CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Article:Efficient approach to Normalization of Multimodal Biometric Scores

by S.Thangasamy, L.Latha
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 32 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: S.Thangasamy, L.Latha
10.5120/3952-5530

S.Thangasamy, L.Latha . Article:Efficient approach to Normalization of Multimodal Biometric Scores. International Journal of Computer Applications. 32, 10 ( October 2011), 57-64. DOI=10.5120/3952-5530

@article{ 10.5120/3952-5530,
author = { S.Thangasamy, L.Latha },
title = { Article:Efficient approach to Normalization of Multimodal Biometric Scores },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { October 2011 },
volume = { 32 },
number = { 10 },
month = { October },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 57-64 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume32/number10/3952-5530/ },
doi = { 10.5120/3952-5530 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:18:54.450651+05:30
%A S.Thangasamy
%A L.Latha
%T Article:Efficient approach to Normalization of Multimodal Biometric Scores
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 32
%N 10
%P 57-64
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Information fusion at the matching score level is widely used, due to the simplicity in combining the scores generated by different matchers. Since the matching scores output by various modalities are diverse in numerical range, score normalization is needed first, to transform these scores into a common domain. Then score fusion is to be carried out on the normalized scores. In this paper, we have studied the performance of different normalization techniques and fusion rules in the context of a multimodal biometric system based on iris and palm print traits of a user. The conventional normalization techniques used for testing are min-max, median-MAD, double-sigmoid and tanh. These normalized results are combined using tanh, mean, sum, product, min, max and median fusion methods. Also, we propose two novel normalization methods namely modified tanh normalization and max normalization as well as a new modified min-max fusion technique for biometric verification. The experimental results on CASIA iris and palm print databases show that the application of proposed max and modified tanh normalization schemes followed by mean and tanh fusion methods result in better recognition performance compared to all other methods.

References
  1. Jain.A.K, A.Ross, S.Prabhakar, 2004. An introduction to biometric recognition, IEEE Trans. Circuits Systems Video Technol. 14 (1) 4–20.
  2. Jain.A.K and A.Ross, 2003. Information fusion in biometrics, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 24(13), 2115–2125
  3. Hong.L, Jain.A.K, S. Pankanti, 1999. Can multibiometrics improve performance? in: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Advanced Technologies, NJ, USA, 59–64.
  4. Kittler.J, M.Hatef, R.Duin, and J.Matas. 1998. On Combining Classifiers, IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(3)
  5. Ben-Yacoub, Abdeljaoued and Mayoraz, 1999. Fusion of Face and Speech Data for Person Identity Verification.
  6. Fierrez-Aguilar.J, Ortega-Garcia.J, Garcia-Romero.D and J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez. 2003. A comparative evaluation of fusion strategies for multimodal biometric verification, Proc. 4th IAPR Intl. Conf. on Audio- and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication, AVBPA, Springer LNCS-2688, 830-837.
  7. Dass, K.Nandakumar and A.K.Jain. 2005. A principled approach to score level fusion in multimodal biometric systems, in: Proceedings of AVBPA, Rye Brook, 1049–1058.
  8. Mink.A, R.Snelick, U.Uludag, M.Indovina, and A.Jain, 2005. Large scale evaluation of multimodal biometric authentication using state-of-the-art systems, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(3), 450-455.
  9. Masi.D, H.Korves, L.Nadel, B.Ulery. 2005. Multi-Biometric Fusion: From Research to Operations, Sigma.
  10. Jain.A.K, and Jianjiang Feng, 2009. Latent Palmprint Matching, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(6).
  11. Park.H.A and K.R.Park, 2007. Iris recognition based on score level fusion by using SVM, Pattern Recognition Letters, 28(15), pp. 2019–2028.
  12. Nandakumar, Jain, Ross. 2005. Score Normalization in Multimodal Biometric Systems, Pattern Recognition 38, 2270-2285.
  13. Dass,S.C, K.Nandakumar, Y.Chen and A.K.Jain. 2008. Likelihood ratio-based biometric score fusion, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 30 (2), 342–347.
  14. Bergamini.C, et al. 2009. Combining different biometric traits with one-class classification, Signal Processing, 89 (11), 2117–2127.
  15. CASIA Iris Image Database, (2007). http://www.sinobiometrics.com.
  16. Palm print database, (2007). http://www.sinobiometrics.com.
  17. Prabhakar.S, S.Pankanti, A.K.Jain, 2003. Biometric Recognition: Security and Privacy Concerns, IEEE Security & Privacy, pp. 33-42
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Iris Multimodal biometrics Normalization Palm print ROC Score level fusion