CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

The Impact of ChatGPT on Higher Education

by Niraj Kumar Rai, Aditya Bansal, Arpita, Monika Arya, Rashmi Shekhar
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 186 - Number 40
Year of Publication: 2024
Authors: Niraj Kumar Rai, Aditya Bansal, Arpita, Monika Arya, Rashmi Shekhar
10.5120/ijca2024923998

Niraj Kumar Rai, Aditya Bansal, Arpita, Monika Arya, Rashmi Shekhar . The Impact of ChatGPT on Higher Education. International Journal of Computer Applications. 186, 40 ( Sep 2024), 47-59. DOI=10.5120/ijca2024923998

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2024923998,
author = { Niraj Kumar Rai, Aditya Bansal, Arpita, Monika Arya, Rashmi Shekhar },
title = { The Impact of ChatGPT on Higher Education },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Sep 2024 },
volume = { 186 },
number = { 40 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2024 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 47-59 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume186/number40/the-impact-of-chatgpt-on-higher-education/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2024923998 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-09-27T00:46:19.282492+05:30
%A Niraj Kumar Rai
%A Aditya Bansal
%A Arpita
%A Monika Arya
%A Rashmi Shekhar
%T The Impact of ChatGPT on Higher Education
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 186
%N 40
%P 47-59
%D 2024
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This study delves into the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots, with a specific focus on OpenAI’s ChatGPT, on Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Given the rapid advancements in AI technology, understanding its implications in the educational sector has become increasingly crucial. Styles using databases similar as PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, we totally searched for literature concerning the impact of AI chatbots on HEIs. Our selection criteria prioritized peer- reviewed papers, estimable media outlets, and English- language publications, banning supplemental mentions of AI chatbots. Upon selection, data birth centered on authorship, study design, and primary findings. The literature review unveiled different perspectives on ChatGPT’s implicit benefactions to education. Notable benefits included bolstering exploration capabilities, easing automated grading, and enhancing mortal- computer commerce. still, enterprises similar as securing online assessments, plagiarism forestalment, and broader societal and profitable counteraccusations similar as job relegation, difference in digital knowledge, and AI- related anxiety — were prominently linked. The study underlined ChatGPT’s transformative armature and its protean operations in educational settings. also, implicit advantages similar as streamlined registration processes, bettered pupil services, tutoring inventions, exploration support, and heightened pupil retention were emphasized. Again, pitfalls similar as sequestration breaches, abuse, bias, dispersion of misinformation, reduced mortal commerce, and availability challenges were conceded. While the global expansion of AI is inarguable, there's a critical call for balanced regulation in its integration within HEIs. Faculty members are encouraged to borrow AI tools like ChatGPT proactively and immorally to alleviate pitfalls, particularly in combating academic fraud. Despite limitations, including an deficient definition of AI’s overall impact on education and the absence of concrete integration guidelines, it's apparent that AI technologies like ChatGPT offer substantial benefits alongside pitfalls. The study advocates for a conscientious and responsible approach to integrating these technologies within HEIs.

References
  1. N. Davis et al., "AI in Education: Exploring the Role of Chatbots," Frontiers in Education, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 233-245, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936/full.
  2. Agarwal, N., Danielsen, N., Gravdal, P., and Bours, P. (2022). Contract cheat detection using biometric keystroke dynamics. 20th international conference on emerging eLearning technologies and applications (ICETA). IEEE Xplore, 15–21
  3. Agulla, E., Rifón, L., Castro, J., and Mateo, C. (2008). Is my student on the other side? Applying biometric web authentication to E-learning environments. Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, IEEE Xplore, 551–553
  4. AI Index Steering Committee (2023). Artificial intelligence index report 2023. Stanford University, Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI). Retrieved from https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/HAI_AI-Index-Report_2023.pdf
  5. Akgun, S., and Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI Ethics 2, 431–440. doi: 10.1007/ s43681-021-00096-7
  6. AlDhaen, F. (2022) in The use of artificial intelligence in higher education – systematic review. ed. M. Alaali (Cham: COVID-19 Challenges to University Information Technology Governance, Springer)
  7. Alerskans, E., Nyborg, J., Birk, M., and Kaas, E. (2022). A transformer neural network for predicting near-surface temperature. Meteorol. App. 29, 1–9. doi: 10.1002/met.2098
  8. Allen Institute for AI. (n.d.). Grover - a state-of-the-art defense against neural fake news. Available at: https://grover.allenai.org/detect (Accessed April 8, 2023).
  9. Alrawi, M. (2023). Davos 2023: AI chatbot to ‘change education forever within six months’. The National News, January 17, 2023. Available at: https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/2023/01/17/davos-2023-ai-chatbot-to-changeeducation-forever-within-six-months/ (Accessed January 22, 2023).
  10. Altman, S. (2022). ChatGPT launched on Wednesday. Today it crossed 1 million users! [tweet]. Twitter. Available at: https://twitter.com/sama/status/1599668808285028353 (Accessed January 1, 2023).
  11. Arun, K., Nagesh, S., and Ganga, P. (2019). A multi-model and Ai-based Collegebot management system (Aicms) for professional engineering colleges. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 8, 2910–2914. doi: 10.35940/ijitee.I8818.078919arXiv:2302.06476. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2302.06476
  12. Baidoo-Anu, D., and Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN Preprint (January 25, 2023). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4337484
  13. Bang, Y., Cahyawijaya, S., Lee, N., Dai, W., Su, D., and Fung, P. (2023). A multitask, multilingual, multimodal evaluation of ChatGPT on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.04023
  14. Bastiansen, M., Kroon, A., and Araujo, T. (2022). Female chatbots are helpful, male chatbots are competent? Publizistik 67, 601–623. doi: 10.1007/s11616-022-00762-8
  15. Bellapu, A. (2021). Why transformer model for natural language processing? Analytics Insight. Available at: https://www.analyticsinsight.net/why-transformer-model-fornatural-language-processing/ (Accessed January 1, 2023).
  16. Bendig, E., Erb, B., Schulze-Thuesing, L., and Baumeister, H. (2019). The next generation: Chatbots in clinical psychology and psychotherapy to foster mental health–a scoping review. Verhaltenstherapie 29, 266–280. doi: 10.1159/000499492
  17. Bengio, Y., Russell, S., and Musk, E., (2020). Pause giant AI experiments: AN OPEN LETTER. Available at: https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ (Accessed April 1, 2023).
  18. Benotti, L., Martnez, M., and Schapachnik, F. (2018). A tool for introducing computer science with automatic formative assessment. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 11, 179–192.
  19. Bensinger, G. (2023). ChatGPT launches boom in AI-written e-books on Amazon. Reuter. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-launches-boom-aiwritten-e-books-amazon-2023-02-21/ (Accessed March 4, 2023).
  20. Bhuiyan, J. (2023). ‘We have to move fast’: US looks to establish rules for artificial intelligence. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/ apr/11/us-artificial-intelligence-rules-accountability-measures (Accessed April 13, 2023).
  21. Biswas, S. S. (2023a). Potential use of chat GPT in global warming. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 51, 1126–1127. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03171-8
  22. Biswas, S. S. (2023b). Role of chat GPT in public health. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 51, 868–869. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03172-7
  23. Brito, C., Ciampi, M., Sluss, J., and Santos, H. (2019). Trends in engineering education: a disruptive view for not so far future. 2019 18th international conference on information technology based higher education and training (ITHET), 1–5
  24. Brodkin, J, (2023). GPT-4 poses too many risks, and releases should be halted, AI group tells FTC. Available at: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/03/ftc-shouldinvestigate-openai-and-halt-gpt-4-releases-ai-research-group-says/ (Accessed April 1, 2023).
  25. Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., and Zhang, Y. (2023). Sparks of artificial general intelligence: early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.12712
  26. Bushwick, S., and Mukerjee, M. (2022). ChatGPT explains why AIs like ChatGPT should be regulated. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chatgptexplains-why-ais-like-chatgpt-should-be-regulated/ (Accessed January 1, 2023).
  27. Cao, Z., Wei, F., Li, W., and Li, S. (2017). Faithful to the original: fact aware neural abstractive summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04434v1 [cs.IR]. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.1711.04434
  28. Cassidy, C. (2023). Australian universities to return to ‘pen and paper’ exams after students caught using AI to write essays. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/ australia-news/2023/jan/10/universities-to-return-to-pen-and-paper-exams-afterstudents-caught-using-ai-to-write-essays (Accessed January 18, 2023).
  29. Castangia, M., Medina, L., Aliberti, A., Rossi, C., Macii, A., Macii, E., et al. (2023). Transformer neural networks for interpretable flood forecasting. Environ. Model. Softw. 160:105581. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105581
  30. Certainly, "AI and Chatbot Trends in 2024," [Online]. Available: https://certainly.io/blog/ai-and-chatbot-trends-in-2024/. Accessed: July 21, 2024.
  31. Chance, C. (2022). Has there been a second AI big Bang? Forbes. Available at: https:// www.forbes.com/sites/calumchace/2022/10/18/has-there-been-a-second-ai-bigbang/?sh=7f7860fb6f74 (Accessed January 1, 2023).
  32. Chavez, H., Chavez-Arias, B., Contreras-Rosas, S., Alvarez-Rodríguez, J. M., and Raymundo, C. (2023). Artificial neural network model to predict student performance using non-personal information. Front Educ. 8:1106679. doi: 10.3389/ feduc.2023.1106679chb.2017.05.045
  33. Chen, S. (2023). ChatGPT-5 rumored to launch at the end of 2023, will it achieve AGI? [blog post]. Available at: https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/04/01/chatgpt-5-rumoredto-launch-at-the-end-of-2023-will-it-achieve-agi/ (Accessed April 2, 2023).
  34. Clarizia, F., Colace, F., Lombardi, M., Pascale, F., and Santaniello, D. (2018). Chatbot: an education support system for students. In: A. Castiglione, F. Pop, M. Ficco and F. Palmieri (Eds) Cyberspace safety and security, 11161. Springer: Cham
  35. ColdFusion. (2022). It’s time to pay attention to A.I. (ChatGPT and beyond) [video].
  36. Crossplag (n.d.). AI content detector. Available at: https://crossplag.com/ai-contentdetector/ (Accessed April 8, 2023).
  37. Cunningham-Nelson, S., Boles, W., Trouton, L., and Margerison, E. (2019). A review of Chatbots in education: practical steps forward. Proceedings of the AAEE2019 conference Brisbane, Australia. Available at: https://aaee.net.au/wp-content/ uploads/2020/07/AAEE2019_Annual_Conference_paper_184.pdf
  38. D. A. Smith, "Enhancing Education through AI and Chatbots," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 34-47, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1358684X.2024.2309995.
  39. Dastin, J., Hu, K., and Dave, P. (2022). Exclusive: ChatGPT owner OpenAI projects $1 billion in revenue by 2024. Reuters. Retrieved from (https://www.reuters.com/business/ chatgpt-owner-openai-projects-1-billion-revenue-by-2024-sources-2022-12-15/).
  40. Digit. Health 5, e107–e108. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00021-3Pavlik, J. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. J. Mass Commun. Educ 78, 84–93. doi: 10.1177/10776958221149577
  41. Digital Ocean, "AI in Fraud Detection," [Online]. Available: https://www.digitalocean.com/resources/article/ai-fraud-detection. Accessed: July 21, 2024.doi: 10.1109/TLT.2017.2682084
  42. Drapkin, A. (2024) GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-4: What is OpenAI’s CHATGPT Turbo?, Tech.co. Available at: https://tech.co/news/gpt-4-turbo-vs-gpt-4-openai-chatgpt (Accessed: 05 March 2024).
  43. Durall, E., and Kapros, E. (2020). Co-design for a competency self-assessment Chatbot and survey in science education. In: P. Zaphiris and A. Ioannou (Eds) Learning and collaboration technologies. Human and technology ecosystems, Springer: Cham, 12206
  44. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., et al. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice, and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 71:102642. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  45. Edwards, B. (2024) OpenAI updates CHATGPT-4 model with potential fix for AI ‘laziness’ problem, Ars Technica. Available at: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/01/openai-updates-chatgpt-model-with-potential-fix-for-ai-laziness-problem/ (Accessed: 10 March 2024).
  46. Elecrow. (2023). Introducing ChatGPT4: the next generation of language models. Elecrow. Available at: https://www.elecrow.com/blog/introducing-chatgpt4-the-nextgeneration%C2%A0of%C2%A0language-models.html (Accessed March 3, 2023).
  47. Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., and Rock, D. (2023). GPTs are GPTs: an early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models. Available at: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2003.10130v4 (Accessed April 1, 2023).
  48. Essel, H., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E., and Baah, P. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students’ learning in Ghanaian higher education. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 19, 1–19. doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6 eswa.2022.116993
  49. Falke, T., Ribeiro, L., Utama, P., Dagan, I., and Gurevych, I. (2019). Ranking generated summaries by correctness: an interesting but challenging application for natural language inference. In Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2214–2220
  50. Fawaz, A. (2024) OpenAI claims the times hacked chatgpt for evidence in lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI, Neowin. Available at: https://www.neowin.net/news/openai-claims-the-times-hacked-chatgpt-for-evidence-in-lawsuit-against-microsoft-and-openai/ (Accessed: 19 March 2024).
  51. Felix, C. (2020). “The role of the teacher and AI in education” in International perspectives on the role of Technology in Humanizing Higher Education Innovations in higher education teaching and learning. eds. E. Sengupta, P. Blessinger and M. S. Makhanya, vol. 33 (Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited), 33–48.
  52. Felten, E., Raj, M., and Seamans, R. (2023). How will language modelers like ChatGPT affect occupations and industries? arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01157v2. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2303.01157
  53. Fitzpatrick, K., Darcy, A., and Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment. Health 4:e19. doi: 10.2196/mental.7785
  54. Fryer, L., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., and Sherlock, Z. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: an experimental comparison of chatbot and human task partners. Comput. Human Behav. 75, 461–468. doi: 10.1016/j.
  55. Fulmer, R., Joerin, A., Gentile, B., Lakerink, L., and Rauws, M. (2018). Using psychological artificial intelligence (Tess) to relieve symptoms of depression and anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment. Health 5:e64. doi: 10.2196/ mental.9782
  56. Gaceta, La (2023). Prohíben usar la ChatGPT en varias universidades. Available at: https://www.lagaceta.com.ar/nota/978320/sociedad/prohiben-usar-chatgpt-variasuniversidades.html (Accessed February 5, 2023).
  57. Gao, C., Howard, F., Markov, N., Dyer, E., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., et al. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. bioRxiv preprint 2022.12.23.521610. doi: 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
  58. Georgescu, A. (2018). Chatbots for education - trends, benefits, and challenges. Int. Sci. Conf. eLearn. Softw. Educ. 2, 195–200. doi: 10.12753/2066-026X-18-097
  59. GESTION (2023). Los primeros trabajos perdidos en Estados Unidos por la Inteligencia Artificial ChatGPT. Available at: https://gestion.pe/economia/managementempleo/chatgpt-los-primeros-trabajos-perdidos-en-estados-unidos-por-laimplementacion-de-la-inteligencia-artificial-nnda-nnlt-noticia/ (Accessed March 3, 2023).
  60. Ghosal, S. (2023). ChatGPT on characteristic mode analysis. TechRxiv Preprint. 70, 1008–1019. doi: 10.36227/techrxiv.21900342.v1
  61. Goldman, S. (2022). OpenAI CEO admits ChatGPT risks. What now? | the AI beat. VentureBeat. Available at: https://venturebeat.com/ai/openai-ceo-admits-chatgpt-riskswhat-now-the-ai-beat/ (Accessed January 1, 2023).
  62. GPT, Chat (2022). In Wikipedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT (Accessed January 1, 2023).
  63. GPT-2 Output Detector Demo (2022). Hugging Face, Inc. Available at: https:// huggingface.co/openai-detector/ (Accessed January 3, 2023).
  64. Hatzius, J., Briggs, J., Kodnani, D., and Pierdomenico, G. (2023). The potentially large effects of artificial intelligence on economic growth. Available at: https://www.key4biz. it/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Global-Economics-Analyst_-The-Potentially-LargeEffects-of-Artificial-Intelligence-on-Economic-Growth-Briggs_Kodnani.pdf (Accessed April 1, 2023).
  65. Hien, H., Cuong, P.-N., Nam, L., Nhung, H., and Thang, L. (2018). Intelligent assistants in higher-education environments: the fit-ebot, a chatbot for administrative and learning support. Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on info and communication technology, 69–76
  66. Hu, J. (2020). Online test proctoring claims to prevent cheating. But at what cost? SLATE. Available at: https://slate.com/technology/2020/10/online-proctoring-proctoruproctorio-cheating-research.html (Accessed January 3, 2023).
  67. Hu, K. (2023). ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base - analyst note. Reuters. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastestgrowing-user-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/ (Accessed February 5, 2023).
  68. Insights, Oxford. (2022). Government AI readiness index 2022. Available at: https://static1. squarespace.com/static/58b2e92c1e5b6c828058484e/t/639b495cc6b59c6 20c3ecde5/1671121299433/Government_AI_Readiness_2022_FV.pdf
  69. Islam, A., Kader, F., and Shin, S. (2018). BSSSQS: a Blockchain-based smart and secured scheme for question sharing in the Smart education system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.03917v1 [cs.CR]. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1812.03917
  70. Ismail, M., and Ade-Ibijola, A. (2019). Lecturer’s apprentice: a chatbot for assisting novice programmers. IEEE Xplore. 2019 international multidisciplinary information technology and engineering conference (IMITEC), 1–8
  71. J. K. Lee, "Sustainable Development in Higher Education through AI," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 5614, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5614.
  72. Jeblick, K., Schachtner, B., Dexl, J., Mittermeier, A., Stüber, A., Topalis, J., et al. (2022). ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14882v1 [cs.CL]. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2212.14882
  73. Kamalov, F., Sulieman, H., and Calonge, D. (2021). Machine learning-based approach to exam cheating detection. PLoS One 16:e0254340. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0254340
  74. Kasepalu, R., Prieto, L. P., Ley, T., and Chejara, P. (2022). Teacher artificial intelligencesupported pedagogical actions in collaborative learning coregulation: a wizard-of-Oz study. Front Educ. 7, 1–15. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.736194
  75. Kerly, A., and Bull, S. (2006). The potential for chatbots in negotiated learner modeling: a wizard-of-oz study. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci 4053, 443–452. doi: 10.1007/11774303_44
  76. Kim, S., Lee, J., and Gweon, G. (2019). “Comparing data from Chatbot and web surveys” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI, vol. 19, 1–12.
  77. King, M. R.chatGPT (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, Chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 16, 1–2. doi: 10.1007/ s12195-022-00754-8
  78. Klos, M., Escoredo, M., Joerin, A., Lemos, V., Rauws, M., and Bunge, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence–based Chatbot for anxiety and depression in university students: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Formative Res. 5:e20678. doi: 10.2196/20678
  79. Leavy, S. (2018). Gender bias in artificial intelligence: the need for diversity and gender theory in machine learning. In Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on gender equality in software engineering (GE ‘18). New York, NY, USA, 14–16
  80. Lee, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., and Chen, P. Y. (2022). Impacts of an AI chatbot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 70, 1843–1865. doi: 10.1007/ s11423-022-10142-8LG]. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2001.08317
  81. Libert, K. (2023). Only 34% of educators support the decision to ban ChatGPT. EINPRESSWIRE, January 16, 2023. Available at: https://www.einpresswire.com/ article/611597643/only-34-of-educators-support-the-decision-to-ban-chatgpt (Accessed January 22, 2023).
  82. Lopez-Lira, A., and Tang, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT forecast stock Price movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Models. SSRN Preprint. Available at: http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4412788
  83. Lukpat, A. (2023). ChatGPT banned in new York City public schools over concerns about cheating, learning development. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/ chatgpt-banned-in-new-york-city-public-schools-over-concerns-about-cheatinglearning-development-11673024059 (Accessed at January 8, 2023).
  84. Lund, B., and Agbaji, D. (2023). Information literacy, data literacy, privacy literacy, and ChatGPT: Technology literacies align with perspectives on emerging technology adoption within communities (January 14, 2023). SSRN Preprint. Available at: http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4324580
  85. L’Heureux, A., Grolinger, K., and Capretz, M. A. M. (2022). Transformer-based model for electrical load forecasting. Eng. 15:4993. doi: 10.3390/en15144993
  86. M. B. Russell, "The Growing Potential of Chatbots in Higher Education," The Chronicle of Higher Education, [Online].Available: https://sponsored.chronicle.com/the-growing-potential-of-chatbots-in-higher-education/index.html. Accessed: July 21, 2024.
  87. Mabunda, K., and Ade-Ibijola, A. (2019). Pathbot: an intelligent chatbot for guiding visitors and locating venues. IEEE Xplore. 2019 6th international conference on soft computing & machine intelligence (ISCMI), 160–168
  88. Maynez, J., Narayan, S., Bohnet, B., and McDonald, R. (2020). On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1906–1919
  89. McCallum, S. (2023). ChatGPT banned in Italy over privacy concerns. BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60929651 (Accessed April 13, 2023).
  90. Meckler, L., and Verma, P. (2022) Teachers are on alert for inevitable cheating after the release of ChatGPT. The Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/ education/2022/12/28/chatbot-cheating-ai-chatbotgpt-teachers/ (Accessed January 2, 2023).
  91. Miller, F., Katz, J., and Gans, R. (2018). AI x I = AI2: the OD imperative to add inclusion to the algorithms of artificial intelligence. OD Practitioner 5, 6–12.
  92. MIT Technology Review, "A Chatbot Helped More People Access Mental Health Services," [Online]. Available: https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/02/05/1087690/a-chatbot-helped-more-people-access-mental-health-services/. Accessed: July 21, 2024.
  93. MIT Technology Review, "What's Next for AI in 2024," [Online]. Available: https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/01/04/1086046/whats-next-for-ai-in-2024/. Accessed: July 21, 2024.
  94. Modelling and Graphics, 937. Springer: Singapore
  95. Murtarellia, G., Gregory, A., and Romentia, S. (2021). A conversation-based perspective for shaping ethical human–machine interactions: the particular challenge of chatbots. J. Bus. Res. 129, 927–935. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.018
  96. Nature, "Ethical Implications of AI in Education," Nature, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 123-135, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02464-6
  97. Norris, M. (2019). University online cheating -- how to mitigate the damage. Res. High. Educ. J. 37, 1–20.
  98. Nunamaker, J., Derrick, D., Elkins, A., Burgoon, J., and Patton, M. (2011). Embodied conversational agent-based kiosk for automated interviewing. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 28, 17–48. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222280102
  99. Okonkwo, C. W., and Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 2:100033. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033
  100. OpenAI (2022). Playground. Available at: www.OpenAI.com and https://beta.openai. com/playground
  101. OpenAI (2023). AI text classifier [website]. Available at: https://beta.openai.com/aitext-classifier (Accessed April 8, 2023).
  102. OpenAI (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774
  103. OpenAI (2023). GPT-4. Available at: https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 (Accessed April 9, 2023).
  104. Ordonez, V., Dunn, T., and Noll, E. (2023). OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says AI will reshape society, acknowledges risks: ‘a little bit scared of this’. Available at: https:// abcnews.go.com/Technology/openai-ceo-sam-altman-ai-reshape-societyacknowledges/story?id=76971838 (Accessed April1, 2023).
  105. Originality. AI – plagiarism checker and AI detector (2023). Available at: https:// originality.ai/#about (Accessed January 3, 2023).
  106. Ortiz, S. (2022). What is ChatGPT, and why does it matter? Here’s what you need to know. ZDNET. Available at: https://www.zdnet.com/article/what-is-chatgpt-and-whydoes-it-matter-heres-what-you-need-to-know/ (Accessed January 1, 2023).
  107. Pandey, A. (2024) CHATGPT can now read its responses aloud to you: How to use the feature, NewsBytes. Available at: https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/science/chatgpt-introduces-read-aloud-feature-for-ios-android/story (Accessed: 05 March 2024).
  108. Patel, S. B., and Lam, K. (2023). ChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries? Lancet
  109. Perry, N., Srivastava, M., Kumar, D., and Boneh, D. (2022). Do users write more insecure code with AI assistants? arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.03622v2 [cs.CR]. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2211.03622
  110. Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., and Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int. J. of Evid. Based Healthc. 13, 141–1461. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
  111. Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., et al. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evi. Synthesis 18, 2119–2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
  112. Pham, X., Pham, T., Nguyen, Q., Nguyen, T., and Cao, T. (2018). Chatbot as an intelligent personal assistant for mobile language learning. ICEEL 2018: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd international conference on education and E-learning, 16–21
  113. Pickard, M., Schuetzler, R., Valacich, J., and Wood, D. (2017). Next-generation accounting interviewing: a comparison of human and embodied conversational agents (ECAs) as interviewers. SSRN Electron. J. April, 1–21. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2959693
  114. Point, Check (2023). OPWNAI: Cybercriminals starting to use CHATGPT. Available at: https://research.checkpoint.com/2023/opwnai-cybercriminals-starting-to-usechatgpt/ (Accessed January 18, 2023).
  115. Qeios, "AI and Chatbot Trends in 2024," [Online]. Available: https://www.qeios.com/read/UE841K. Accessed: July 21, 2024.
  116. Qin, C., Zhang, A., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., Yasunaga, M., and Yang, D. (2023). Is ChatGPT a general-purpose natural language processing task solver? arXiv preprint
  117. Rahim, N. I. M., Iahad, N. A., Yusof, A. F., and Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2022). AI chatbots adoption model for higher-education institutions: a hybrid PLS-SEM-neural network modelling approach. Sustainability 14:12726. doi: 10.3390/su141912726
  118. Ramos-Pérez, E., Alonso-González, P., and Núñez-Velázquez, J. (2021). Multitransformer: a new neural network-based architecture for forecasting S&P Volatility. Math 9:1794. doi: 10.3390/math9151794
  119. Roose, K. (2022). The brilliance and weirdness of ChatGPT. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html (Accessed January 1, 2023).
  120. Ruipérez-Valiente, J., Muñoz-Merino, P., Alexandron, G., and Pritchard, D. (2017). Using machine learning to detect ‘multiple-account’ cheating and analyze the influence of student and problem features. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12, 112–122. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2017.2784420
  121. Ryan-Mosley, T. (2023). Five big takeaways from Europe’s AI act. MIT Technology Review. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/06/19/1075063/five-bigtakeaways-from-europes-ai-act/ (Accessed June 25, 2023).
  122. Sandu, N., and Gide, E. (2022). Adoption of AI-Chatbots to enhance student learning experience in higher education in India. IEEE Xplore. 2019 18th Int. Conf. On information technology based higher education and training (ITHET)
  123. Sangalli, V., Martinez-Muñoz, G., and Cañabate, E. (2020). “Identifying cheating users in online courses” in IEEE Xplore. 2020 IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON), 1168–1175.
  124. Shah, S. (2024) OpenAI reportedly plans to release GPT-5 this Summer, Evening Standard. Available at: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/tech/chatgpt-5-release-date-details-openai-chatbot-b1130369.html (Accessed: 06 March 2024).
  125. Shankland, S. (2022). Why Everyone’s obsessed with ChatGPT, a mind-blowing AI Chatbot. CNET. Available at: https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/why-everyonesobsessed-with-chatgpt-a-mind-blowing-ai-chatbot/ (Accessed January 1, 2023).
  126. Shorey, S., Ang, E., Yap, J., Ng, E., Lau, S., and Chui, C. (2019). A virtual counseling application using artificial intelligence for communication skills training in nursing education: development study. J. Med. Internet Res. 21:e14658. doi: 10.2196/14658
  127. Shrivastava, R. (2022). Teachers fear ChatGPT will make cheating easier than ever. Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rashishrivastava/2022/12/12/teachers-fear-chatgptwill-make-cheating-easier-than-ever/?sh=5b0ab2ac1eef (Accessed on January 2, 2023).
  128. Shuster, K., Poff, S., Chen, M., Kiela, D., and Weston, J. (2021). Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07567v1 [cs.CL]. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2104.07567
  129. Sinha, S., Basak, S., Dey, Y., and Mondal, A. (2020). An educational Chatbot for answering queries. In: J. Mandal and D. Bhattacharya (Eds) Emerging Technology in
  130. Slepankova, M. (2021). Possibilities of artificial intelligence in education: an assessment of the role of AI Chatbots as a communication medium in higher education (dissertation). Available at: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-108427 (Accessed January 1, 2023).
  131. Smith, C. (2023). GPT-5 might make ChatGPT indistinguishable from a human. BGR. Available at: https://bgr.com/tech/gpt-5-might-make-chatgpt-indistinguishable-froma-human/ (Accessed April 1, 2023).
  132. Sobania, D., Briesch, M., Hanna, C., and Petke, J. (2023). An analysis of the automatic bug fixing performance of ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.08653. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2301.08653.
  133. Soper, T. (2023). Seattle public schools bans ChatGPT; district ‘requires original thought and work from students’. GeekWire. Available at: https://www.geekwire. com/2023/seattle-public-schools-bans-chatgpt-district-requires-original-thought-andwork-from-students/ (Accessed January 1, 2023).
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

ChatGPT

Powered by PhDFocusTM