CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Comparison of Wavelet Transform and Contourlet Transform based methods for Despeckling Medical Ultrasound Images

by P.S. Hiremath, Prema T. Akkasaligar, Sharan Badiger
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 26 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: P.S. Hiremath, Prema T. Akkasaligar, Sharan Badiger
10.5120/3130-4313

P.S. Hiremath, Prema T. Akkasaligar, Sharan Badiger . Performance Comparison of Wavelet Transform and Contourlet Transform based methods for Despeckling Medical Ultrasound Images. International Journal of Computer Applications. 26, 9 ( July 2011), 34-41. DOI=10.5120/3130-4313

@article{ 10.5120/3130-4313,
author = { P.S. Hiremath, Prema T. Akkasaligar, Sharan Badiger },
title = { Performance Comparison of Wavelet Transform and Contourlet Transform based methods for Despeckling Medical Ultrasound Images },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { July 2011 },
volume = { 26 },
number = { 9 },
month = { July },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 34-41 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume26/number9/3130-4313/ },
doi = { 10.5120/3130-4313 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:12:22.136953+05:30
%A P.S. Hiremath
%A Prema T. Akkasaligar
%A Sharan Badiger
%T Performance Comparison of Wavelet Transform and Contourlet Transform based methods for Despeckling Medical Ultrasound Images
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 26
%N 9
%P 34-41
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The widespread usage of ultrasound imaging equipment necessitates the need for better image processing techniques to offer a clearer image to the medical practitioner. This makes the use of efficient despeckle filtering a very important task. The speckle is most often considered a dominant source of multiplicative noise in ultrasound imaging and should be filtered out without affecting important features of the image. The objective of the paper is to compare performance of the multiscale methods, namely, wavelet transform, Laplacian pyramid transform and contourlet transform for despeckling medical ultrasound images. The effects of different thresholding techniques using Bayes shrinkage rule for denoising ultrasound images are examined. The despeckled image quality is evaluated using filter assessment parameters like variance, Mean-Square Error (MSE), Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Correlation Coefficient (CC). The performance comparison of multi-scale schemes shows that contourlet transform based despeckling method excels over the other two transform based despeckling methods. Extensive experimentation has been carried out for comparative analysis of performance of the methods.

References
  1. Paul Suetens,2002,“Fundamentals of Medical Imaging”, 1st Edition, Cambridge University, U.K., pp.145-182.
  2. S. Kalaivani Narayanan and R.S.D.Wahidabanu 2009, A View of Despeckling in Ultrasound Imaging. Signal Processing, Image processing and Pattern Recognition (3),pp.85-98.
  3. N.K.Ragesh, A.R.Anil and R.Rajesh, 2011, Digital Image Denoising in Medical Ultrasound images: A Survey, ICGST AIML-11 Conference, Dubai, UAE, 12-14 April 2011,pp.67-73.
  4. P.S.Hiremath, Prema T.Akkasaligar, Sharan Badiger, 2010, Visual Enhancement of Digital Ultrasound Images using Multiscale Wavelet Domain, Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 20(3),pp. 303-315.
  5. Alin Achim , Anastasios Bezerianos , Panagiotis Tsakalides, 2001 Novel Bayesian Multiscale Method for Speckle Removal in Medical Ultrasound Images IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 20,pp.772-783.
  6. A. Pizurica , W.Philips, Marc Acheroy, 2003 , A Versatile Wavelet Domain Noise Filtration Technique for Medical Imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 22, pp.323-331.
  7. Nikhil gupta and M.N.Swamy,2005, Despeckling of Medical Ultrasound Images Using Data and Rate Adaptive Lossy Compression,IEEE Trans.Medical Imaging, vol.24, No.6, pp.682-695.
  8. Minh N. Do, Martin Vetterli.2003, Contourlets, In: Beyond Wavelets, G.V.Well, J Stoeckerand, (eds) Academic Press, pp.1-27.
  9. Mao-yu-Huang, yueh-Min Huang and Ming-Shi Wang ,2004,Speckle reduction of ultrasound image based on contourlet transform, Int. Computer Symposium , Dec. 15-17, 2004, Taipei, Taiwan. pp.178-182.
  10. P.S.Hiremath, Prema T. Akkasaligar, Sharan Badiger. 2009, Despeckling Medical Ultrasound Images Using the Contourlet Transform. In: Proceedings of the 4th AMS Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IICAI) ; pp.1814-27.
  11. K.Thangavel, R.Manavalan andI.Laurence, 2009, A.Removal of Speckle Noise from Ultrasoun Medical Image based on Special Filters: Comparative study, ICGST GVIP Journal ISSN1687-398x, vol.9,issue 3, pp.25-32.
  12. Wan Mahani Hafizah and Eko Supriyanto,2011, Comparative Evaluation of Ultrasound Kidney Image Enhancement Techniques, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) vol.21, No.7, pp.15-19.
  13. Mariana C.N., Luminita M. and Laura O, 2010, Comparative Approach for Speckle Reduction in Medical Ultrasound Images”, Romanian J. Biophysics, Vol. 20, No.1 pp.13-21.
  14. Ali Saad, 2008 Simultenous Speckle Reduction and Constrast Enhancement for Ultrasound Images: Wavelet Versus Laplacian Pyramid”, Int.Jou. of Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, vol.18, No.1, pp.63-70.
  15. P. J. Burt and E. H. Adelson,1983, The Laplacian Pyramid as a compact image code, IEEE Trans.on Commun., vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 532-540.
  16. Minh N. Do, Martin Vetterli. 2005, The contourlet transform: Efficient directional Multiresolution Image Representation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14 ,pp.2091-2106.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Despeckling Wavelet transform Contourlet transform Laplacian pyramid transform