CFP last date
21 September 2026
Reseach Article

A Multi-Task Stacked Ensemble and IoT-Enabled Decision Support System for Precision Fertigation in Smallholder Agriculture

by Awojide S., Ikpotokin F.O., Sadiq F.I.
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 144
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Awojide S., Ikpotokin F.O., Sadiq F.I.
10.5120/ijca9a6e56b81235

Awojide S., Ikpotokin F.O., Sadiq F.I. . A Multi-Task Stacked Ensemble and IoT-Enabled Decision Support System for Precision Fertigation in Smallholder Agriculture. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 144 ( Sep 2026), 36-42. DOI=10.5120/ijca9a6e56b81235

@article{ 10.5120/ijca9a6e56b81235,
author = { Awojide S., Ikpotokin F.O., Sadiq F.I. },
title = { A Multi-Task Stacked Ensemble and IoT-Enabled Decision Support System for Precision Fertigation in Smallholder Agriculture },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Sep 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 144 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 36-42 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number144/a-multi-task-stacked-ensemble-and-iot-enabled-decision-support-system-for-precision-fertigation-in-smallholder-agriculture/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca9a6e56b81235 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-09-19T02:57:40.855972+05:30
%A Awojide S.
%A Ikpotokin F.O.
%A Sadiq F.I.
%T A Multi-Task Stacked Ensemble and IoT-Enabled Decision Support System for Precision Fertigation in Smallholder Agriculture
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 144
%P 36-42
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Nigerian agriculture's fixed-schedule fertigation causes low efficiency and nutrient leaching. A stacked‑ensemble model is developed for precision fertigation that jointly predicts fertigation need, rate (kg/ha) and timing (Early/Optimal/Late). To train and evaluate the ensemble, a unified dataset was integrated, comprising 12,840 records and 42 variables from a Nigerian soil–weather–yield dataset, a locally sourced Nigerian IoT sensor series and historical weather/NDVI feeds. An LSTM soil‑dynamics model, an XGBoost rate regressor and Random Forest need/timing classifiers are fused through an XGBoost meta‑learner trained on out‑of‑fold predictions. On held‑out partitions, the ensemble reduced rate MAE from 0.55 to 0.49 kg/ha (−10.9%) and RMSE from 0.68 to 0.61 kg/ha (−10.3%; R² 0.88→0.92), raised need F1 from 0.83 to 0.86 (accuracy 0.87→0.89; AUC 0.89→0.93) and timing macro‑F1 from 0.84 to 0.86, with well‑calibrated probabilities (Brier 0.082). The trained ensemble was deployed through a RESTful API and responsive dashboard; under concurrent load, the system recorded 0% request errors with 1.88s median API latency, demonstrating practical deployability for Nigerian smallholder agriculture.

References
  1. Matthew, M. D., Timothy, E., & Olorunshola, E. O. (2025). Adaptation strategies to climate variability among maize farmers in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 29(3), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v29i3.11
  2. Bamigboye, F. O., & Ademola, E. O. (2019). Internet of Things: The present status, future impacts and challenges in Nigerian agriculture. In J. A. Lozano, R. J. Howlett, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Internet of things: Information processing in an increasingly connected world (pp. 211–217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-15651-0_17
  3. Wu, M., Xiong, J., Li, R., Dong, A., Lv, C., Sun, D., Abdelghany, A. E., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., & Niu, W. (2023). Predicting fertiliser concentration for precision irrigation under mixed variable-rate fertigation using machine learning: A case study of combined fertilisation with dipotassium hydrogen phosphate and potassium chloride. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2996273/v1
  4. Masud Cheema, M. J., Iqbal, T., Daccache, A., Hussain, S., & Awais, M. (2023). Precision agriculture technologies. In Precision agriculture (pp. 231250). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B97 8-0-443- 18953-1.00011-8
  5. Li, Z., Zhou, X., Cheng, Q., Fei, S., & Chen, Z. (2023). A machine-learning model based on the fusion of spectral and textural features from UAV multi-sensors to analyze the total nitrogencontent in winter wheat. Remote Sensing, 15(8), 2152. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082152
  6. Idris, F., Abdul Latiff, A., Buntat, M. A., Lecthmanan, Y., & Berahim, Z. (2024). IoT- based fertigation system for agriculture. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 13(3), 1574–1581. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i3.6829
  7. Oguntoye, J. P., Olayiwola, A. A., Ogunkola, T. G., Fanibuyan, J. O., Ganiyu, R. A., & Olayiwola, D. S. (2024). Real-time IoT-based smart fertigation system for sustainable and precision agriculture. The Journal of Computer Science and Its Applications, 31(2).
  8. Nyakuri, J., Bizimana, J., Bigirabagabo, A., Gafirita, J., Munyaneza, M., & Nzemerimana, J. (2022). IoT and AI based smart soil quality assessment for data- driven irrigation and fertilisation. American Journal of Computing and Engineering, 5(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.1232
  9. Adamo, T., Caivano, D., Colizzi, L., Dimauro, G., Guerriero, E., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Optimisation of irrigation and fertigation in smart agriculture: An IoT-based micro-services framework. Smart Agricultural Technology, 11, Article 100885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100885
  10. Biase, A. G., Albertini, T. Z., & de Mello, R. F. (2022). On supervised learning to model and predict cattle weight in precision livestock breeding. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 195, Article 106706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106706
  11. Hudaya, R., Margana, D. B., Hartono, R. W. T., & Magribi, A. N. (2020). Fertigation management system model using supervised machine learning and time-duration method on agricultural industrial land. In Proceedings of the International Seminar of Science and Applied Technology (ISSAT 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.201221.007
  12. Zhang, Q. (2023). Opinion paper: Precision agriculture, smart agriculture, or digital agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 211, Article 107982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2 023.107982
  13. Wu, M., Xiong, J., Li, R., Dong, A., Lv, C., Sun, D., Abdelghany, A. E., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Siddique, K. H. M., & Niu, W. (2024). Precision forecasting of fertiliser components’ concentratio s in mixed variable-rate fertigation through machine learning.
  14. Mish, A. (n.d.). Crop yield data with soil and weather dataset [Data set]. Kaggle. Retrieved fromhttps://www.kaggle.com/datasets/anshumish/crop- yield-data-with-soil-and-weather-dataset
  15. Diarah, R. S., Osueke, C., Aderemi, A., George, I., & Emeng, E. (2026). Dataset on real-time IoT-based fertigation, irrigation, and hydroponics smart agriculture system for precision farming applications using STM32F401RE microcontroller architecture (Version 1) [Data set]. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/96nj4yyzkg.1
  16. OpenWeather Ltd. (2024). OpenWeather Current Weather and 5-Day Forecast API. Retrieved from https://openweathermap.org/api
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Precision fertigation; machine learning; stacked ensemble; time-series models; tree-based algorithms; Internet of Things; decision support system; smallholder agriculture; Nigeria