CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Architecture of a Conference Management System Providing Advanced Paper Assignment Features

by Yordan Kalmukov
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 34 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Yordan Kalmukov
10.5120/4083-5888

Yordan Kalmukov . Architecture of a Conference Management System Providing Advanced Paper Assignment Features. International Journal of Computer Applications. 34, 3 ( November 2011), 51-59. DOI=10.5120/4083-5888

@article{ 10.5120/4083-5888,
author = { Yordan Kalmukov },
title = { Architecture of a Conference Management System Providing Advanced Paper Assignment Features },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2011 },
volume = { 34 },
number = { 3 },
month = { November },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 51-59 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume34/number3/4083-5888/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4083-5888 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:20:11.599162+05:30
%A Yordan Kalmukov
%T Architecture of a Conference Management System Providing Advanced Paper Assignment Features
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 34
%N 3
%P 51-59
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper proposes an architecture and assignment management model of a conference management system that performs a precise and accurate automatic assignment of reviewers to papers. The system relies on taxonomy of keywords to describe papers and reviewers’ competences. The implied hierarchical structure of the taxonomy provides important additional information – the semantic relationships between the separate keywords. It allows similarity measures to take into account not only the number of exactly matching keywords between a paper and a reviewer, but in case of non-matching ones to calculate how semantically close they are. Reviewers are allowed to bid on the papers they would like to (or not like to) review and to explicitly state conflicts of interest (CoI) with papers. An automatic CoI detection is checking for additional conflicts based on institutional affiliation, co-authorship (within the local database) and previous co-authorship in the past (within the major bibliographic indexes and digital libraries). The algorithm for automatic assignment takes into account all – selected keywords, reviewers’ bids and conflicts of interest and tries to find the most accurate assignment while maintaining load balancing among reviewers.

References
  1. Aleman-Meza, B. et al. Scalable Semantic Analytics on Social Networks for Addressing the Problem of Conflict of Interest Detection. ACM Transactions on the Web, Vol. 2 (1), 2008
  2. Aleman-Meza, B. et al. Semantic Analytics on Social Networks: Experiences in Addressing the Problem of Conflict of Interest Detection. Proceedings of the World Wide Web 2006, ACM Press, 2006
  3. Ferilli S., N. Di Mauro, T.M.A. Basile, F. Esposito, M. Biba. Automatic Topics Identification for Reviewer Assignment. IEA/AIE 2006. Springer LNCS, 2006
  4. Huang, M., Y. Feng, B. C. Desai. CONFSYS: A Web-based Academic Conference Management System. Proceedings of 2008 C3S2E conference. ACM Press, 2008
  5. Huang, M., Y. Feng, B. C. Desai. CONFSYS2: An Improved Web-based Multi-Conference Management System. Proceedings of the 2009 C3S2E conference. ACM.
  6. Kalmukov, Y. An algorithm for automatic assignment of reviewers to papers. Proceedings of CompSysTech’06. Avangard Print, 2006
  7. Kalmukov, Y., B. Rachev. Comparative Analysis of Existing Methods and Algorithms for Automatic Assignment of Reviewers to Papers. Journal of Information Technologies and Control 2010:(2), ISSN 1312-2622
  8. Kuhn, Harold W. "The Hungarian Method for the assignment problem". Naval Research Logistics Quarterly. 1955:2, 1955, pp. 83–97
  9. Munkres, J. "Algorithms for the Assignment and Transportation Problems". Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. 5:1, 1957, pp. 32–38
  10. Papagelis, M., D. Plexousakis, P. Nikolaou. CONFIOUS: Managing the Electronic Submission and Reviewing Process of Scientific Conferences. Lecture Notes on Computer Science vol. 3806, 2005, pp. 711 –720
  11. Pesenhofer A., R. Mayer, A. Rauber. Improving Scientific Conferences by enhancing Conference Management System with information mining capabilities. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM 2006), ISBN: 1-4244-0682-x
  12. Rigaux Ph. An Iterative Rating Method: Application to Web-based Conference Management. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on applied computing
  13. Rodriguez M., J. Bollen. An Algorithm to Determine Peer-Reviewers. Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2008), ACM Press, pages 319-328
  14. Ryan, M. Cloud Computing Privacy Concerns on Our Doorstep. Communications of the ACM vol. 54 (1), 2011
  15. van de Stadt, R., CyberChair: A Web-Based Groupware Application to Facilitate the Paper Reviewing Process. 2001, Available at www.cyberchair.org
  16. ACM Digital Library, http://dl.acm.org/
  17. Ceur Workshop Proceedings, http://ceur-ws.org
  18. Confious CMS, http://confioussite.ics.forth.gr/
  19. ConfMaster, http://www.confmaster.net/
  20. ConfTool CMS, http://conftool.net/
  21. CrossRef:CrossCheck, a plagiarism detection service, http://www.crossref.org/crosscheck/index.html
  22. CyberChair CMS, http://www.borbala.com/cyberchair/
  23. DBLP Computer Science Bibliography, http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/
  24. Docoloc, http://www.docoloc.de/
  25. EasyChair CMS, http://www.easychair.org/
  26. Editorial Assitant (EDAS), http://edas.info/
  27. Google Scholar, http://scholar.google.com/
  28. IAPR Commence, http://iaprcommence.sourceforge.net/
  29. International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies CompSysTech, http://www.compsystech.org/
  30. iThenticate, http://www.ithenticate.com/
  31. LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/
  32. Microsoft CMT, http://cmt.research.microsoft.com/cmt/
  33. OpenConf CMS, http://www.openconf.com/
  34. PlagAware, http://www.plagaware.com/
  35. PlagScan - plagiarism checker, http://www.plagscan.com/
  36. Scientific Literature Digital Library and Search Engine CiteSeer, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
  37. The Friend of a Friend (FOAF) project, http://www.foaf-project.org/
  38. The MyReview System, http://myreview.lri.fr/
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Conference management systems Assignment of reviewers to papers Software architecture Web applications Conflicts of interest detection Bidding on papers