CFP last date
20 November 2026
Reseach Article

Securing Generative-AI and AIOps Systems Against Prompt Injection, Data Poisoning, and Adversarial Attacks

by Jayasanthosh Ankathi
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 149
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Jayasanthosh Ankathi
10.5120/ijcaa46e9a93b9d5

Jayasanthosh Ankathi . Securing Generative-AI and AIOps Systems Against Prompt Injection, Data Poisoning, and Adversarial Attacks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 149 ( Oct 2026), 45-51. DOI=10.5120/ijcaa46e9a93b9d5

@article{ 10.5120/ijcaa46e9a93b9d5,
author = { Jayasanthosh Ankathi },
title = { Securing Generative-AI and AIOps Systems Against Prompt Injection, Data Poisoning, and Adversarial Attacks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Oct 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 149 },
month = { Oct },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 45-51 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number149/securing-generative-ai-and-aiops-systems-against-prompt-injection-data-poisoning-and-adversarial-attacks/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijcaa46e9a93b9d5 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-10-24T03:08:53.896184+05:30
%A Jayasanthosh Ankathi
%T Securing Generative-AI and AIOps Systems Against Prompt Injection, Data Poisoning, and Adversarial Attacks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 149
%P 45-51
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Generative AI and AIOps are increasingly embedded in enterprise observability, automated remediation, service management and the software supply chain, which widens the attack surface from prompts to training data and model updates. This work proposes and evaluates a multi layered defense against prompt injection, data poisoning, adversarial input manipulation and supply chain tampering. A controlled dataset of 172 attack instances was constructed, with an equal number of instances for each threat class. Every instance was run against an unsecured baseline, an input gateway configuration and a full defense configuration that combines data screening, provenance checks, adversarial validation, policy enforcement, continuous monitoring and incident response. The experimental workflow was implemented in Python using a structured security test harness, with Matplotlib for visual analysis and logging utilities for reproducible evidence capture. The results show that although isolated controls can stop attacks that are clearly malicious, vulnerabilities remain at cross layer points and are exposed when attacks exploit trusted context, polluted training material or operational automation. The layered approach further reduces the likelihood of successful attacks and preserves useful model behavior while improving the ability to detect, contain and recover from an attack. The paper therefore recommends a practical security pattern for organizations deploying generative AI and AIOps components in production environments, where governance, auditability and controlled automation must work together rather than as standalone security considerations.

References
  1. B. Biggio and F. Roli, “Wild patterns: Ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 84, pp. 317–331, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.07.023
  2. N. Akhtar and A. Mian, “Threat of adversarial attacks on deep learning in computer vision: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 14410–14430, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2807385
  3. X. Yuan, P. He, Q. Zhu, and X. Li, “Adversarial examples: Attacks and defenses for deep learning,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2805–2824, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2886017
  4. H. Kwon and W. Pak, “Text based prompt injection attack using mathematical functions in modern large language models,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 24, art. 5008, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13245008
  5. Y. Yao, J. Duan, K. Xu, Y. Cai, Z. Sun, and Y. Zhang, “A survey on large language model (LLM) security and privacy: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly,” High Confidence Computing, vol. 4, no. 2, art. 100211, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcc.2024.100211
  6. Z. Wang, J. Ma, X. Wang, J. Hu, Z. Qin, and K. Ren, “Threats to training: A survey of poisoning attacks and defenses on machine learning systems,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 7, art. 134, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1145/3538707
  7. F. A. Yerlikaya and Ş. Bahtiyar, “Data poisoning attacks against machine learning algorithms,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 208, art. 118101, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118101
  8. H. Xu, Y. Ma, H. C. Liu, D. Deb, H. Liu, J. L. Tang, and A. K. Jain, “Adversarial attacks and defenses in images, graphs and text: A review,” International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 17, pp. 151–178, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633 019 1211 x
  9. A. Chakraborty, M. Alam, V. Dey, A. Chattopadhyay, and D. Mukhopadhyay, “A survey on adversarial attacks and defences,” CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–45, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1049/cit2.12028
  10. I. Rosenberg, A. Shabtai, Y. Elovici, and L. Rokach, “Adversarial machine learning attacks and defense methods in the cyber security domain,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 5, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453158
  11. Y. Chen, M. Cui, D. Wang, Y. Cao, P. Yang, B. Jiang, Z. Lu, and B. Liu, “A survey of large language models for cyber threat detection,” Computers & Security, vol. 145, art. 104016, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.104016
  12. W. Zhou, X. Zhu, Q. L. Han, L. Li, X. Chen, S. Wen, and Y. Xiang, “The security of using large language models: A survey with emphasis on ChatGPT,” IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2024.124983
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Prompt injection data poisoning adversarial attacks generative AI AIOps