CFP last date
20 January 2026
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2026

Submit your paper
Know more
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Systematic Analysis on the Reproducibility of Results in Bio-Inspired Optimization based Feature Selection Algorithm

by A. Anitha
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 69
Year of Publication: 2025
Authors: A. Anitha
10.5120/ijca2025926159

A. Anitha . A Systematic Analysis on the Reproducibility of Results in Bio-Inspired Optimization based Feature Selection Algorithm. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 69 ( Dec 2025), 43-46. DOI=10.5120/ijca2025926159

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2025926159,
author = { A. Anitha },
title = { A Systematic Analysis on the Reproducibility of Results in Bio-Inspired Optimization based Feature Selection Algorithm },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2025 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 69 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2025 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 43-46 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number69/a-systematic-analysis-on-the-reproducibility-of-results-in-bio-inspired-optimization-based-feature-selection-algorithm/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2025926159 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2025-12-24T19:35:38.334930+05:30
%A A. Anitha
%T A Systematic Analysis on the Reproducibility of Results in Bio-Inspired Optimization based Feature Selection Algorithm
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 69
%P 43-46
%D 2025
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Reproducibility is a foundation of the scientific method, signifying that when diverse researchers autonomously recreate an experiment by employing the same approaches, they should be reliable and consistently yield the same outcomes. In nature inspired optimization-based feature selection algorithms, irreproducibility may be caused by several factors including the non-convexity nature of the objective, initialization of random values, non-deterministic aspects of training like data shuffling, parallelism, random scheduling, variation in hardware, and round off quantization errors. In this study, the analysis of reproducibility of results in random search bat optimization algorithm for feature selection is conducted for Electrohysterogram (EHG) signals to assess the consistency of the algorithm. The results demonstrated that there was some variability in selected feature sets when the trial process is repeated from 1 to 20 with different bat size. Also, the method is very sensitive to initial parameters in random search process which may require further analysis to improve consistency and robustness. The study's outcomes may underscore the importance of reproducibility in feature selection research, emphasizing that it is crucial for ensuring the robustness and credibility of findings.

References
  1. Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science translational medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12.
  2. Urkullu, A., Pérez, A., & Calvo, B. (2021). Statistical model for reproducibility in ranking-based feature selection. Knowledge and Information Systems, 63(2), 379-410.
  3. Traverso, A., Wee, L., Dekker, A., & Gillies, R. (2018). Repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features: a systematic review. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 102(4), 1143-1158.
  4. Yang, X. S. (2020). Nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Academic Press.
  5. Johnvictor, A. C., Durgamahanthi, V., Pariti Venkata, R. M., & Jethi, N. (2022). Critical review of bio‐inspired optimization techniques. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 14(1), e1528.
  6. Li, J., Cheng, K., Wang, S., Morstatter, F., Trevino, R. P., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Feature selection: A data perspective. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(6), 94.
  7. Goldberger, A., Amaral, L., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J., Ivanov, P. C., Mark, R., ... & Stanley, H. E. (2000). PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: Components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation [Online]. 101 (23), pp. e215–e220.
  8. Yu, G., Yu, M., & Xu, C. (2017). Synchroextracting transform. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(10), 8042-8054.
  9. Gandomi, A. H., Yang, X. S., Alavi, A. H., &Talatahari, S. (2013). Bat algorithm for constrained optimization tasks. Neural Computing and Applications, 22, 1239-1255.
  10. Yang, X. S., & Hossein Gandomi, A. (2012). Bat algorithm: a novel approach for global engineering optimization. Engineering computations, 29(5), 464-483.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Bio-Inspired Optimization; Random Search; Reproducibility; Feature Selection; Feature Subsets