CFP last date
20 August 2026
Reseach Article

AI‑Monitored GIS and IoT in the Sugar Industry: Systematic Literature Review

by Amol Chavan, Santosh Parakh
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 126
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Amol Chavan, Santosh Parakh
10.5120/ijcac7dee3b0cef6

Amol Chavan, Santosh Parakh . AI‑Monitored GIS and IoT in the Sugar Industry: Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 126 ( Jul 2026), 53-59. DOI=10.5120/ijcac7dee3b0cef6

@article{ 10.5120/ijcac7dee3b0cef6,
author = { Amol Chavan, Santosh Parakh },
title = { AI‑Monitored GIS and IoT in the Sugar Industry: Systematic Literature Review },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jul 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 126 },
month = { Jul },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 53-59 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number126/aimonitored-gis-and-iot-in-the-sugar-industry-systematic-literature-review/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijcac7dee3b0cef6 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-07-29T00:34:19.117012+05:30
%A Amol Chavan
%A Santosh Parakh
%T AI‑Monitored GIS and IoT in the Sugar Industry: Systematic Literature Review
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 126
%P 53-59
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

AI‑enabled GIS, remote sensing, and IoT are reshaping sugarcane‑based systems by enabling precise yield prediction, real‑time stress monitoring, and process optimization. This systematic review (2016–2026) synthesizes 20 studies on AI, IoT, GIS/remote sensing and Industry 4.0 within sugarcane cultivation and sugar manufacturing. Remote‑sensing and ML approaches (Sentinel‑1/2, Landsat‑8, UAV‑LiDAR, multi‑sensor fusion) achieve high sugarcane yield/biomass prediction accuracy (R² up to 0.97, RMSE reductions up to 59%), providing decision support for planting density, irrigation and management [1-6]. IoT‑based smart irrigation on saline soils increases sugarcane growth and reduces water use and cultivation cost [7]. AI‑IoT smart‑factory and Industry 4.0 case studies show impressive cost reductions, planning time savings and resource‑use optimization, though not sugar‑specific [8-12]. A dedicated concept paper proposes productivity impact analysis from AI‑monitored GIS and IoT in 20 Maharashtra sugar factories with explicit productivity/resource‑optimization hypotheses but no empirical results yet [13]. A bibliometric study on AI in sugar production confirms rapid growth of AI‑based sensor and systems management aimed at efficiency and sustainability across the supply chain [14]. Evidence converges on strong potential productivity and sustainability gains, but there is a clear lack of end‑to‑end, quantified studies linking field‑level AI‑GIS‑IoT data to mill‑level KPIs (recovery %, throughput, energy use). Key research gaps concern integrated value‑chain productivity metrics, factory‑level AIoT deployment in sugar, sensor fusion for nutrients and stress, and longitudinal impact and adoption studies.

References
  1. Canata TF, Wei M, Maldaner LF, Molin J. Sugarcane Yield Mapping Using High-Resolution Imagery Data and Machine Learning Technique. Remote. Sens.. 2021;13:232. doi:10.3390/rs13020232
  2. Xu J, J, Tang Y, et al. Estimation of Sugarcane Yield Using a Machine Learning Approach Based on UAV-LiDAR Data. Remote. Sens.. 2020;12:2823. doi:10.3390/rs12172823
  3. Das A, Kumar M, Kushwaha A, et al. Machine learning model ensemble for predicting sugarcane yield through synergy of optical and SAR remote sensing. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.100962
  4. Rahman M, Robson A. Integrating Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 Time Series Data for Yield Prediction of Sugarcane Crops at the Block Level. Remote. Sens.. 2020;12:1313. doi:10.3390/rs12081313
  5. Rosa J. Integrating remote sensing and crop modeling for enhanced sugarcane yield predictions in the main production region of Brazil. 2024. doi: 10.11606/t.11.2024.tde-12032025-154152
  6. Servia H, Pareeth S, Michailovsky C, Fraiture C, Karimi P. Operational framework to predict field level crop biomass using remote sensing and data driven models. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation. 2022; 108:102725. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2022.102725
  7. Gopikrishnan S, Srivastava G, Priakanth P. Improving sugarcane production in saline soils with Machine Learning and the Internet of Things. Sustain. Comput. Informatics Syst.. 2022;35:100743. doi:10.1016/j.suscom.2022.100743
  8. Soori M, Arezoo B, Dastres R. Internet of things for smart factories in industry 4.0, a review. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.006
  9. Fatima Z, Tanveer M, Waseemullah W, et al. Production Plant and Warehouse Automation with IoT and Industry 5.0. Applied Sciences. 2022. doi:10.3390/app12042053
  10. Belli L, Davoli L, Medioli A, Marchini PL, Ferrari G. Toward Industry 4.0 With IoT: Optimizing Business Processes in an Evolving Manufacturing Factory. Frontiers ICT. 2019;6:17. doi:10.3389/fict.2019.00017
  11. Bunian S, Al-Ebrahim MA, Nour AA. Role and Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Manufacturing Engineering: A Review. Engineered Science. 2024. doi:10.30919/es1088
  12. Zheng T, Ardolino M, Bacchetti A, Perona M. The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research. 2020;59:1922 - 1954. doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1824085
  13. Chavan A, Kazi M, Parakh S. Productivity Impact Analysis from Artificial Intelligence Monitored GIS and IoT Data of Sugar Industries. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2025. doi:10.5120/ijca2025925751
  14. Hernández-Palma H, Alvarado JRP, Guiliany JEG, Rios ALM. Technological Tools Based on Artificial Intelligence in the Sugar Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Perspectives for Energy Efficiency. LADEE. 2023. doi:10.17981/ladee.04.02.2023.4
  15. Amarasingam N, Salgadoe S, Powell K, Gonzalez LF, Natarajan S. A review of UAV platforms, sensors, and applications for monitoring of sugarcane crops. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100712
  16. V, Prasad P, Avinash G, et al. Harnessing AI and Remote sensing for precision sugarcane farming: tackling water stress, salinity, and nitrogen challenges. Frontiers in Agronomy. 2025. doi:10.3389/fagro.2025.1681294
  17. Som-Ard J, Atzberger C, Izquierdo-Verdiguier E, Vuolo F, Immitzer M. Remote Sensing Applications in Sugarcane Cultivation: A Review. Remote. Sens.. 2021;13:4040. doi:10.3390/rs13204040
  18. Chavan A, Kazi M, Parakh S. AI tools and Technologies for Productivity Enhancement in Sugar Industry. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2025. doi:10.5120/ijca2025925750
  19. Miller T, Mikiciuk G, Durlik I, Mikiciuk M, Łobodzińska A, Śnieg M. The IoT and AI in Agriculture: The Time Is Now—A Systematic Review of Smart Sensing Technologies. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2025;25. doi:10.3390/s25123583
  20. Ilyas QM, Ahmad M, Mehmood A. Automated Estimation of Crop Yield Using Artificial Intelligence and Remote Sensing Technologies. Bioengineering. 2023;10. doi:10.3390/bioengineering10020125
  21. Awais M, Wang X, Hussain S, Aziz F, Mahmood M. Advancing Precision Agriculture Through Digital Twins and Smart Farming Technologies: A Review. AgriEngineering. 2025. doi:10.3390/agriengineering7050137
  22. Guebsi R, Mami S, Chokmani K. Drones in Precision Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Applications, Technologies, and Challenges. Drones. 2024. doi:10.3390/drones8110686
  23. Mohammed S, Deepika J, Sritharan N, Ravichandran V, Prasanthrajan M, Kannan P. A systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in transforming precision agriculture for sustainable farming: Current status and future directions. Plant Science Today. 2025. doi:10.14719/pst.6175
  24. Araújo S, Peres RS, Ramalho JC, Lidon F, Barata J. Machine Learning Applications in Agriculture: Current Trends, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Agronomy. 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13122976
  25. Senoo EEK, Anggraini L, Kumi JA, et al. IoT Solutions with Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Precision Agriculture: Definitions, Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities. Electronics. 2024. doi:10.3390/electronics13101894
  26. Paul-Chima UO, Ogenyi FC, Alum E, et al. Implementing artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms for optimized crop management: a systematic review on data-driven approach to enhancing resource use and agricultural sustainability. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2025;11. doi:10.1080/23311932.2025.2569982
  27. Abdelmoneim AA, Kimaita HN, Kalaany CAM, Derardja B, Dragonetti G, Khadra R. IoT Sensing for Advanced Irrigation Management: A Systematic Review of Trends, Challenges, and Future Prospects. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2025;25. doi:10.3390/s25072291
  28. Nsoh B, Katimbo A, Guo H, et al. Internet of Things-Based Automated Solutions Utilizing Machine Learning for Smart and Real-Time Irrigation Management: A Review. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2024;24. doi:10.3390/s24237480
  29. Istiak MA, Syeed MM, Hossain MS, et al. Adoption of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery in agricultural management: A systematic literature review. Ecol. Informatics. 2023;78:102305. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102305
  30. Jabed MA, Murad MAA. Crop yield prediction in agriculture: A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning approaches, with insights for future research and sustainability. Heliyon. 2024;10. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40836
  31. Agrawal K, Goktas P, Holtkemper M, Beecks C, Kumar N. AI-driven transformation in food manufacturing: a pathway to sustainable efficiency and quality assurance. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2025;12. doi:10.3389/fnut.2025.1553942
  32. Da Silveira F, Da Silva SLC, Machado FM, Barbedo J, Amaral FG. Farmers' perception of barriers that difficult the implementation of agriculture 4.0. Agricultural Systems. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103656
  33. Sharma A, Jain A, Gupta P, Chowdary V. Machine Learning Applications for Precision Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Access. 2021;9:4843-4873. doi:10.1109/access.2020.3048415
  34. Varriale V, Cammarano A, Michelino F, Caputo M. Critical analysis of the impact of artificial intelligence integration with cutting-edge technologies for production systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2023;36:61 - 93. doi:10.1007/s10845-023-02244-8
  35. Matin A, Islam MR, Wang X, Huo H, Xu G. AIoT for sustainable manufacturing: Overview, challenges, and opportunities. Internet Things. 2023;24:100901. doi:10.1016/j.iot.2023.100901.
  36. Wang J, Wang Y, Li G, Qi Z. Integration of Remote Sensing and Machine Learning for Precision Agriculture: A Comprehensive Perspective on Applications. Agronomy. 2024. doi:10.3390/agronomy14091975
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

AI Sugar production GIS Sugarcane Productivity Enhancement IoT Industry 4.0