CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Comparison and Analysis of PIM-DM and BST Multicasting Network over Drop Tail Queuing Technology

by Ashish Kumar, Ajay K Sharma, Arun Singh
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 22 - Number 6
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Ashish Kumar, Ajay K Sharma, Arun Singh
10.5120/2587-3577

Ashish Kumar, Ajay K Sharma, Arun Singh . Comparison and Analysis of PIM-DM and BST Multicasting Network over Drop Tail Queuing Technology. International Journal of Computer Applications. 22, 6 ( May 2011), 29-33. DOI=10.5120/2587-3577

@article{ 10.5120/2587-3577,
author = { Ashish Kumar, Ajay K Sharma, Arun Singh },
title = { Comparison and Analysis of PIM-DM and BST Multicasting Network over Drop Tail Queuing Technology },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2011 },
volume = { 22 },
number = { 6 },
month = { May },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 29-33 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume22/number6/2587-3577/ },
doi = { 10.5120/2587-3577 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:08:42.263766+05:30
%A Ashish Kumar
%A Ajay K Sharma
%A Arun Singh
%T Comparison and Analysis of PIM-DM and BST Multicasting Network over Drop Tail Queuing Technology
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 22
%N 6
%P 29-33
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The paper contrast a Multicasting network using PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode) with BST (Bi-Directional Shared Tree) protocol using NS2. The networking topology is well analyzed for two sources and drop of data packet and throughput is recorded and drawn. The simulation results mark the decrease in drop out packets for BST by 55.88235% on node 0 and some increase in drop out packets at node 1.

References
  1. K. Almeroth, “The evolution of multicast: From the MBone to interdomain multicast to Internet2 deployment,” IEEE Network, vol. 14, pp. 10–20, January/February 2000.
  2. S S Nagamuthu Krishnan, Prof. (Dr).V Saravanan, “Defending Denial of Service: State Overload”, Int. J. Advanced Networking and Applications Volume: 02, Issue: 03, Pages: 719-722 (2010).
  3. Mona A. Abou-Of, “Dynamic Bi-directional Multicast Shared Tree”, 978-1-4244-5995-7/09@2009 IEEE.
  4. Huang Shao-bin, Wu Yan-xia, Piao Xiu-feng, “Performance comparison of multicast routing protocols based on NS-2”, Journal of Marine Science and Application, Vol. 4 No. 4, December 2005.
  5. RFE-3973, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3973.txt
  6. By Jim Guichard, Ivan Pepelnjak, Jeff Apcar, MPLS and VPN Architectures, Volume II, Cisco Press, June 06 2003, Page No 428.
  7. [y] T. Bhaskar Reddy, Ali Ahammed, Reshma banu, “Performance Comparison of Active Queue Management Techniques”, IJCSNC International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL.9 No.2, February 2009.
  8. S. mercy Shalinie, G. preetha, S. Dina Nidhya, Kiruthika Devi, “Fuzzy Adaptive Tuning of Router Buffers for Congestion Control”, International Journal of Advancements in Technology,Vol 1, No 1 (June 2010) @IJoAT.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

PIM-DM BST Drop Tail Data Multicasting NS2 Tracegraph