CFP last date
22 June 2026
Reseach Article

Fruit Image Classification using Optimal Features Extracted by Soft-Computing Techniques

by Harmandeep Singh Gill
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 103
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Harmandeep Singh Gill
10.5120/ijca63a9c28e2a15

Harmandeep Singh Gill . Fruit Image Classification using Optimal Features Extracted by Soft-Computing Techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 103 ( May 2026), 15-25. DOI=10.5120/ijca63a9c28e2a15

@article{ 10.5120/ijca63a9c28e2a15,
author = { Harmandeep Singh Gill },
title = { Fruit Image Classification using Optimal Features Extracted by Soft-Computing Techniques },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 103 },
month = { May },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 15-25 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number103/fruit-image-classification-using-optimal-features-extracted-by-soft-computing-techniques/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca63a9c28e2a15 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-05-17T02:29:11.138384+05:30
%A Harmandeep Singh Gill
%T Fruit Image Classification using Optimal Features Extracted by Soft-Computing Techniques
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 103
%P 15-25
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Fruit classification is found to be one of the emerging area in computer vision. The accuracy of the classification system depends on the quality of acquired images, number of features, types of features, selection of features from extracted features and type of classifier used. Images taken in poor environment conditions decrease the visibility and hidden information of digital images. Therefore, image enhancement techniques are necessary for improving the significant details of these images. This study provides a review to highlight recent progress of image enhancement techniques for improving the visibility of fruit images. In this paper, a new fuzzy type-II based image enhancement technique is designed to improve the quality of visibly weather degraded fruit images. The type-II fuzzy logic can automatically extract the local atmospheric light and roughly eliminate the atmospheric veil in local detail enhancement. Thereafter, Teacher-learning based optimization (TLBO) algorithm is used to find an optimal combination of threshold values at different levels for minimizing the cross entropy. TLBO algorithm is inspired by passing on knowledge within a classroom environment where students _rst gain knowledge from a teacher and then through mutual interaction. From experimental results, it is observed that this method is an efficient and feasible method to search an optimal combination of threshold values. Afterwards, fruit images will be classified using Convolution neural network (CNN) and Recurrent neural network (RNN). CNN is utilized to develop discriminative characteristics and RNN is utilized to develop sequential labels. Extensive experiments have been carried out by considering the proposed techniques (i.e., CNN, RNN without type-II fuzzy logic and CNNRNN with type-II fuzzy logic) and existing competitive techniques on fruit images. It is observed that the proposed technique outperforms existing image classification techniques in terms of accuracy and coefficient of correlation. Another contribution of this study is proposal of new image classification technique for weather degraded fruit images. The proposed method is tested on number of fruit images and observed that proposed technique outperforms existing image classification techniques in terms of accuracy. Results of the study are quite promising and justify significance of proposed research.

References
  1. Singh, S. P. et.al, 2015. www.ijstm.com. vol.4, no.1, pp.1599-1605.
  2. Philips, R. D., et.al, 2014. An SMP Soft classification algorithm for remote sensing. Computers & Geosciences. vol. 68, pp.73-80.
  3. Lin, H. et.al, 2008. Machine Recognition for Broad-Leaved Trees Based on Synthetic Features of Leaves Using Probabilistic Neural Network. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, 12-14 Dec. Wuhan, Hubei, China, pp.871-887.
  4. Giotis, I. et.al, 2014. Cluster-based adaptive metric classification. Neurocomputing. vol.81, pp.33-40.
  5. Damodaran, B. B. et.al, 2014. Assessment of the impact of dimensionality reduction methods on information classes and classifiers for hyper-spectral image classification by multiple classifier system. Advances in Space Research. vol.53, no.12, pp.1720-1734.
  6. Vijila, A. J. et.al, 2010. Performance Improved GA Based Statistical Computing Technique for Retinal Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Students Technology symposium, IIT Kharagpur. 3-4 April 2010, pp.107-109.
  7. Guijarro, M. and Pajares, G. 2009. On combining classifiers through a fuzzy multicriteria decision making approach: Applied to natural textual images. Expert systems with Applications. vol.36, no.3, pp.7262-7269.
  8. Agarwal, K. et.al, 2011. Process Knowledge based multi-class support vector classification(PK-SVM) approach for surface defects in hot rolling. Expert systems with Applications. vol.38, no.6, pp.7251-7262.
  9. Liao, T.W. et.al, 2000. Extraction of welds from radiographic images using fuzzy classifiers. Information Sciences. vol.126, no.1-4, pp.21-40.
  10. Guerbai, Y. et.al, 2015. The effective use of the one-class SVM classifier for handwritten signature verification based on writer-independent parameters. Pattern Recognition. vol.48, no.1, pp.103-113.
  11. Zhang, K. et.al, 2014. A hybrid approach combining extreme learning machine and sparse representation for image classification. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. vol.27, pp.228-235.
  12. Kumar, P. P. et.al, 2011. Fuzzy-rough discriminative feature selection and classification algorithm, with application to microarray and image datasets. Applied Soft Computing. vol.11, no.4, pp.3429-3440.
  13. Banerji, S. et.al, 2013. New image descriptors based on color, texture, shape, and wavelets for object and scene image classification. Neurocomputing. vol.117, pp.173-185.
  14. Long, D. and Singh.V .P. 2013. An Entropy-Based Multispectral Image Classification Algorithm. IEEE trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. vol.51, no.12, pp.5225-5238.
  15. Evsukoff, A. G. et.al, 2009. Design of interpretable fuzzy rule-based classifiers using spectral analysis with structure and parameters optimization. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. vol.160, no.7, pp.857-881.
  16. Mei, K. et.al, 2014. A distributed approach for large-scale classifier training and image classification. Neurocomputing. vol.144, pp.304-317.
  17. M. A. T. et.al, 2001. Image classification for Content-Based Indexing. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. vol.10, no.1, pp.117-130.
  18. Mala, k. Sadasivam, V. and Alagappan, S. 2015. Neural Network based texture analysis of CT imges for fatty cirrohosis liver classification. Applied Soft Computing. vol.32, pp-80-85.
  19. Dong, P. et.al, 2013. Training inter-related classifiers for automatic classification and annotation. Pattern Recognition. vol.46, pp.1382-1395.
  20. Hasanlou, M. et.al, 2012. Comparative Study of intrinsic dimensionality Estimation and Dimension Reduction Techniques on Hyperspectral Images using K-NN Classifier. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letter. vol.9, no.6, pp-.046-1050.
  21. Nauck, D. and Kruse, R., 1997. A neuro-fuzzy method to learn fuzzy classification rules from data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. vol.89, no.3, pp.277-288.
  22. Peng, J. X. et.al, 2012. A Sequential algorithm for sparse support vector classifiers. Pattern Recognition. vol.46, no.4, pp.1195-1208.
  23. Guan, S. et.al, 2005. A class decomposition approach for GA-based classifiers. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. vol.18, no.3, pp.271-278.
  24. Farid, D. M. et.al, 2014. Hybrid decision tree and naïve Bayes classifiers for multi-class classification tasks. Expert systems with Applications. vol.41, no.4, pp.937-1946.
  25. Singh, S. and Singh, M. 2005. A dynamic classifier selection and combination approach to image region labeling. Signal Processing: Image Communication. vol.20, no.3, pp.219-231.
  26. Giacinto, G. and Roli, F. 2001. Design of effective network ensembles for image classification purposes. Image and Vision Computing. vol.19, no.9, pp.699-707.
  27. Lu, Y. and Tian, Q. 2009. Discriminant subspace analysis: An Adaptive approach for Image Classification. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. vol.11, no.7, pp.1289-1300.
  28. Wilk, T. and Wozniak, M., 2012. Soft computing methods applied to combination of one-class Classifiers. Neurocomputing. vol.75, no.1, pp.185-193.
  29. Hemanth, D. J. et.al, 2014. Performance Improved Iteration-Free Artificial Neural Networks for Abnormal Magnetic Resonance Brain Image Classification. Neurocomputing. vol.130, pp.98-107.
  30. Lashari, S. A. and Ibrahim, R. 2013. A Framework for Medical Images Classification using Soft Set. The 4th International conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI 2013). Procedia Technology. vol.11, pp.548-556.
  31. Mitrakis, N. E. et.al, 2008. Decision Fusion of GA self-organizing Neuro-Fuzzy Multilayered classifiers for Land cover classification using textural and spectral Features. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. vol.46, no.7, pp.2137-2152.
  32. Connolly, J. F. et.al, 2013. Dynamic multi-objective evolution of classifier ensembles for video face recognition. Applied Soft Computing vol.13, no.6, pp.3149-3166.
  33. Jiji, G. W. and DuraiRaj, P. J. 2015. Content-based image retrieval techniques for the analysis of dermatological lesions using particle swarm optimization technique. Applied soft Computing. vol.30, pp.650-662.
  34. Guironnet, M. et.al, 2007. A fusion architecture based on TBM for camera motion classification. Image and Vision Computing. vol.25, no.11, pp.1737-747.
  35. Fauvel, M. et.al, 2008. Spectral and Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral data using SVMs and Morphological Profiles. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. vol.46, no.11, pp.3804-3814.
  36. Ghosh, A. et.al, 2009. A novel approach to neuro-fuzzy classification. Neural Networks. vol.22, no.1, pp.100-109.
  37. Xiao, K. et.al, 2013. Extraction and application of deformation-based feature in medical images. Neurocomputing. vol. 120, pp.177-184.
  38. Damodaran, B. B. et.al, 2013. Assessment of the impact of dimensionality reduction methods on information classes and classifiers for hyperspectral image classification by multiple classifier system. Advances in Space Research vol.53, no.12, pp.1720-1734.
  39. Giorgio, G. et.al, 2001. Design of effective Neural Network ensembles for image classification purposes. Image and Vision Computing. vol.19, no.9, pp.699-707.
  40. Atkinson, P. M. and Curran, P.J. 1995. Designing an optimal size of support for Remote Sensing Investigations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. vol.33, no.3, pp.768-776.
  41. Lee, J. S. et.al, 2009. Unsupervised classification of polarimetric SAR images by applying target decomposition and complex wishart distribution. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Remote Sensing. vol. 37, pp.2249–2258.
  42. Wei, L. et.al, 2005. A study of several machine- learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications. IEEE transactions on Medical Imaging. vol. 24, no.3, pp.371-380.
  43. C. Li, Y. Yang, L. Xiao, Y. Li, Y. Zhou, and J. Zhao, “A novel image enhancement method using fuzzy sure entropy,” Neurocomputing, vol. 215, pp. 196– 211, 2016.
  44. Gill, Harmandeep Singh, and Baljit Singh Khehra. "Hybrid classifier model for fruit classification." Multimedia Tools and Applications (2021): 1-36.
  45. Gill, Harmandeep Singh, and Baljit Singh Khehra. "Efficient image classification technique for weather degraded fruit images." IET Image Processing 14.14 (2020): 3463-3470.
  46. Gill, Harmandeep Singh, and Baljit Singh Khehra. "An integrated approach using CNN-RNN-LSTM for classification of fruit images." Materials Today: Proceedings (2021).
  47. Gill, Harmandeep Singh, and Baljit Singh Khehra. "Minimum cross entropy thresholding based apple image segmentation using teacher learner based optimization algorithm." 2021 International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (ICECCE). IEEE, 2021.
  48. Gill, Harmandeep Singh, and Baljit Singh Khehra. "Apple image segmentation using teacher learner based optimization based minimum cross entropy thresholding." Multimedia Tools and Applications 81.8 (2022): 11005-11026.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

CNN RNN LSTM Deep Learning