. 183-197.
  21. Ashish K. Maurya and Dinesh Singh, “Simulation based Performance Comparison of AODV, FSR and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET”, In International Journal of Computer Applications,(0975-8887) Vol.12-No.2,Nov.2010.
  22. L. Breslau, D. Estrin, K. Fall, S. Floyd, J. Heinemann, A. Helmy, P. Huang, S. McCanne, K. Varadhan, Y. Xu, H. Yu, Advances in Network Simulation (ns)", IEEE Computer, vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 59-67, May 2000
  23. S. Murthy and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “An Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Networks,” ACM Mobile Networks and Applications Journal, Special Issue on Routing in Mobile Communication Networks, Vol. 1, no. 2, October 1996, pp. 183-197.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET Network Protocols Link State Routing (LSR) Fish-eye State Routing Protocol (FSR) GRID Fisheye Routing Protocol (GFSR) QoS NS2 Packet Delivery Ratio Throughput Control Overhead Normalized Overhead End to End Delay

Powered by PhDFocusTM