CFP last date
22 June 2026
Reseach Article

Predictive Modelling Accuracy Analytics for Harvest Forecast and Agricultural Sustainability

by M. Fatima, Vineet Gupta, Vinita Jain, Neha Sharma, Suti Raj, Ruchi Gupta
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 101
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: M. Fatima, Vineet Gupta, Vinita Jain, Neha Sharma, Suti Raj, Ruchi Gupta
10.5120/ijca29c29d078aac

M. Fatima, Vineet Gupta, Vinita Jain, Neha Sharma, Suti Raj, Ruchi Gupta . Predictive Modelling Accuracy Analytics for Harvest Forecast and Agricultural Sustainability. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 101 ( May 2026), 17-23. DOI=10.5120/ijca29c29d078aac

@article{ 10.5120/ijca29c29d078aac,
author = { M. Fatima, Vineet Gupta, Vinita Jain, Neha Sharma, Suti Raj, Ruchi Gupta },
title = { Predictive Modelling Accuracy Analytics for Harvest Forecast and Agricultural Sustainability },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 101 },
month = { May },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 17-23 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number101/predictive-modelling-accuracy-analytics-for-harvest-forecast-and-agricultural-sustainability/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca29c29d078aac },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-05-17T02:28:57.201709+05:30
%A M. Fatima
%A Vineet Gupta
%A Vinita Jain
%A Neha Sharma
%A Suti Raj
%A Ruchi Gupta
%T Predictive Modelling Accuracy Analytics for Harvest Forecast and Agricultural Sustainability
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 101
%P 17-23
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Harvest Forecast and estimation is important for food security and efficient resource management. It helps policymakers make decisions about agriculture. This paper employed two machine learning techniques, Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), to assess the capacity for Harvest (Crop Yield) Forecast. The dataset consisted of 19,689 records gathered from various regions of India between 1997 and 2018 on 17 distinct crops. The dataset included both categorical and numerical data such as harvest type, season, and state as well as quantitative measures like cultivated area, production levels, rainfall, fertilizer use and pesticide use. The dataset was divided into two parts: training and testing, with an 80:20 ratio. A 5-fold cross-validation method was used during model training to make sure that the results were accurate. We used three common metrices to measure efficacy of model: coefficient of determination (R²), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The paper demonstrated that the Random Forest model is better than the SVM model when it comes to make accurate predictions and reducing errors. The results also show that the Random Forest model does a better job for harvest forecast than earlier studies. It got a R² value of 0.97, which is higher than the usual range of 0.88 to 0.96 for tree-based models that are similar. This demonstrated that how well it can find complex patterns in agricultural datasets.

References
  1. M. Chlingaryan, J. Sukkarieh, and B. Whelan, “Machine learning approaches for harvestprediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: A review,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 151, pp. 61–69, 2018.
  2. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995.
  3. L. Breiman, “Random forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001.
  4. A. Kamilaris and F. X. Prenafeta-Boldú, “Deep learning in agriculture: A survey,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 147, pp. 70–90, 2018.
  5. D. Montesinos-López, A. Montesinos-López, J. Crossa, and O. Franco, “A review of deep learning applications for crop improvement,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 10, p. 1197, 2019.
  6. T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 785–794.
  7. R. Kohavi, “A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 1995, pp. 1137–1145.
  8. F. Chollet, Deep Learning with Python, 2nd ed. Shelter Island, NY, USA: Manning Publications, 2021.
  9. M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, “Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 1135–1144.
  10. S. Sharma, P. Gupta, and A. Verma, “Crop prediction using machine learning algorithms,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–5, 2021.
  11. R. Kumar and S. Singh, “Prediction of Crop machine learning algorithms: A review,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 32–40, 2022.
  12. J. Patel and M. Shah, “A survey on predicting crop yield based on machine learning techniques,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 162, no. 11, pp. 23–27, 2019.
  13. Y. Li, J. Li, and S. Wang, “Crop yield prediction with deep neural networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Engineering (iCMLDE), Sydney, Australia, 2020, pp. 35–40.
  14. S. Nandhini, R. Ramya, and V. Rajesh, “Prediction of agricultural crop using machine learning algorithms,” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 452–459, 2020.
  15. B. Mishra and R. Mishra, “An efficient model for crop prediction using XGBoost and random forest algorithm,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 45, pp. 5955–5961, 2021.
  16. A. Jain, V. Kumar, and R. Pathak, “A comparative study of machine learning techniques for crop yield prediction,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 498–503, 2019.
  17. S. Kalpana and D. K. Chithra, “Agricultural crop prediction using artificial neural network and support vector machine,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 24–28, 2019.
  18. K. S. Natarajan and R. Sowmya, “Ensemble learning techniques for crop prediction: A comparative study,” International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 123–128, 2020.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Harvest forecast Random Forest Support Vector Machine Agricultural Machine Learning Precision Agriculture Ensemble Learning