CFP last date
20 April 2026
Call for Paper
May Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming May edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 April 2026

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
A Hybrid Collaborative Clustering Approach for Noise-Robust Speech Recognition

Ameni Filali
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Individual Learning Style using Eye Tracking and Accelerometer

by Oluwatoyin C. Agbonifo, Gbolahan Kolawole
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 96
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Oluwatoyin C. Agbonifo, Gbolahan Kolawole
10.5120/ijca068216d8b6b5

Oluwatoyin C. Agbonifo, Gbolahan Kolawole . A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Individual Learning Style using Eye Tracking and Accelerometer. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 96 ( Apr 2026), 60-70. DOI=10.5120/ijca068216d8b6b5

@article{ 10.5120/ijca068216d8b6b5,
author = { Oluwatoyin C. Agbonifo, Gbolahan Kolawole },
title = { A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Individual Learning Style using Eye Tracking and Accelerometer },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Apr 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 96 },
month = { Apr },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 60-70 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number96/a-machine-learning-approach-for-detecting-individual-learning-style-using-eye-tracking-and-accelerometer/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca068216d8b6b5 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-04-19T00:40:22.862698+05:30
%A Oluwatoyin C. Agbonifo
%A Gbolahan Kolawole
%T A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Individual Learning Style using Eye Tracking and Accelerometer
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 96
%P 60-70
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The rapid growth and widespread adoption of e-learning platforms have transformed access to education, yet most systems still rely on one-size-fits-all instructional strategies that fail to account for individual cognitive differences. In addressing this limitation, adaptive e-learning environments increasingly depend on learner models—particularly learning styles—to personalize content delivery and instructional pathways. However, existing methods for identifying learning styles, such as self-report questionnaires and log-based LMS analytics, suffer from subjectivity, sparsity, and limited sensitivity to real-time cognitive engagement. This study develops a machine learning approach that integrates biometric sensors and behavioural data to infer learner preferences more robustly and objectively. Using a custom e-learning platform, we collected synchronized eye-tracking and mouse interaction data alongside assessment performance from undergraduate students engaging with a networking course material. An NBTree-based classification model fused these multi-source features to identify learning styles aligned with the Felder–Silverman framework. The system achieved an accuracy of 88.06% and an R² value of 0.7307, outperforming traditional questionnaire-based methods. The platform’s effectiveness was further evaluated using the four levels of the Kirkpatrick Model, demonstrating high learner satisfaction, substantial learning gains, positive behavioural transfer, and strong perceived relevance. This study contributes a validated baseline for multi-source, ML-driven learner modeling and provides an approach for dynamic, non-intrusive, near real-time personalization in adaptive e-learning systems.

References
  1. Ayoub, O., Fatima E., GAREH, A. H., & Abdellatif, E. (2025). The evolution of e-learning and its challenges in higher education: A theoretical review. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.14777792
  2. Ismail, A. M. A. (2024). Exploring the Levels of E-Learning Interactivity: A Review of Research Literature. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4693
  3. Kamal, A., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2019). Individual learning preferences based on personality traits in an E-learning scenario. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 407–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9777-4
  4. Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., Budimac, Z., & Jain, L. C. (2017). Personalization and Adaptation in E-Learning Systems. In A. Klašnja-Milićević, B. Vesin, M. Ivanović, Z. Budimac, & L. C. Jain, E-Learning Systems (Vol. 112, pp. 21–25). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41163-7_2
  5. Liyanage, M. P. P., Gunawardena, K. S. L., & Hirakawa, M. (2016). Detecting Learning Styles in Learning Management Systems Using Data Mining. Journal of Information Processing, 24(4), 740–749. https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.24.740
  6. Vaishali, S. & Dayanand, S.. (2015). Fundamentals of E-Learning Models: A Review. 2, 107–120. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349917219_Fundamentals_of_E-Learning_Models_A_Review
  7. Imran, M., Almusharraf, N., Ahmed, S., & Mansoor, M. I. (2024). Personalization of E-Learning: Future Trends, Opportunities, and Challenges. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 18(10), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i10.47053
  8. Delungahawatta, T., Dunne, S. S., Hyde, S., Halpenny, L., McGrath, D., O’Regan, A., & Dunne, C. P. (2022). Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 711. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1
  9. Valentina, A. & Nelly, A.. (2014). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29–42.
  10. Hu, K., & Raman, A. (2024). Systematic literature review on the holistic integration of e-learning in universities: Policy, human, financial, and technical perspectives. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), ep497. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14287
  11. Adewale, O. S., Agbonifo, O. C., Ibam, E. O., Makinde, A. I., Boyinbode, O. K., Ojokoh, B. A., Olabode, O. Omirin, M. S. and Olatunji, S. O. (2018). Affect-Adaptive Activities in a Personalized Ubiquitous Learning System. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(7), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.7.3
  12. Anouar, T, M., & Khaldi, M. (Eds.). (2020). Personalization and collaboration in adaptive E-learning. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1492-4
  13. Klašnja-Milićević, A., & Ivanović, M. (2021). E-learning Personalization Systems and Sustainable Education. Sustainability, 13(12), 6713. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126713
  14. Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A.-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive Learning Using Artificial Intelligence in e-Learning: A Literature Review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216
  15. El-Bakry, H. M., Saleh, A. A., Asfour, T. T. & Mastorakis, N. E. (2011). A New Adaptive E-Learning Model Based on Learner’s Styles. Mathematical Methods and Techniques in Engineering and Environmental Science 440–448. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281348400_A_New_Adaptive_E-Learning_Model_Based_on_Learner's_Styles
  16. Sweta, S., & Lal, K. (2017). Personalized Adaptive Learner Model in E-Learning System Using FCM and Fuzzy Inference System. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(4), 1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0309-y
  17. Vija, V. & Laila, N. (2012). Learner Model’s Utilization in the e-Learning Environments. 924, 162–174. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251483659_Learner_Model's_Utilization_in_the_e-Learning_Environments
  18. Premlatha, K. R., & Geetha, T. V. (2015). Learning content design and learner adaptation for adaptive e-learning environment: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 44(4), 443–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-015-9432-z
  19. Uddin, M., Ahmed, N., & Mahmood, A. (2017). A Learner Model for Adaptable e-Learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080618
  20. Sanjabi, T., & Montazer, G. A. (2020). Personalization of E-Learning Environment Using the Kolb’s Learning Style Model. 2020 6th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWR49608.2020.9122314
  21. Ngatirin, N. R., & Zainol, Z. (2021). Automatic Detection of Learning Styles: A Decade Review on Data-driven Approaches. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1997(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1997/1/012001
  22. Lamya, A., Mohamed, E., & Mohamed, K. (2021). Adaptive E-Learning and Scenarization Tools: The Case of Personalization. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 69(6), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V69I6P105
  23. Wibirama, S., Sidhawara, A. P., Lukhayu Pritalia, G., & Adji, T. B. (2020). A Survey of Learning Style Detection Method using Eye-Tracking and Machine Learning in Multimedia Learning. 2020 International Symposium on Community-Centric Systems (CcS), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CcS49175.2020.9231447
  24. Mu, S., Cui, M., & Huang, X. (2020). Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 20(23), 6856. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236856
  25. Alhasan, K., Chen, L., & Chen, F. (2018). An Experimental Study of Learning Behaviour in an E-Learning Environment. 2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 16th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 4th International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS), 1398–1403. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCC/SmartCity/DSS.2018.00231
  26. Guabassi, I. E., Bousalem, Z., Al Achhab, M., Jellouli, I., & El Mohajir, B. E. (2019). Identifying learning style through eye tracking technology in adaptive learning systems. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 9(5), 4408. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i5.pp4408-4416
  27. Ing., D. S. (2006). Mouse Movement Monitoring in learning style detection. 1–5.
  28. Bittner, D., Hauser, F., Nadimpalli, V. K., Grabinger, L., Staufer, S., & Mottok, J. (2023). Towards Eye Tracking based Learning Style Identification. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Software Engineering Education, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593663.3593680
  29. Nawaz, F., Ahmed, W., & Khushnood, M. (2022). Kirkpatrick Model and Training Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis 1982 To 2021. Business & Economic Review, 14(2), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.22547/BER/14.2.2
  30. Rasheed, F., & Wahid, A. (2021). Learning style detection in E-learning systems using machine learning techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 174, 114774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114774
  31. Graf, S., Viola, S. R., Leo, T., & Kinshuk. (2007). In-Depth Analysis of the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Dimensions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782498
  32. Zhang, Z., Li, Z., Liu, H., Cao, T., & Liu, S. (2020). Data-driven Online Learning Engagement Detection via Facial Expression and Mouse Behaviour Recognition Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119825575
  33. Spada, D., Sánchez-Montañés, M., Paredes, P., Carro, R.M. (2008). Towards Inferring Sequential-Global Dimension of Learning Styles from Mouse Movement Patterns. In: Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P., Herder, E. (eds) Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems. AH 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70987-9_48
  34. Argunsah, H., Altıntaş, L., & Şahiner, M. (2025). Eye-tracking insights into cognitive strategies, learning styles, and academic outcomes of Turkish medicine students. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06855-y
  35. Nugrahaningsih, N., Porta, M., & Klasnja-Milicevic, A. (2021). Assessing learning styles through eye tracking for e-learning applications. Computer Science and Information Systems, 18(4), 1287–1309. https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS201201035N
  36. Luo, Z., & Wang, Y. (2019). Eye-tracking technology in identifying visualizers and verbalizers: Data on eye-movement differences and detection accuracy. Data in Brief, 26, 104447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104447
  37. Tsianos, N., Germanakos, P., Lekkas, Z., Mourlas, C., & Samaras, G. (2009). Eye-Tracking Users’ Behaviour in Relation to Cognitive Style within an E-learning Environment. 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2009.110
  38. Anneli, O. (2012). The Tobii I-VT Fixation Filter: Algorithm description. 1–21.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Learning style Eye Tracking Accelerometer E-Learning Felder–Silverman Model

Powered by PhDFocusTM