CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Survey on TCP Friendly Congestion Control for Unicast and Multicast Traffic

by Nikhil Singhal, R.M. Sharma
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 26 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Nikhil Singhal, R.M. Sharma
10.5120/3068-4194

Nikhil Singhal, R.M. Sharma . Survey on TCP Friendly Congestion Control for Unicast and Multicast Traffic. International Journal of Computer Applications. 26, 1 ( July 2011), 23-30. DOI=10.5120/3068-4194

@article{ 10.5120/3068-4194,
author = { Nikhil Singhal, R.M. Sharma },
title = { Survey on TCP Friendly Congestion Control for Unicast and Multicast Traffic },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { July 2011 },
volume = { 26 },
number = { 1 },
month = { July },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 23-30 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume26/number1/3068-4194/ },
doi = { 10.5120/3068-4194 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:11:41.617389+05:30
%A Nikhil Singhal
%A R.M. Sharma
%T Survey on TCP Friendly Congestion Control for Unicast and Multicast Traffic
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 26
%N 1
%P 23-30
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Increasing popularity of real time traffic application has lead to increase in non TCP traffic over the internet. These non TCP applications does not provide adequate congestion control compared to TCP application sharing same network thus available bandwidth is shared unfairly and may lead to stall of TCP traffic. Many TCP-Friendly protocols have been proposed that can share the available bandwidth with TCP traffic fairly and in such a way that Non TCP flow have same throughput as TCP one when are under same network conditions. These schemes have different characteristic and are best suited for different network conditions. In this paper we discuss various available TCP friendly schemes and discuss their features.

References
  1. Floyd, S., Handley, M., Padhye, J., and Widemer, J. 2000. Equation-based Congestion Control for Unicast Applications. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM (Aug. 2000), 43–56.
  2. Kwon, G.I. and Byers, J. 2003. Smooth multirate multicast congestion control. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (April 2003), 1022-1032.
  3. Widmer, J., Denda, R., and Mauve, M. 2001. A survey on TCP- Friendly Congestion Control. Network, IEEE (May 2001), 28-37.
  4. Wang, H.A. and Schwartz, M. 1998. Achieving Bounded Fairness for Multicast and TCP traffic in the Internet, Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM (Oct 1998).
  5. Braden, B., Clark, D., Crowcroft, J., Davie, B., Deering, S., Estrin, D., Floyd, S., Jacobson, V., Minshall, G., Partridge, C., Peterson, L., Ramakrishnan, K., Shenker, S., Wroclawski, J., and Zhang. L. 1998. Recommendations on Queue Management and Congestion Avoidance in the Internet. RFC 2309 (Informational, Apr. 1998).
  6. Floyd, S. and Jacson, V. 1993. Random Early Detection gateways for congestion avoidance. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 397-413.
  7. Bhattacharyya, S., Towsley, D., and Kurose, J. 2001. A novel loss indication filtering approach for multicast congestion control. Computer Communications (March 2001), 512-524.
  8. Trad, A. and Afifi, H. 2008. Voice-TFCC: a TCP-Friendly Congestion Control scheme for VoIP flows. IEEE PIMRC (Sept. 2008), 1-5.
  9. Xiao, P.P. and Tian, Y.T. 2007. A TCP-Friendly Congestion Control mechanism combined with the routers. IEEE ICMLC (Hong Kong, Aug 2007), 3223-3228.
  10. Ahmed, U and Salim, J. 2000. Performance Evaluation of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) in IP Networks. RFC 2884.
  11. Rizzo, L. 2000. PGMCC: A TCP-friendly single-rate multicast congestion control scheme. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM (Oct 2000).
  12. Jiang, L., Murat, Y., Xingzhe, F., and Shivkumar K. 2007. Generalized Multicast congestion control. Computer Networks 51, 1421-1443.
  13. Bhattacharyya, S., Towsley, D., and Kurose, J. 1999. The Loss Path Multiplicity Problem in Multicast Congestion Control. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM ( New York, NY,Mar. 1999), 856–863.
  14. Floyd, S., Handley, M., Padhye, J., and Widmer, J. 2008. TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification. RFC- 5348, (September 2008).
  15. Widmer, J. and Handley, M. 2006. TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC): Protocol Specification. RFC- 4654 (August 2006).
  16. Floyd, S., Handley, M., Padhye, J., and Widmer, J. 2003. TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification. RFC- 3448 (January 2003).
  17. Rhee, I., Ozdemir, V., and Yung, Y. 2000. TEAR: TCP emulation at receivers – flow control for multimedia streaming, Technical report, Department of Computer Science, NCSU (April 2000).
  18. Lai, Y.C. 2007. TCP Friendly congestion control to guarantee smoothness by Slack Term. Computer Communications, 341-350.
  19. Vicisano, L., Crowcroft, J., and Rizzo, L. 1998. TCP-like Congestion Control for Layered Multicast Data Transfer. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (March 1998), 996–1003.
  20. Feng, J. and Xu, L. 2009. Throughput-Smoothness Tradeoff in Preventing Competing TCP from Starvation. IEEE IWQoS (July 2009), 1-9.
  21. Chodorek, R.R. and Chodorek, A. 2009. ECN-capable TCP-friendly Layered Multicast Multimedia Delivery. IEEE UKSIM (March 2009), 553-558.
  22. Dreibholz, T., Becke, M., Pulinthanath, J., and Rathgeb, E.P. 2010. Applying TCP-Friendly Congestion Control to Concurrent Multipath Transfer. IEEE AINA (April 2010), 312-319.
  23. Martin, D., Pacheco, L., Lochin, E., Sarwar, G., and Roksana B. 2009. Understanding the impact of tfrc feedbacks frequency over long delay links. IEEE GIIS.
  24. Talaat, M.A., Koutb, M.A., and Sorour, H.S. 2011. ETFRC: Enhanced TFRC for Media Traffic. IJCA (March 2011).
  25. Huszak, A., and Imre, S. 2007. Tfrc-based selective retransmission for multimedia applications. In Proc. Advances in Mobile Multimedia, 53-64.
  26. Iyengar, J.R., Amer, P.D., and Stewart, R. 2006. Concurrent Multipath Transfer Using SCTP Multihoming Over Inde- pendent End-to-End Paths. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. 951–964.
  27. Stewart, R. 2007. Stream Control Transmission Protocol. IETF, Standards Track RFC 4960 (Sept. 2007).
  28. Wischik, D., Handley, M., and Braun, M.B. 2008. The Resource Pooling Principle. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication (October 2008), 47-52.
  29. Luby, M. and Goyal, V. 2004 .Wave and Equation Based Rate Control (WEBRC) Building Block. RFC 3738 (April 2004).
  30. Chodorek, R.R. 2002. A simulation of ECN-capable multicast multimedia delivery in ns-2 environment. Proc. of. 14th European Simulation (October 2002), 233-237.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Congestion control Multicast Unicast TCP-Friendly

Powered by PhDFocusTM