We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

Comparing the Performance of AODV, DSR in Randomwaypoint and Randomwalk Mobility Models

by M. D. Vimalapriya, Dr. S. Santhosh Baboo
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 37 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: M. D. Vimalapriya, Dr. S. Santhosh Baboo
10.5120/4739-6957

M. D. Vimalapriya, Dr. S. Santhosh Baboo . Comparing the Performance of AODV, DSR in Randomwaypoint and Randomwalk Mobility Models. International Journal of Computer Applications. 37, 12 ( January 2012), 25-29. DOI=10.5120/4739-6957

@article{ 10.5120/4739-6957,
author = { M. D. Vimalapriya, Dr. S. Santhosh Baboo },
title = { Comparing the Performance of AODV, DSR in Randomwaypoint and Randomwalk Mobility Models },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2012 },
volume = { 37 },
number = { 12 },
month = { January },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 25-29 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume37/number12/4739-6957/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4739-6957 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:24:10.377846+05:30
%A M. D. Vimalapriya
%A Dr. S. Santhosh Baboo
%T Comparing the Performance of AODV, DSR in Randomwaypoint and Randomwalk Mobility Models
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 37
%N 12
%P 25-29
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Wireless networking is a technology that permit users to move from one location to another and access information regardless of their geographical position. Mobile Ad-Hoc networks comprise of wireless mobile nodes highly dynamic in nature, with rapidly changing topologies in the absence of fixed infrastructure. Nodes of these networks function as a routers which discover and maintain the routes to other nodes in the network. In such networks, nodes are able to move and synchronize with their neighbors. The network connections can change dynamically due to mobility and nodes can be added and removed at any time. In this paper, we are going to compare mobile adhoc network routing protocols AODV and DSR using network simulator NS2 in Randomway point and Random Walk mobility models. The performance of two protocols have been compared together and individually with varying number of nodes . The performance metrics includes PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio), End to End Delay, Routing Load.

References
  1. C.E. Perkins, E.M. Royer & S. Das, Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing,IETFInternet draft, draft-ietf-manet-aodv-08.txt, March 2001
  2. S. R. Das, R. Castaneda, J. Yan, R. Sengupta, “Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad hoc Networks”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, pp.153-161, 1998.
  3. David B. Johnson, David A. Maltz, Yih-Chun Hu, and Jorjeta G. Jetcheva., “The dynamic source routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks,” Internet Draft, MANET Working Group, draft-ietf-manet-dsr- 07.txt, February 2002.
  4. Valentina Timcenko,Mirjana Stojanovic and Slavica BostJancic Rakas,“ Manet Routing Protocols vs.Mobility Models: Performance Analysis and Comparison”,Proceedings of the 9th WEAS International Conference on applied informatics and communications(aic’09)2009
  5. T Clausen, P Jacket, L Viennot, “Comparative study of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” The First Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop. September 2002
  6. Ian D. Chakeres and Elizabeth M. Belding-Royer. AODV Routing Protocol Implementation Design
  7. Mohd Izuan Mohd Saad, Zuriati Ahmad Zukarnain, “Performance Analysis of Random-Based Mobility Models in MANET Routing Protocol” European Journal of Scientific Research
  8. Jochen Schiller, “Mobile Communications”,. Addison- Wesley, 2000
  9. Azzedine Boukerche “Algorithms and Protocols for Wireless, Mobile AdHoc Networks”, 2008.
  10. Mohammad llyas,Richard C. Dorf “The handbook of ad hoc wireless networks”, 2003.
  11. The NS-2 Network Simulator, http:/ /www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
  12. Tracy Camp, Jeff Boleng, Vanessa Davies “A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research”, Wireless Communication & Mobile Computing (WCMC): Special issue on Mobile Ad Hoc networking: Research, Trends and Applications, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 483-502, 2002.
  13. Harminder S, Bindra1, Sunil K. Maakar and A. L. Sangal “Performance Evaluation of Two Reactive Routing Protocols of MANET using Group Mobility Model” , Group Mobility Model”, IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 7, Issue 3, No 10, May 2010
  14. Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Working Group – AODV, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt
  15. Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Working Group – DSR, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4728.txt.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Manet AODV DSR Randomwaypoint Random Walk PDR End to End Delay Routing load