CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

An Impact-based Analysis of Software Reengineering Risk in Quality Perspective of legacy System

by Er. Anand Rajavat, Dr. Vrinda Tokekar
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 33 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Er. Anand Rajavat, Dr. Vrinda Tokekar
10.5120/4046-5794

Er. Anand Rajavat, Dr. Vrinda Tokekar . An Impact-based Analysis of Software Reengineering Risk in Quality Perspective of legacy System. International Journal of Computer Applications. 33, 9 ( November 2011), 40-47. DOI=10.5120/4046-5794

@article{ 10.5120/4046-5794,
author = { Er. Anand Rajavat, Dr. Vrinda Tokekar },
title = { An Impact-based Analysis of Software Reengineering Risk in Quality Perspective of legacy System },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2011 },
volume = { 33 },
number = { 9 },
month = { November },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 40-47 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume33/number9/4046-5794/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4046-5794 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:19:56.798429+05:30
%A Er. Anand Rajavat
%A Dr. Vrinda Tokekar
%T An Impact-based Analysis of Software Reengineering Risk in Quality Perspective of legacy System
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 33
%N 9
%P 40-47
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Reengineering of operational legacy system is a novel technique for software rejuvenation. Reengineering is used specifically to satisfy and even delight modern customers and market with the value of our software products and services to gain their loyalty and repeat business. However, it incurs some overhead in terms of risk. The basic necessity for the successful implementation of reengineering strategy is to measure the overall impact of different reengineering risk components that arises from system, managerial and technical domain of legacy system. Quantifiable risk measures are necessary for the measurement of reengineering risk to take decision about when the evolution of legacy system through reengineering is successful. We present a quantifiable measurement model to measure comprehensive impact of different reengineering risk arises from quality perspective of legacy system. The model consists of five reengineering risk component, including Maintainability risk, Project complexity risk, Software architecture risk, Training Risk and Security risk component .Proposed measurement model offers better performance in terms of risk measurement to support the decision-making process.

References
  1. Brodie, M. L., Stonebraker, M., “Migrating Legacy Systems: Gateways, Interfaces, & the Incremental Approach,” Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.; 1995.
  2. Byrne, E.J. Gustafson, D.A.,” A software re-engineering process model”, in Proceeding of, Sixteenth Annual International Conference on Computer Software and Applications, Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/CMPSAC.1992.217608 , ISBN: 0-8186-3000-0 ,1992 , PP 25-30.
  3. Bianchi, A., Caivano, D., Marengo, V., Visaggio, G.,” Iterative reengineering of legacy functions”, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/ICSM.2001.972780, ISBN: 0-7695-1189-9 2001, PP 632-641.
  4. Anand Rajavat, Dr. (Mrs.) Vrinda Tokekar, “SysRisk –A Decisional Framework to Measure System Dimensions of Legacy Application for Rejuvenation through Reengineering”, Published in International Journal of Computer Applications (IJCA), 16(2):16–19, February 2011, ISBN: 978-93-80747-56-8, Doi 10.5120/1985-2674.
  5. Anand Rajavat, Dr. (Mrs.) Vrinda Tokekar, “ReeRisk –A Decisional Risk Engineering Framework for Legacy System Rejuvenation through Reengineering”, Published in Proceedings of Second International Conference on Recent Trends in Information, Telecommunication and Computing – ITC 2011 by Springer LNCS-CCIS, March 10-11, 2011 in Bengaluru, India, CNC 2011, CCIS 142, pp. 152 – 158, 2011, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011.
  6. Victor R. Basili1, Gianluigi Caldiera1 H., Dieter Rombach,” The Goal Question Metric Approach”, technical report, department of computer science, institute for advanced computer studies, university of Maryland.
  7. Linda Westfall,” Kiviat Charts”, technical report, the west fall team, partnering for software excellence.
  8. Huang, Y.; Kintala, C.; Kolettis, N.; Fulton, N.D.,” Software rejuvenation: Analysis, Modeling, and applications”, Twenty-Fifth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, 1995. FTCS-25. Digest of Papers, Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/FTCS.1995.466961, 1995, Pp381-390.
  9. Trivedi, K.S.; Vaidyanathan, K.; Goseva-Popstojanova, K,” Modeling and analysis of software aging and rejuvenation”, Proceedings. 33rd Annual Simulation Symposium, 2000, Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/SIMSYM.2000.844925, 2000, pp270-279.
  10. Yan Gong; Fangchun Yang; Lin Huang; Sen Su,” Model-Based Approach to Measuring quality Of Experience”, First International Conference on Emerging Network Intelligence, Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/EMERGING.2009.17,2009,PP:29-32.
  11. Stephen H. Kan,” Metrics and Models in Software Quality”, Addison-Wesley Professional, 2 nd Edition, ISBN-10: 0-201-72915-6, 2003.
  12. Thomas J. McCabe, “Design complexity measurement and testing”, Communications of the ACM, doi 10.1145/76380.76382, Volume 32 Issue 12, Dec. 1989.
  13. Nary Subramanian, Lawrence Chung,” Metrics for Software Adaptability”, Technical report, Applied Technology Division, Anritsu Company, 1999.
  14. Robert O. Brinkerhoff, Dennis Dressler,” Using evaluation to build organizational performance and learning capability: A strategy and a method”, Article, Performance Improvement, DOI: 10.1002/pfi.4140410605, Volume 41, Issue 6, pages 14–21, July 2002.
  15. John Murdoch,” Security Measurement”, White Paper, V3.0 13 January 2006.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Reengineering Risk Engineering Measurement

Powered by PhDFocusTM