CFP last date
22 December 2025
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 22 December 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Lightweight Proof of Stake Voting Mechanism with Byzantine Agreement and Cryptographic Sortition for Telemedicine Systems

by Denis Wapukha Walumbe, Gabriel Ndung’u Kamau, Jane Wanjiru Njuki
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 60
Year of Publication: 2025
Authors: Denis Wapukha Walumbe, Gabriel Ndung’u Kamau, Jane Wanjiru Njuki
10.5120/ijca2025925932

Denis Wapukha Walumbe, Gabriel Ndung’u Kamau, Jane Wanjiru Njuki . A Lightweight Proof of Stake Voting Mechanism with Byzantine Agreement and Cryptographic Sortition for Telemedicine Systems. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 60 ( Nov 2025), 31-39. DOI=10.5120/ijca2025925932

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2025925932,
author = { Denis Wapukha Walumbe, Gabriel Ndung’u Kamau, Jane Wanjiru Njuki },
title = { A Lightweight Proof of Stake Voting Mechanism with Byzantine Agreement and Cryptographic Sortition for Telemedicine Systems },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Nov 2025 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 60 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2025 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 31-39 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number60/a-lightweight-proof-of-stake-voting-mechanism-with-byzantine-agreement-and-cryptographic-sortition-for-telemedicine-systems/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2025925932 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2025-11-29T00:49:35+05:30
%A Denis Wapukha Walumbe
%A Gabriel Ndung’u Kamau
%A Jane Wanjiru Njuki
%T A Lightweight Proof of Stake Voting Mechanism with Byzantine Agreement and Cryptographic Sortition for Telemedicine Systems
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 60
%P 31-39
%D 2025
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

With the rising integration of blockchain in critical domains such as healthcare, designing efficient, lightweight, and privacy-preserving consensus mechanisms remain a significant challenge. Existing Proof-of-Stake (PoS) implementations often incur high computational and communication overhead, making them unsuitable for telemedicine systems. This study proposed LightweightPoS, a novel voting mechanism designed for this environment. The proposed mechanism incorporates a cluster-based voting to minimize message complexity, Byzantine Agreement protocol for robust fault tolerance and cryptographic sortition to ensure fairness and privacy. This implementation slashes global communication, reducing message complexity by over 95% compared to traditional PoS models. The study evaluated the proposed and baseline mechanisms through simulations using real-time telemedicine data sensors. The results demonstrated that the proposed mechanism consistently achieved sub-10ms latency, high transaction throughput (up to 2400 TPS) and low energy consumption (~0.002kWh per round). It significantly outperformed baseline mechanism like Algorand and Ouroboros. Furthermore, the system included an effective Byzantine node detection, ensuring reliability under adversarial conditions. This work contributes a practical consensus voting mechanism that balances privacy and regulatory compliance. It provides a robust foundation for deploying blockchain technology in privacy-sensitive telemedicine applications.

References
  1. I. Abraham and D. Dolev, “Byzantine agreement with optimal early stopping, optimal resilience and polynomial complexity,” in Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2015. doi: 10.1145/2746539.2746581.
  2. S. Y. Lin, L. Zhang, J. Li, L. li Ji, and Y. Sun, “A survey of application research based on blockchain smart contract,” Wireless Networks, vol. 28, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11276-021-02874-x.
  3. S. N. Khan, F. Loukil, C. Ghedira-Guegan, E. Benkhelifa, and A. Bani-Hani, “Blockchain smart contracts: Applications, challenges, and future trends,” Peer Peer Netw Appl, vol. 14, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12083-021-01127-0.
  4. D. R. Kowalski and A. Mostéfaoui, “Synchronous byzantine agreement with nearly a cubic number of communication bits,” in Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, 2013. doi: 10.1145/2484239.2484271.
  5. C. Rupa, D. Midhunchakkaravarthy, M. K. Hasan, H. Alhumyani, and R. A. Saeed, “Industry 5.0: Ethereum blockchain technology based DApp smart contract,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.3934/MBE.2021349.
  6. Y. Wei, M. Xiao, N. Yang, and S. Leng, “Block Mining or Service Providing: A Profit Optimizing Game of the PoW-Based Miners,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010980.
  7. A. Norta, P. Dai, N. Mahi, and J. Earls, “A public, blockchain-based distributed smart-contract platform enabling mobile lite wallets using a proof-of-stake consensus algorithm,” in Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04849-5_33.
  8. V. Deval et al., “Mobile Smart Contracts: Exploring Scalability Challenges and Consensus Mechanisms,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3371901.
  9. H. H. M. Mahmoud, W. Wu, and Y. Wang, “Proof of learning: Two Novel Consensus mechanisms for data validation using Blockchain Technology in Water Distribution System,” in 2022 27th International Conference on Automation and Computing: Smart Systems and Manufacturing, ICAC 2022, 2022. doi: 10.1109/ICAC55051.2022.9911156.
  10. A. Angelucci and A. Aliverti, “Telemonitoring systems for respiratory patients: technological aspects,” Pulmonology, vol. 26, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2019.11.006.
  11. N. Lasla, L. Al-Sahan, M. Abdallah, and M. Younis, “Green-PoW: An energy-efficient blockchain Proof-of-Work consensus algorithm,” Computer Networks, vol. 214, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109118.
  12. Y. Luo, X. Deng, Y. Wu, and J. Wang, “MPC-DPOS: An efficient consensus algorithm based on secure multi-party computation,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3376044.3376061.
  13. Y. Xu, X. Yang, J. Zhang, J. Zhu, M. Sun, and B. Chen, “Proof of engagement: A flexible blockchain consensus mechanism,” Wirel Commun Mob Comput, vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/6185910.
  14. F. Yang, W. Zhou, Q. Wu, R. Long, N. N. Xiong, and M. Zhou, “Delegated proof of stake with downgrade: A secure and efficient blockchain consensus algorithm with downgrade mechanism,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935149.
  15. R. Chen, L. Wang, and R. Zhu, “Improvement of Delegated Proof of Stake Consensus Mechanism Based on Vague Set and Node Impact Factor,” Entropy, vol. 24, no. 8, 2022, doi: 10.3390/e24081013.
  16. A. H. Alamoodi, O. S. Albahri, A. A. Zaidan, H. A. Alsattar, B. B. Zaidan, and A. S. Albahri, “Hospital selection framework for remote MCD patients based on fuzzy q-rung orthopair environment,” Neural Comput Appl, vol. 35, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00521-022-07998-5.
  17. H. Qin, Y. Cheng, X. Ma, F. Li, and J. Abawajy, “Weighted Byzantine Fault Tolerance consensus algorithm for enhancing consortium blockchain efficiency and security,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 10, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.08.017.
  18. M. K. Aguilera and S. Toueg, “The correctness proof of Ben-Or’s randomized consensus algorithm,” Distrib Comput, vol. 25, no. 5, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s00446-012-0162-z.
  19. F. Koehler et al., “Impact of remote telemedical management on mortality and hospitalizations in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure: The telemedical interventional monitoring in heart failure study,” Circulation, vol. 123, no. 17, 2011, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.018473.
  20. L. E. Nohr, “Telemedicine and patients’ rights.,” J Telemed Telecare, vol. 6 Suppl 1, 2000, doi: 10.1258/1357633001934573.
  21. C. M. Fausett, M. P. Christovich, J. M. Parker, J. M. Baker, and J. R. Keebler, “Telemedicine Security: Challenges and Solutions,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 340–344, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1177/2327857921101241.
  22. F. Rezaeibagha and Y. Mu, “Practical and secure telemedicine systems for user mobility,” J Biomed Inform, vol. 78, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.12.011.
  23. T. L. Zhou, B. W. Xu, L. Shi, and Y. M. Zhou, “Measuring package cohesion based on client usages,” Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, vol. 20, no. 2, 2009, doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1001.2009.00256.
  24. R. Hao, X. Dai, and X. Xie, “Doppel: A BFT consensus algorithm for cyber-physical systems with low latency,” Journal of Systems Architecture, vol. 148, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2024.103087.
  25. M. J. Fischer, N. A. Lynch, and M. S. Paterson, “Impossibility of distributed consensus with one fault process,” 1982.
  26. C. Dwork, N. Lynch, and L. Stockmeyer, “Consensus in the presence of partial synchrony,” Journal of the ACM (JACM), vol. 35, no. 2, 1988, doi: 10.1145/42282.42283.
  27. H. Kim, J. Park, M. Bennis, and S. L. Kim, “Blockchained on-device federated learning,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 24, no. 6, 2020, doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2921755.
  28. H. J. Ko and S. S. Han, “TPS Analysis, Performance Indicator of Public Blockchain Scalability,” Journal of Information Processing Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.3745/JIPS.04.0304.
  29. H. U. Kumar and R. Prasad, “Algorand: A Better Distributed Ledger,” in 1st IEEE International Conference on Advances in Information Technology, ICAIT 2019 - Proceedings, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ICAIT47043.2019.8987305.
  30. B. David, P. Gazi, A. Kiayias, and A. Russell, “Ouroboros Praos: An Adaptively-Secure, Semi-synchronous Proof-of-Stake Blockchain,” 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78375-8_3.
  31. N. Ettaloui, S. Arezki, and T. Gadi, “An Overview of Blockchain-Based Electronic Health Record and Compliance with GDPR and HIPAA.,” 2024.
  32. A. , Arabsorkhi and E. Khazaei, “Blockchain Technology and GDPR Compliance: A Comprehensive Applicability Model.,” 2024.
  33. A. Sengupta and H. Subramanian, “User Control of Personal mHealth Data Using a Mobile Blockchain App: Design Science Perspective,” JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, vol. 10, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.2196/32104.
  34. A. J, D. P. Isravel, K. M. Sagayam, B. Bhushan, Y. Sei, and J. Eunice, “Blockchain for healthcare systems: Architecture, security challenges, trends and future directions,” 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2023.103633.
  35. A. Liu et al., “A GRA-Based Method for Evaluating Medical Service Quality,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903684.
  36. M. Ayenew et al., “Enhancing the performance of permissionless blockchain networks through randomized message-based consensus algorithm,” Peer Peer Netw Appl, vol. 16, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12083-022-01407-3.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Blockchain Consensus Proof-of-Stake telemedicine systems Byzantine agreement Cryptographic sortition