CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Image Segmentation by Clustering Methods: Performance Analysis

by B.Sathya, R.Manavalan
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 29 - Number 11
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: B.Sathya, R.Manavalan
10.5120/3688-5127

B.Sathya, R.Manavalan . Image Segmentation by Clustering Methods: Performance Analysis. International Journal of Computer Applications. 29, 11 ( September 2011), 27-32. DOI=10.5120/3688-5127

@article{ 10.5120/3688-5127,
author = { B.Sathya, R.Manavalan },
title = { Image Segmentation by Clustering Methods: Performance Analysis },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2011 },
volume = { 29 },
number = { 11 },
month = { September },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 27-32 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume29/number11/3688-5127/ },
doi = { 10.5120/3688-5127 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:15:33.412630+05:30
%A B.Sathya
%A R.Manavalan
%T Image Segmentation by Clustering Methods: Performance Analysis
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 29
%N 11
%P 27-32
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Image segmentation plays a significant role in computer vision. It aims at extracting meaningful objects lying in the image. Generally there is no unique method or approach for image segmentation. Clustering is a powerful technique that has been reached in image segmentation. The cluster analysis is to partition an image data set into a number of disjoint groups or clusters. The clustering methods such as k means, improved k mean, fuzzy c mean (FCM) and improved fuzzy c mean algorithm (IFCM) have been proposed. K means clustering is one of the popular method because of its simplicity and computational efficiency. The number of iterations will be reduced in improved K compare to conventional K means. FCM algorithm has additional flexibility for the pixels to belong to multiple classes with varying degrees of membership. Demerit of conventional FCM is time consuming which is overcome by improved FCM. The experimental results exemplify that the proposed algorithms yields segmented gray scale image of perfect accuracy and the required computer time reasonable and also reveal the improved fuzzy c mean achieve better segmentation compare to others. The quality of segmented image is measured by statistical parameters: rand index (RI), global consistency error (GCE), variations of information (VOI) and boundary displacement error (BDE).

References
  1. Krishna Kant Singh , Akansha Singh,A Study Of Image Segmentation Algorithms For Different Types Of Images IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues 2010
  2. F. MarquCs B. Marcotenui, F. Zanoguera, partion based image representation as basis for user assisted image segmentation,2000
  3. U.M. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, P. Smyth, R. Uthurusamy, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,AAAI/MIT Press (1996)
  4. M.N. Murty, A.K. Jain, P.J. Flynn, Data clustering: a review, ACM Comput. Surv. 31(3) (1999) 264-323
  5. A.K. Jain, R.C. Dubes, Algorithms for Clustering Data,Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ(1988)
  6. R.T. Ng, J. Han, Efficient and effective clustering methods for spatial data mining, in: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Very Large Databases, Santiago,Chile(1994) 144-155620
  7. Su, M.C., Chou, C.H., A modified version of the K-means algorithm with a distance based on cluster symmetry. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intel, 23(6)(2001) 674-680
  8. Xiuyun Li, Jie Yang, Qing Wang, Jinjin Fan, Peng Liu,2010 Research and Application of Improved K-means Algorithm Based on Fuzzy Feature Selection
  9. Kuo-Liang Chung, Keng-Sheng Lin, An efficient line symmetry-based K-means algorithm, Pattern Recognition Lett, 27(2006) 765-772
  10. Sugar, S.A., James, G.M., Finding the number of clusters in a dataset: an information-theoretic approach. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 98(2003) 750-763
  11. Kanugo, T., Mount, D.M., Netanyahu, N.S., Piatko, C.D., Silverman, R., Wu, A.Y., An efficient K-means algorithm: analysis and implementation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal.Mach. Intell. 24(2002) 881-892
  12. Mario G.C.A. Cimino, Beatrice Lazzerini and Francesco Marcelloni, A novel approach to fuzzy clustering based on a dissimilarity relation extracted from data using a TS system, Pattern Recognition, 39(11)(2006) 2077-2091
  13. Meila, M., Heckerman, D., An experimental comparison of several clustering methods, Microsoft Research Report MSR-TR-98-06, Redmond, WA.(1998)
  14. Shehroz S. Khan, Amir Ahmad,Cluster center initialization algorithm for K-means clustering, Pattern Recognition Letters 25 (2004) 1293-1302
  15. Bradley, P.S., Fayyad, U.M., Refining initial points for Kmeans clustering. In: Sharlik, J. (Ed.), Proc. 15th Internat. Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML98). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA,(1998) 91-99 621
  16. K.S.Ravichandran and B. Ananthi,” Color Skin Segmentation Using K-Means” Cluster International Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics ISSN 1819-4966 Volume 4 Number 2 (2009), pp. 153–157
  17. Jude hemanth.D, D.Selvathi and J.Anitha,“Effective Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm for Abnormal MR Brain Image Segmentation”, International/Advance Computing Conference (IACC 2009), IEEE, 2009.
  18. Sorin Istrail, “An Overview of Clustering Methods”, With Applications to Bioinformatics.
  19. Shahram Rahimi, M. Zarghamy A. Thakrez D. Chhillar,”A Parallel Fuzzy C Mean algorithm for Image Segmentation”.
  20. P. Vasuda et. al. / (IJCSE) International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering 2010, Improved Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm for MR BrainImage Segmentation
  21. R. Unnikrishnan, C. Pantofaru, and M. Hebert, “Toward objective evaluation of image segmentation algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 929–944, Jun. 2007.
  22. F. Ge, S.Wang, and T. Liu, “New benachmark for image segmentation evaluation,” J. Elect. Imag., vol. 16, no. 3, Jul.–Sep. 2007.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

K means improved k means fuzzy c means improved c means rand index global consistency error variations of information