CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Trusted Network Selection using SAW and TOPSIS Algorithms for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks

by K.Savitha, C.Chandrasekar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 26 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: K.Savitha, C.Chandrasekar
10.5120/3125-4300

K.Savitha, C.Chandrasekar . Trusted Network Selection using SAW and TOPSIS Algorithms for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 26, 8 ( July 2011), 22-29. DOI=10.5120/3125-4300

@article{ 10.5120/3125-4300,
author = { K.Savitha, C.Chandrasekar },
title = { Trusted Network Selection using SAW and TOPSIS Algorithms for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { July 2011 },
volume = { 26 },
number = { 8 },
month = { July },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 22-29 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume26/number8/3125-4300/ },
doi = { 10.5120/3125-4300 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:12:16.173673+05:30
%A K.Savitha
%A C.Chandrasekar
%T Trusted Network Selection using SAW and TOPSIS Algorithms for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 26
%N 8
%P 22-29
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Seamless continuity is the main goal in fourth generation Wireless networks (FGWNs), to achieve this “ HANDOVER” technique is used, when a mobile terminal(MT) is in overlapping area for service continuity, Handover mechanism are mainly used. In Heterogeneous wireless networks main challenge is continual connection among the different networks like WiFi, WiMax, WLAN, WPAN etc. In this paper, Vertical handover decision schemes are compared and Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) is used to choose the best network from the available Visitor networks (VTs) for the continuous connection by the mobile terminal. In our work we mainly concentrated to the handover decision phase and to reduce the processing delay in the period of handover. MADM algorithms SAW and TOPSIS where compared to reduce the processing delay by using NS2 to evaluate the parameters for processing delay.

References
  1. N.D.Tripathi, J.H.Reed and H.F.VanLandinoham, , “Handoff In Cellular System”, IEEE Personal Communications, Vol.49, 2000, pp.2276-2285,
  2. E.Gustafsson and Annika Jonsson, , Always Best Connected, IEEE Wireless Communications, Vol.10,No. 1, 2003, pp. 49-55,
  3. E.Steven-Navarro, V.W.S. Wong and Yuxia Lin, “A Vertical Handoff Decision Algorithm For Heterogeneous Wireless Networks”, Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, IEEE, Kowloon 2007, pp. 3199-3204.
  4. E.steven-Navarro and V.W.S.Wong, , “Comparison between vertical handoff decision algorithms for heterogeneous wireless network”, Vehicular Technology Conference, IEEE 63rd ,Melbourne, Vic. , 2006, pp.947-951.
  5. Wenhui Zhang, “ Handover Decision Using Fuzzy MADM In Heterogeneous Networks”, Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, IEEE, Vol.2, 2004, pp. 653-658.
  6. R.Tawil, G.Pujolle and O.Salazar, , A Vertical “Handoff Decision Schemes In Heterogeneous Wireless Systems”, Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC Spring 2008. IEEE , Singapore , 2008,pp. 2626-2630.
  7. R.Tawil, J.Demerjain, G.Pujolle And O.Salazar, “Processing-Delay Reduction During The Vertical Handoff Decision In Heterogeneous Wireless System” International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA IEEE/ACS 2008, pp.381-385.
  8. R.Tawil, J.Demerjain and G.Pujolle, “A Trusted Handoff Decision Scheme For The Next Generation Wireless Networks”, IJCSNS, Vol.8, 2008, pp.174-182.
  9. R.Tawil, G.Pujolle and O.Salazar, “Vertical Handoff Decision Schemes For The Next Generation Wireless Networks”, Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2008, pp. 2789-2792.
  10. R.Tawil, G.Pujolle and J.Demerjain, “Distributed Handoff Decision Scheme Using MIH Function For The Fourth Generation Wireless Networks”, 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications, 2008, pp. 1-6.
  11. Lusheng Wang and David Binet, “MADM- Based Network Selection In Heterogeneous Wireless Networks: A Simulation Study”, 1st International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology, 2009, pp. 559-564.
  12. N.Nasser, A.Hasswa and H.Hassanein, “Handoff In Fourth Generation Heterogeneous Networks”, Communications Magazine, IEEE , Vol.44, 2006, pp. 96-103.
  13. J.D Martinez- Morales, V.P.rico, E.Steven, “Performance comparison between MADM algorithms for vertical handoff in 4G networks”, 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE), 2010, pp. 309-314.
  14. M.Kassar, B.Kervella, G.Pujolle, “An overview of vertical handover decision strategies in heterogeneous wireless networks”, Elsevier, Journal of computer communications, Vol.37, No.10, 2008.
  15. D.L.Olson, “Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models’, J Mathematical and computer modelling, 2000, pp. 40721-727.
  16. K.Savitha, C.Chandrasekar, “Comparison of Vertical Handoff Decision Scheme in Heterogeneous Wireless Network”, IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence And Computing Research, 2010, pp. 1-6.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Handover Vertical handover decision schemes Multi attribute decision making