We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Analysis of DSR, AODV Routing Protocols based on Wormhole Attack in Mobile Ad-hoc Network

by Gunjesh Kant Singh, Harminder Singh Bindra, A. L. Sangal
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 26 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Gunjesh Kant Singh, Harminder Singh Bindra, A. L. Sangal
10.5120/3096-4248

Gunjesh Kant Singh, Harminder Singh Bindra, A. L. Sangal . Performance Analysis of DSR, AODV Routing Protocols based on Wormhole Attack in Mobile Ad-hoc Network. International Journal of Computer Applications. 26, 5 ( July 2011), 38-41. DOI=10.5120/3096-4248

@article{ 10.5120/3096-4248,
author = { Gunjesh Kant Singh, Harminder Singh Bindra, A. L. Sangal },
title = { Performance Analysis of DSR, AODV Routing Protocols based on Wormhole Attack in Mobile Ad-hoc Network },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { July 2011 },
volume = { 26 },
number = { 5 },
month = { July },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 38-41 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume26/number5/3096-4248/ },
doi = { 10.5120/3096-4248 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:12:02.075158+05:30
%A Gunjesh Kant Singh
%A Harminder Singh Bindra
%A A. L. Sangal
%T Performance Analysis of DSR, AODV Routing Protocols based on Wormhole Attack in Mobile Ad-hoc Network
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 26
%N 5
%P 38-41
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Mobile ad-hoc network are able work without any existing infrastructure. MANET is a self configure network connected by wireless links. Mobile ad-hoc network uses temporary network which is able to work without any centralize administration or stand alone infrastructure. In mobile ad-hoc network each device move in any direction without any restriction so it changes it links to often with other devices present in same network. Mobility of mobile device anywhere in the network without any centralize administration makes it difficult to manage routing. In mobile ad-hoc network each device need to forward traffic that is not related to its own use and therefore each device work as a router. In this paper we have compared the performance of two On-Demand MANET routing protocol AODV and DSR by using random waypoint mobility model and changing the node density with varying number of source node. DSR and AODV both protocol uses On-Demand route discovery concept but internal mechanism which they use to find the route is significantly different for both protocol. We have analyzed the performance of protocols for low and high node density (50 and 100 nodes) on a 750m*750m area with varying source node and random waypoint mobility model. Simulation with random waypoint mobility model has been carried out by using Qualnet 5.0.2 Simulator. The metrics used for performance evaluation are packet Delivery fraction, Average End-to-End Delay, Average Jitter, and number of packet dropped for buffer overflow.

References
  1. S. Das, C. E. Perkins, E. Royer, “Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing”, IETF Draft, June 2002
  2. C-K Toh “Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks Protocols and Systems”, First Edition, Prentice Hall Inc, USA, 2002
  3. C.E. Perkins and E.M.Royer, “Ad-Hoc On Demand Distance Vector Routing”, Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, New Orleans, LA, USA, pages 90-100, February 1999.
  4. Elizabeth M. Royer and Chai-Keong Toh, “A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks”, IEEE Personal Communications, pages 46-55, April 1999.
  5. Fan Bai, Ahmed Helmy “A Framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing Protocols for Adhoc Networks”, IEEE INFOCOM 2003
  6. Tracy Camp, Jeff Boleng, Vanessa Davies “A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research”, Wireless Communication & Mobile Computing (WCMC): vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 483-502, 2002
  7. D. Johnson, Dave Maltz, Y Hu, Jorjeta Jetcheva, “The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, Internet Draft, February 2002
  8. Suresh Kumar, R.K. Rathy and Diwakar Pandey, “Traffic Pattern Based Performance Comparison of Two Reactive Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks using NS2”, 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, 2009.
  9. D. Johnson, Y. Hu, and D. Maltz, “The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile”, RFC 4728, Feb 2007
  10. S.Corson and J.Macker, “Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation considerations”, RFC2501, IETF Network Working Group, January 1999.
  11. S. R. Biradar, Hiren H D Sharma, Kalpana Shrama and Subir Kumar Sarkar, “Performance Comparison of Reactive Routing Protocols of MANETs using Group Mobility Model”, IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing Systems, pages 192-195 2009.
  12. C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, S. Das, quet, “Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing”, RFC 3561, July 2003
  13. N.Aschenbruck,E.Gerhands-Padilla ,P.Martini,”A Survey on mobility models for Performance analysis in Tactical Mobile networks,” Journal of Telecommunication and Information Technology,Vol.2 pp.54-61,2008
  14. X. Hong, M. Gerla, G. Pei, and C.-C. Chiang, “A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks,” in ACM/IEEE MSWiM, August 1999.
  15. Bai, Fan; Helmy, Ahmed (2006). A Survey of Mobility Models in Wireless Adhoc Networks. (Chapter 1 in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks. Kluwer Academic. 2006.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET AODV DSR IMPORTANT TCP CBR Random waypoint Mobility Model