CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Blockchain Framework for Examination Result Processing System for a Kenyan University

by Ochieng Bostone, Tom Kwanya, Hesbon Nyagowa
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 186 - Number 52
Year of Publication: 2024
Authors: Ochieng Bostone, Tom Kwanya, Hesbon Nyagowa
10.5120/ijca2024924191

Ochieng Bostone, Tom Kwanya, Hesbon Nyagowa . Blockchain Framework for Examination Result Processing System for a Kenyan University. International Journal of Computer Applications. 186, 52 ( Dec 2024), 24-31. DOI=10.5120/ijca2024924191

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2024924191,
author = { Ochieng Bostone, Tom Kwanya, Hesbon Nyagowa },
title = { Blockchain Framework for Examination Result Processing System for a Kenyan University },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2024 },
volume = { 186 },
number = { 52 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2024 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 24-31 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume186/number52/blockchain-framework-for-examination-result-processing-system-for-a-kenyan-university/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2024924191 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-12-07T02:20:16.124956+05:30
%A Ochieng Bostone
%A Tom Kwanya
%A Hesbon Nyagowa
%T Blockchain Framework for Examination Result Processing System for a Kenyan University
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 186
%N 52
%P 24-31
%D 2024
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to propose a Blockchain framework for decentralising the examination result processing system in a Kenyan university. The study used a pragmatic research approach involving qualitative and quantitative methods. The target population was comprised of lecturers and examination administrators at the university. The sample size was 297 respondents, and the results were derived using the Taro Yamens formula from the study population. Stratified sampling was used on lecturers, and purposive sampling was used on Examination administrators. Data was collected using questionnaires and interview schedules. Interviews were conducted with the examination administrators, while questionnaires were administered to lecturers. The data was analysed using inferential statistics for the quantitative data and thematic analysis for quanlitative data, respectively. The findings affirm that Blockchain technology aligns with the objectives of improving system integrity and security, making it a compelling solution to consider and propose within a university's academic ecosystem. Blockchain technology also has the potential to address key concerns and align with the desires of users for a more robust and trustworthy examination result processing system in a university. This study recommends adopting the Blockchain Technological Framework for the Examination Result Processing System to enhance integrity and security. Further research can be done on designing and developing the Blockchain examination result processing system, which can be integrated into the higher education examination result processing systems. This research is a valuable resource for academics, practitioners, and policymakers, offering insights to inform decision-making and advance the subject matter.

References
  1. Alammary, A., Alhazmi, S., Almasri, M., & Gillani, S. (2019). Blockchain-Based Applications in Education: A Systematic Review. Appllied Science.
  2. Baiod, W., Light, J., & Mahanti, A. (2021). Blockchain Technology and its Applications Across Multiple Domains: A Survey. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 29(4), 78–119. https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1482
  3. Bucea-Manea-țoniş, R., Martins, O. M. D., Bucea-Manea-țoniş, R., Gheorghiță, C., Kuleto, V., Ilić, M. P., & Simion, V. E. (2021). Blockchain technology enhances sustainable higher education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212347
  4. Irannezhad, E., & Faroqi, H. (2021). Addressing some of bill of lading issues using the Internet of Things and blockchain technologies: a digitalised conceptual framework. Maritime Policy and Management, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1930223
  5. Islam, A., & Shin, S. Y. (2019). BUS: A Blockchain-Enabled Data Acquisition Scheme with the Assistance of UAV Swarm in Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 7(August), 103231–103249. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930774
  6. Judijanto, L., & Gamaliel, F. (2024). Analysing the Impact of Blockchain Technology on Transaction Security with a Bibliometric Perspective Article Info ABSTRACT. The Eastasouth Journal of Information System and Computer Science, 1(03), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.58812/esiscs.v1i03
  7. Khatter, K., & DevanjaliRelan. (2022). Non-functional requirements for Blockchain enabled medical supply chain. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 13(3), 1219–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01418-y
  8. Mohammed, M. S., & Hashim, A. N. (2023). Blockchain technology, methodology behind it, and its most extensively used encryption techniques. Al-Salam Journal for Engineering and Technology, 2(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.55145/ajest.2023.02.02.017
  9. Nguyen, G. N., Viet, N. H. Le, Elhoseny, M., Shankar, K., Gupta, B. B., & El-Latif, A. A. A. (2021). Secure Blockchain enabled Cyber–physical systems in healthcare using deep belief network with ResNet model. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 153, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPDC.2021.03.011
  10. Niranjanamurthy, M., Nithya, B. N., & Jagannatha, S. (2018). Analysis of Blockchain technology: pros, cons and SWOT. Cluster Computing 2018 22:6, 22(6), 14743–14757. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10586-018-2387-5
  11. Nizamuddin, N., Salah, K., Ajmal Azad, M., Arshad, J., & Rehman, M. H. (2019). Decentralised document version control using ethereum blockchain and IPFS. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 76, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.03.014
  12. S, S., & Wang, H. (2021). Security Enhancement in Smart Vehicle Using Blockchain-based Architectural Framework. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Capsule Networks, 3(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.36548/jaicn.2021.2.002
  13. Sedlmeir, J., Lautenschlager, J., Fridgen, G., & Urbach, N. (2022). The transparency challenge of Blockchain in organisations. Electronic Markets. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00536-0
  14. Wang, X. (2024). Blockchain security and applications: A comprehensive analysis from hash functions to consensus algorithms. Theoretical and Natural Science, 31(1), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/31/20240862
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Blockchain framework examination processing decentralisation integrity security