CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

A Computer Aided Diagnosis System for Microcalcification Cluster Detection in Digital Mammogram

by T.Balakumaran, Dr.ILA.Vennila
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 34 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: T.Balakumaran, Dr.ILA.Vennila
10.5120/4066-5851

T.Balakumaran, Dr.ILA.Vennila . A Computer Aided Diagnosis System for Microcalcification Cluster Detection in Digital Mammogram. International Journal of Computer Applications. 34, 1 ( November 2011), 39-45. DOI=10.5120/4066-5851

@article{ 10.5120/4066-5851,
author = { T.Balakumaran, Dr.ILA.Vennila },
title = { A Computer Aided Diagnosis System for Microcalcification Cluster Detection in Digital Mammogram },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2011 },
volume = { 34 },
number = { 1 },
month = { November },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 39-45 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume34/number1/4066-5851/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4066-5851 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:20:00.215540+05:30
%A T.Balakumaran
%A Dr.ILA.Vennila
%T A Computer Aided Diagnosis System for Microcalcification Cluster Detection in Digital Mammogram
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 34
%N 1
%P 39-45
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Mammography is the most efficient method for breast cancer early detection. Clusters of microcalcifications are the sign of breast cancer and their early detection is the key to improve breast cancer prognosis. Microcalcifications appear in mammogram as tiny granular points, which are difficult to observe by radiologists due to their small size. An efficient method for automatic and accurate detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms is the use of Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems. This paper presents a novel approach based on multiscale products of eigenvalues of Hessian matrix. The detection of microcalcifications is achieved by decomposing the mammograms by filter bank based on Hessian matrix into different frequency sub-bands, suppressing the low-frequency subband, and finally reconstructing the subbands containing only significant high frequencies features. The significant features are obtained by multiscale products. Preliminary results indicate that the proposed scheme is better in suppressing the background and detecting the microcalcification clusters than any other detection methods.

References
  1. Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Moore, R., Kegelmeyer, P . 2000. The digital database for screening mammography. In: The Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Medical Physics Publishing(Madison,WI), pp.662–671.
  2. C. J. Vyborny and R. A. Schmidt. 1994. Technical image quality and the visibility of mammographic detail, in Syllabus: A Categorical Course in Physics-Technical Aspects of Breast Imaging, A. G. Haus and M. J. Yaffe, Eds. Oak Book III: Radiological Society of North America, pp.103–111.
  3. G. M. te Brake and N. Karssemeijer .1999. Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms.IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 628–639.
  4. R. G. Bird, T. W. Wallace, and B. C. Yankaskas .1992. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology,vol. 184, pp. 613–617.
  5. M. L. Giger, P. Lu, Z. Huo, U. Bick, C. J. Vyborny, R. A. Schmidt, W. Zheng, C. E. Metz, D. Wolverton, R. M.Nishikawa, W. Zouras, and K. Doi .1994. CAD in digital mammography: Computerized detection and classification of masses. in Digital Mammography, A. G. Gale, Ed. et al. Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier Science, pp. 281–287.
  6. W. P. Kegelmeyer, Jr, J. Prundeda, P. Bourland, A. Hillis, M. Riggs, and M.Nipper . 1994. Computer aided mammographic screening for Speculated lesions. Radiology, vol. 191, pp. 331–337.
  7. K. Doi, H. MacMahon, S. Katsuragawa, R. M. Nishikawa, and Y. Jiang . 1999. Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: Potential and pitfall. Eur. J. Radiol., vol. 31, pp. 97–109.
  8. H. Li, K. J. Liu, and S. Lo . 1997. Fractal modeling and segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans.Med. Imag., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 785–798.
  9. S. Yu, L. Guan .1998. A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films”, IEEE Trans.Med. Imag., vol. 19, no.2, pp. 115–126,1998
  10. S.Mallat . 1987. A compact multiresolution representation: the wavelet model. Proc. IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Computer Vision, IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, D.C., p.2-7.
  11. S. Mallat .1989. Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 2091–2110.
  12. Ted C. Wang and Nicolaos B. Karayiannis .1998. Detection of Microcalcifications in Digital Mammograms Using Wavelets. IEEE Tran. on Medical Imaging, vol. 17, pp. 498-509.
  13. R. N. Strickland and H. I. Hahn . 1996. Wavelet transform for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 218–229.
  14. H. Yoshida, K. Doi, and R. M. Nishikawa.1994. Automated detection of clustered Microcalcifications. Proc. SPIE (Digital Mammograms using Wavelet Transform Tech., Med. Imag. 1994: Image Process.), vol. 2167, pp. 868–886.
  15. H. Yoshida, K. Doi, R. M. Nishikawa, M. L. Giger, and R. A. Schmidt. 1996. An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Acad. Radiol., vol. 3, pp. 621–627.
  16. Damir Sersic and Sven Loncaric..1998. Enhancement of Mammographic Images for Detection of Microcalcifications. Fac. of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, Croatia.
  17. A.F. Laine, S. Schuler, J. Fan, and W. Huda. 1994. Mammographic feature enhancement by multiscale analysis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 13,no. 4, pp. 725–740.
  18. A.F. Laine, J. Fan, andW. Yang. 1995. Wavelets for contrast enhancement of digital mammography. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.,vol. 14, no.5, pp. 536–550.
  19. Chun-Ming Chang and Andrew Laine. 1999. Coherence Of Multiscale Features for Enhancement of Digital Mammograms. IEEE Tran. on Information Technology in Biomedical, vol. 3, pp. 32-46.
  20. Y. Sato, C.-F. Westin, A. Bhalerao, S. Nakajima,N.Shiraga, S. Yoshida, and R. Kikinis .2000. Tissue classification based on 3D local intensity structures for volume rendering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 6(2):160–180.
  21. Frangi, W. Niessen, K. Vincken, and M. Viergever. 1998. Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. Medical Image Computing and Computer - Assisted Intervention – MICCAI’98,(1496):130–137.
  22. K. Krissian, G. Malandain, N. Ayache, R. Vaillant, and Y.Trousset . 2000. Model based detection of tubular structures in 3D images. Comp. Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 130-171, November 2000
  23. Sato Yoshinobu, et al.: 3D Multi-Scale Line Filter for Segmentation and Visualization of Curvilinear Structures in Medical Images, in proc. of the First Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medial Robotics and Computer-Assisted Surgery, vol 1205 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 213–222, Mar. 1997
  24. D.Esteban, C.Galand :1977. Application of Quadrature mirror filter to split Band Voice Coding Schemes. Proc. IEEE ICASSP’77,pp.191-195.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) Hessian matrix Multiscale product Microcalcification detection