We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

Energy Aware QoS on-demand Routing Protocols for MANETs

by Humaira Nishat, Dr.D.Srinivas Rao
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 23 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Humaira Nishat, Dr.D.Srinivas Rao
10.5120/2908-3820

Humaira Nishat, Dr.D.Srinivas Rao . Energy Aware QoS on-demand Routing Protocols for MANETs. International Journal of Computer Applications. 23, 8 ( June 2011), 12-17. DOI=10.5120/2908-3820

@article{ 10.5120/2908-3820,
author = { Humaira Nishat, Dr.D.Srinivas Rao },
title = { Energy Aware QoS on-demand Routing Protocols for MANETs },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { June 2011 },
volume = { 23 },
number = { 8 },
month = { June },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 12-17 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume23/number8/2908-3820/ },
doi = { 10.5120/2908-3820 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:09:45.847304+05:30
%A Humaira Nishat
%A Dr.D.Srinivas Rao
%T Energy Aware QoS on-demand Routing Protocols for MANETs
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 23
%N 8
%P 12-17
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Mobile nodes in an ad hoc wireless network have limited battery power. These nodes need to be energy conserved to maximize the battery life. Thus, development of energy efficient routing protocols is needed due to the limited battery power of all nodes. In this paper, we have considered two on-demand routing protocols- AODV & DSR for mobile ad hoc networks and evaluated the energy performance metrics in all the four modes (transmitting, receiving, idle & sleep) and the residual energy. We have also evaluated other performance metrics such as packet delivery fraction, throughput and end-to-end delay for both protocols. The simulation has been carried out using ns2. Finally, by the observations we conclude that DSR offers the best combination of energy consumption and throughput performance. AODV gives better packet delivery fraction and delay performance compared to DSR in a more stressful conditions i.e., more number of nodes.

References
  1. C.K. Toh “Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks Protocols and Systems”, First Edition, Prentice Hall Inc, USA 2002.
  2. Elizabeth M.Royer and Chai-Keong Toh, “A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks”, IEEE Personal Communications, Pages 46-55, April 1999.
  3. J.Macker and S.Carson, “Mobile Ad Hoc Networks(MANET)” http://www.ietf.org/htm;.charters/manet-charter.html, 1997. IETF Working Group Charter.
  4. David Maltz, Josh Broch, Jorjeta Jetcheva and David Johnson “The effects of on-demand behavior in routing protocols for multihop wireless ad hoc networks”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 1999 to appear.
  5. Mohammed Bouhorma, H. Bentaouit and A. Boudhir “Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols AODV and DSR”, IEEE 2009.
  6. S.R.Biradar, Hiren H.D.Sharma, Kalpana Sharma and Subir Kumar Sarkar, “Performance Comparison of Reactive Routing Protocols of MANETs Using Group Mobility Model”, IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing Systems, pages 192-195, 2009.
  7. Suresh Kumar, R.K.Rathy and Diwakar Pandey, “Traffic Pattern Based Performance Comparison of Two Routing Protocols for Ad hoc Networks Using NS2”, 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, 2009.
  8. Zuraida Binti Abdullah Hani and Mohd. Dani Bin Baba, “Designing Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, IEEE 2003.
  9. Thomas Heide clausen, Phillipe Jacquel and Laurent Viennot, “Comparative Study of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”.
  10. Wang Lin-Zhu, Fang Ya-qin and Shan Min, “Performance Comparison of Two Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks”, WASE International Conference on Information Engineering, 2009.
  11. C.Mbarushimana and A.Shahrabi, “Comparative Study of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols Performance in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, AINAW-IEEE, 2007.
  12. Md. Golam Kaosar, Hafiz M. Asif, Tarek R, Sheltami, Ashraf S. Hasan Mahmoud, “Simulation Based Comparative Study of On-Demand Routing Protocols for MANET”.
  13. C.Perkins, E.Belding-Royer, S.Das,Quet, “Ad Hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing(AODV)”, RFC3561, July 2003.
  14. S.Corson and J.Macker, “Routing Protocol performance Issues and Evalaution Considerations”, RFC2501, IETF Network Working Group, January 1999.
  15. S.Das, C.E.Perkins, E.Royer, “Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector(AODV) Routing”, IETF Draft, June 2002.
  16. C.Perkins and E.Royer, “Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector Routing,” Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications(WMCSA 1999) pp.99-100, Feb-1999.
  17. D.B.Johnson, D.A.Maltz and J.Broch, “DSR: The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks”, Ad Hoc Networking, pp 139-172, 2001.
  18. D.Johnson, Y.Hu & D.Maltz, “The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol(DSR) for Mobile” , RFC 4728, Feb 2007.
  19. UCB/LBNL/VINT Network Simulator, http://wwwmash.cs.berkeley.edu/ns/referred on March 2010.
  20. “The Network Simulator- ns-2”, available at http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/referred on march 2010.
  21. L.M.Feeney and M. Nilsson, “Investigating the Energy Consumption of a Wireless Interface in an AD Hoc Networking Environment”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Volume 3, Anchorage A.K. April 2001, pages 1548-1557.
  22. L.M.Freeney, “An Energy Consumption Model for Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad hoc Networks”, Mobile Networks and Applications, Volume 6, Issue 3, June 2001, Pages 239-249.
  23. A Safwat, H. Hassanein and H. Mouftah, “Energy aware Routing in MANETs: Analysis and Enhancements”, Proceedings of The Fifth ACM International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems(MSWiM 2002) in conjunction with the ACM Mobile Computing and Networking Conference, Atlanta, Georgia,USA, September 2002, pages 46-53.
  24. Harminder S.Bindra, Sunil K.Maakar and A.L.Sangal, “Performance Evaluation of Two Reactive Routing Protocols of MANET using Group Mobility Model”, International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol.7, Issue 3, No.10, May 2010.
  25. M. Li, L. Zhang, V. O. K. Li, X. Shan and Y. Ren, “An Energy-Aware Multipath Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Asia, April 2005.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Energy consumption throughput packet delivery fraction end-to-end delay