CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Gender Diversity in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping

by Sarah Alkoblan, Hala Almukhalfi, Sahar Alturki, Muna Al-Razgan
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 186 - Number 46
Year of Publication: 2024
Authors: Sarah Alkoblan, Hala Almukhalfi, Sahar Alturki, Muna Al-Razgan
10.5120/ijca2024924098

Sarah Alkoblan, Hala Almukhalfi, Sahar Alturki, Muna Al-Razgan . Gender Diversity in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping. International Journal of Computer Applications. 186, 46 ( Nov 2024), 24-37. DOI=10.5120/ijca2024924098

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2024924098,
author = { Sarah Alkoblan, Hala Almukhalfi, Sahar Alturki, Muna Al-Razgan },
title = { Gender Diversity in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Nov 2024 },
volume = { 186 },
number = { 46 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2024 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 24-37 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume186/number46/gender-diversity-in-software-engineering-a-systematic-mapping/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2024924098 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-11-08T23:09:21.258976+05:30
%A Sarah Alkoblan
%A Hala Almukhalfi
%A Sahar Alturki
%A Muna Al-Razgan
%T Gender Diversity in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 186
%N 46
%P 24-37
%D 2024
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Gender diversity in software engineering has become a focus of growing interest in recent years. As the field continues to grow and evolve, it is crucial to understand the current state of research on this topic. This systematic mapping aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature on gender diversity in software engineering by analyzing 58 relevant studies from reputable academic databases and conferences relevant to the field of software engineering. This study addresses seven research questions concerning bibliographic details, methodologies employed, distribution across the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK), data sources, types of empirical research, main topics discussed within the scope of gender diversity, and the challenges faced by women in software engineering. These findings will provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to promote gender diversity and inclusivity in software engineering.

References
  1. E. D. Canedo, H. A. Tives, M. B. Marioti, F. Fagundes, and J. A. S. de Cerqueira, ‘Barriers faced by women in software development projects’, Information, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 309, 2019.
  2. A. Murphy, B. Kelly, K. Bergmann, K. Khaletskyy, R. V. O’Connor, and P. M. Clarke, ‘Examining unequal gender distribution in software engineering’, in Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement: 26th European Conference, EuroSPI 2019, Edinburgh, UK, September 18–20, 2019, Proceedings 26, Springer, 2019, pp. 659–671.
  3. K. Kohl and R. Prikladnicki, ‘Benefits and difficulties of gender diversity on software development teams: A qualitative study’, in Proceedings of the XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, 2022, pp. 21–30.
  4. K. Albusays et al., ‘The diversity crisis in software development’, IEEE Softw., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 19–25, 2021.
  5. G. Rodríguez-Pérez, R. Nadri, and M. Nagappan, ‘Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review’, Empir. Softw. Eng., vol. 26, pp. 1–38, 2021.
  6. K. K. Silveira and R. Prikladnicki, ‘A systematic mapping study of diversity in software engineering: a perspective from the agile methodologies’, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 12th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE), IEEE, 2019, pp. 7–10.
  7. A. W. Wilson and J. D. Patón-Romero, ‘Gender equality in tech entrepreneurship: A systematic mapping study’, in Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Gender Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering, 2022, pp. 51–58.
  8. J. D. Patón-Romero, S. Block, C. Ayala, and L. Jaccheri, ‘Gender Equality in Information Technology Processes: A Systematic Mapping Study’, in Future of Information and Communication Conference, Springer, 2023, pp. 310–327.
  9. M. Spichkova, H. Schmidt, and C. Trubiani, ‘Role of women in software architecture: an attempt at a systematic literature review’, in Proceedings of the 11th European conference on software architecture: companion proceedings, 2017, pp. 31–34.
  10. S. Keele and others, ‘Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering’. Technical report, ver. 2.3 ebse technical report. ebse, 2007.
  11. P. Wurzelova, F. Palomba, and A. Bacchelli, ‘Characterizing Women (Not) Contributing to Open-Source’, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering (GE), Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, May 2019, pp. 5–8. doi: 10.1109/GE.2019.00009.
  12. H. S. Qiu, A. Nolte, A. Brown, A. Serebrenik, and B. Vasilescu, ‘Going Farther Together: The Impact of Social Capital on Sustained Participation in Open Source’, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, May 2019, pp. 688–699. doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00078.
  13. A. May, J. Wachs, and A. Hannák, ‘Gender differences in participation and reward on Stack Overflow’, Empir. Softw. Eng., vol. 24, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10664-019-09685-x.
  14. A. Nguyen-Duc, L. Jaccheri, and P. Abrahamsson, ‘An Empirical Study on Female Participation in Software Project Courses’, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion), Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, May 2019, pp. 240–241. doi: 10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00094.
  15. A. T. Sabir, H. S. Maghdid, S. M. Asaad, M. H. Ahmed, and A. T. Asaad, ‘Gait-based Gender Classification Using Smartphone Accelerometer Sensor’, in 2019 5th International Conference on Frontiers of Signal Processing (ICFSP), Marseille, France: IEEE, Sep. 2019, pp. 12–20. doi: 10.1109/ICFSP48124.2019.8938033.
  16. D. Rossi and S. Zacchiroli, ‘Worldwide gender differences in public code contributions: and how they have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic’, in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: ACM, May 2022, pp. 172–183. doi: 10.1145/3510458.3513011.
  17. N. Imtiaz, J. Middleton, J. Chakraborty, N. Robson, G. Bai, and E. Murphy-Hill, ‘Investigating the Effects of Gender Bias on GitHub’, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, May 2019, pp. 700–711. doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00079.
  18. V. Singh and W. Brandon, ‘Open Source Software Community Inclusion Initiatives to Support Women Participation’, in Open Source Systems, vol. 556, F. Bordeleau, A. Sillitti, P. Meirelles, and V. Lenarduzzi, Eds., in IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 556. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 68–79. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20883-7_7.
  19. Y. Wang and D. Redmiles, ‘Implicit Gender Biases in Professional Software Development: An Empirical Study’, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS), Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, May 2019, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1109/ICSE-SEIS.2019.00009.
  20. S. Hyrynsalmi and S. Hyrynsalmi, ‘Software Engineering Studies Attractiveness for the Highly Educated Women Planning to Change Career in Finland’, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion), Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, May 2019, pp. 304–305. doi: 10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00126.
  21. B. Buhnova, L. Jurystova, and D. Prikrylova, ‘Assisting women in career change towards software engineering: experience from Czechitas NGO’, in Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Software Architecture - Volume 2, Paris France: ACM, Sep. 2019, pp. 88–93. doi: 10.1145/3344948.3344967.
  22. G. Catolino, F. Palomba, D. A. Tamburri, A. Serebrenik, and F. Ferrucci, ‘Gender Diversity and Women in Software Teams: How Do They Affect Community Smells?’, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS), Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, May 2019, pp. 11–20. doi: 10.1109/ICSE-SEIS.2019.00010.
  23. C. Hilderbrand et al., ‘Engineering gender-inclusivity into software: ten teams’ tales from the trenches’, in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Seoul South Korea: ACM, Jun. 2020, pp. 433–444. doi: 10.1145/3377811.3380371.
  24. D. Russo and K.-J. Stol, ‘Gender Differences in Personality Traits of Software Engineers’, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 48, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TSE.2020.3003413.
  25. A. Wolff, A. Knutas, and P. Savolainen, ‘What prevents finnish women from applying to software engineering roles?: a preliminary analysis of survey data’, in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training, Seoul South Korea: ACM, Jun. 2020, pp. 93–102. doi: 10.1145/3377814.3381708.
  26. E. D. Canedo, R. Bonifácio, M. V. Okimoto, A. Serebrenik, G. Pinto, and E. Monteiro, ‘Work Practices and Perceptions from Women Core Developers in OSS Communities’, in Proceedings of the 14th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), Bari Italy: ACM, Oct. 2020, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1145/3382494.3410682.
  27. L. Happe and B. Buhnova, ‘Frustrations Steering Women Away From Software Engineering’, IEEE Softw., vol. 39, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1109/MS.2021.3099077.
  28. K. Stakoulas, K. Georgiou, N. Mittas, and L. Angelis, ‘An Analysis of User Profiles from Covid-19 Questions in Stack Overflow’, in 25th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Volos Greece: ACM, Nov. 2021, pp. 419–424. doi: 10.1145/3503823.3503900.
  29. S. E. Kwon, Y. T. Kim, H. Suh, and H. Lee, ‘Identifying the mobile application repertoire based on weighted formal concept analysis’, Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 173, p. 114678, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114678.
  30. B. Trinkenreich, ‘Please Don’t Go — Increasing Women’s Participation in Open Source Software’, in 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion), Madrid, ES: IEEE, May 2021, pp. 138–140. doi: 10.1109/ICSE-Companion52605.2021.00059.
  31. E. Zolduoarrati and S. A. Licorish, ‘On the value of encouraging gender tolerance and inclusiveness in software engineering communities’, Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 139, p. 106667, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106667.
  32. A. Foundjem, E. Eghan, and B. Adams, ‘Onboarding vs. Diversity, Productivity and Quality — Empirical Study of the OpenStack Ecosystem’, in 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Madrid, ES: IEEE, May 2021, pp. 1033–1045. doi: 10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00097.
  33. G. A. A. Prana, D. Ford, A. Rastogi, D. Lo, R. Purandare, and N. Nagappan, ‘Including Everyone, Everywhere: Understanding Opportunities and Challenges of Geographic Gender-Inclusion in OSS’, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 48, no. 9, Art. no. 9, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TSE.2021.3092813.
  34. H. Frluckaj, L. Dabbish, D. G. Widder, H. S. Qiu, and J. D. Herbsleb, ‘Gender and Participation in Open Source Software Development’, Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 6, no. CSCW2, Art. no. CSCW2, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3555190.
  35. M. Travers, I. Richardson, and L. Higgins, ‘Challenges and opportunities when deploying a gender STEM intervention during a pandemic’, in Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Gender Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: ACM, May 2022, pp. 59–66. doi: 10.1145/3524501.3527596.
  36. P. Weichbroth, ‘An Empirical Study on the Impact of Gender on Mobile Applications Usability’, IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 119419–119436, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3219421.
  37. U. L. Yuhana, U. Sa’adah, C. K. J. Indraswari, S. Rochimah, and M. B. A. Rasyid, ‘Classifying Composition of Software Development Team Using Machine Learning Techniques’, in 2022 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM), Surabaya, Indonesia: IEEE, Nov. 2022, pp. 122–127. doi: 10.1109/CENIM56801.2022.10037407.
  38. K. Khadilkar, A. R. KhudaBukhsh, and T. M. Mitchell, ‘Gender bias, social bias, and representation in Bollywood and Hollywood’, Patterns, vol. 3, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100409.
  39. H. Khalajzadeh, M. Shahin, H. O. Obie, and J. Grundy, ‘How are diverse end-user human-centric issues discussed on GitHub?’, in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: ACM, May 2022, pp. 79–89. doi: 10.1145/3510458.3513014.
  40. B. Trinkenreich, R. Britto, M. A. Gerosa, and I. Steinmacher, ‘An empirical investigation on the challenges faced by women in the software industry: a case study’, in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: ACM, May 2022, pp. 24–35. doi: 10.1145/3510458.3513018.
  41. S. Motogna, L. Alboaie, I. A. Todericiu, and C. Zaharia, ‘Retaining women in computer science: the good, the bad and the ugly sides’, in Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Gender Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: ACM, May 2022, pp. 35–42. doi: 10.1145/3524501.3527598.
  42. H. S. Qiu and M. Connell, ‘Seeking new measures for gender bias effects in open-source software’, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: ACM, May 2022, pp. 56–60. doi: 10.1145/3528579.3529169.
  43. M. Shahin, C. Gonsalvez, J. Whittle, C. Chen, L. Li, and X. Xia, ‘How secondary school girls perceive Computational Thinking practices through collaborative programming with the micro:bit’, J. Syst. Softw., vol. 183, p. 111107, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.111107.
  44. S. Sultana, ‘Identification and Mitigation of Gender Biases to Promote Diversity and Inclusion among Open Source Communities’, in Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Rochester MI USA: ACM, Oct. 2022, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1145/3551349.3559571.
  45. N. Donnelly and L. Stapleton, ‘The Social Impact of Data Processing: The Case of Gender Mapped to Sex.’, IFAC-Pap., vol. 55, no. 39, Art. no. 39, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.12.021.
  46. T. Kanij, J. Grundy, J. McIntosh, A. Sarma, and G. Aniruddha, ‘A new approach towards ensuring gender inclusive SE job advertisements’, in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: ACM, May 2022, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1145/3510458.3513016.
  47. N. Tahsin, N. S. Ahmed, M. Asad, and K. Sakib, ‘Can female underrepresentation in information technology be solved through an awareness-based approach?’, in Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Gender Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: ACM, May 2022, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1145/3524501.3527606.
  48. M. Fazzini et al., ‘Characterizing human aspects in reviews of COVID-19 apps’, in Proceedings of the 9th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: ACM, May 2022, pp. 38–49. doi: 10.1145/3524613.3527814.
  49. E. Noei and K. Lyons, ‘A study of gender in user reviews on the Google Play Store’, Empir. Softw. Eng., vol. 27, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10664-021-10080-8.
  50. A. I. Champa, M. F. Rabbi, M. F. Zibran, and M. R. Islam, ‘Insights into Female Contributions in Open-Source Projects’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 20th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 357–361. doi: 10.1109/MSR59073.2023.00055.
  51. H. S. Qiu et al., ‘Gender Representation Among Contributors to Open-Source Infrastructure : An Analysis of 20 Package Manager Ecosystems’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 180–187. doi: 10.1109/ICSE-SEIS58686.2023.00025.
  52. R. Garcia, C. Treude, and W. La, ‘Towards Understanding the Open Source Interest in Gender-Related GitHub Projects’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 68–79. doi: 10.1109/CHASE58964.2023.00016.
  53. S. Sultana, A. K. Turzo, and A. Bosu, ‘Code reviews in open source projects : how do gender biases affect participation and outcomes?’, Empir. Softw. Eng., vol. 28, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10664-023-10324-9.
  54. L. Paganini, K. Gama, A. Nolte, and A. Serebrenik, ‘Opportunities and constraints of women-focused online hackathons’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 4th Workshop on Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering (GEICSE), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 33–40. doi: 10.1109/GEICSE59319.2023.00009.
  55. N. R. Weeraddana, X. Xu, M. Alfadel, S. McIntosh, and M. Nagappan, ‘An empirical comparison of ethnic and gender diversity of DevOps and non-DevOps contributions to open-source projects’, Empir. Softw. Eng., vol. 28, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10664-023-10394-9.
  56. S. Van Breukelen, A. Barcombt, S. Baltes, and A. Serebrenik, ‘“STILL AROUND”: Experiences and Survival Strategies of Veteran Women Software Developers’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 1148–1160. doi: 10.1109/ICSE48619.2023.00103.
  57. M. Shahin, M. Zahedi, H. Khalajzadeh, and A. Rezaei Nasab, ‘A Study of Gender Discussions in Mobile Apps’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 20th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 598–610. doi: 10.1109/MSR59073.2023.00086.
  58. J. Zhu, S. J. Lunn, and M. Ross, ‘Characterizing Women’s Alternative Pathways to a Computing Career Using Content Analysis’, in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, Toronto ON Canada: ACM, Mar. 2023, pp. 158–164. doi: 10.1145/3545945.3569798.
  59. N. Tahsin, M. A. Hasan, R. Islam, and K. Sakib, ‘Cognitive Distance and Women in Software Engineering: An Empirical Study in the Context of Bangladesh’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 4th Workshop on Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering (GEICSE), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/GEICSE59319.2023.00005.
  60. V. Singh and W. Brandon, ‘Discrimination, misogyny and harassment: Examples from OSS: content analysis of women-focused online discussion forums’, in Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Gender Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: ACM, May 2022, pp. 71–79. doi: 10.1145/3524501.3527602.
  61. R. Schuerkamp, J. Barrett, A. Bales, A. Wegner, and P. J. Giabbanelli, ‘Enabling new interactions with library digital collections: automatic gender recognition in historical postcards via deep learning’, J. Acad. Librariansh., vol. 49, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102736.
  62. K. Marquardt, I. Wagner, and L. Happe, ‘Engaging Girls in Computer Science: Do Single-Gender Interdisciplinary Classes Help?’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 128–140. doi: 10.1109/ICSE-SEET58685.2023.00019.
  63. N. N. Arony, K. Devathasan, Z. S. Li, and D. Damian, ‘Leveraging Diversity in Software Engineering Education through Community Engaged Learning and a Supportive Network’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 247–258. doi: 10.1109/ICSE-SEET58685.2023.00029.
  64. V. Simon, N. Rabin, and H. C.-B. Gal, ‘Utilizing data driven methods to identify gender bias in LinkedIn profiles’, Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 60, no. 5, Art. no. 5, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103423.
  65. M. A. Petrescu, S. Motogna, and L. Berciu, ‘Women in Scrum Master Role: Challenges and Opportunities*’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 4th Workshop on Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering (GEICSE), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 49–55. doi: 10.1109/GEICSE59319.2023.00011.
  66. C. Treude and H. Hata, ‘She Elicits Requirements and He Tests: Software Engineering Gender Bias in Large Language Models’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 20th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 624–629. doi: 10.1109/MSR59073.2023.00088.
  67. I. Graßl and G. Fraser, ‘The ABC of Pair Programming: Gender-dependent Attitude, Behavior and Code of Young Learners’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 115–127. doi: 10.1109/ICSE-SEET58685.2023.00018.
  68. L. Rocha, E. D. Canedo, C. Pinto Pereira, C. Bezerra, and F. F. Mendes, ‘Investigating the Perceived Impact of Maternity on Software Engineering: a Women’s Perspective’, in 2023 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 138–149. doi: 10.1109/CHASE58964.2023.00023.
  69. P. Bourque and R. Dupuis, ‘Software engineering body of knowledge (SWEBOK)’, IEEE Comput. Soc. EUA, 2004.
  70. B. Trinkenreich, I. Wiese, A. Sarma, M. Gerosa, and I. Steinmacher, ‘Women’s participation in open source software: A survey of the literature’, ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. TOSEM, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1–37, 2022.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences
Systematic mapping
Gender diversity
Software engineering
SMS

Keywords

Systematic mapping Gender diversity Software engineering SMS