CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Mathematical Model for CBT Exam Malpractice Detection System (CEMDS)

by Franklin O. Okorodudu, Gracious C. Omede
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 186 - Number 21
Year of Publication: 2024
Authors: Franklin O. Okorodudu, Gracious C. Omede
10.5120/ijca2024923676

Franklin O. Okorodudu, Gracious C. Omede . Mathematical Model for CBT Exam Malpractice Detection System (CEMDS). International Journal of Computer Applications. 186, 21 ( May 2024), 1-3. DOI=10.5120/ijca2024923676

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2024923676,
author = { Franklin O. Okorodudu, Gracious C. Omede },
title = { Mathematical Model for CBT Exam Malpractice Detection System (CEMDS) },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2024 },
volume = { 186 },
number = { 21 },
month = { May },
year = { 2024 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-3 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume186/number21/mathematical-modelfor-cbt-exam-malpractice-detection-system-cemds/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2024923676 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-05-24T23:33:49.841548+05:30
%A Franklin O. Okorodudu
%A Gracious C. Omede
%T Mathematical Model for CBT Exam Malpractice Detection System (CEMDS)
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 186
%N 21
%P 1-3
%D 2024
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

As we know it now, technology has come a long way in transforming several aspects of people's lives, assisting in human efficiency and precision. Educators increasingly demand to investigate alternative methods of assessing pupils utilizing various mediums to assist students. Examination is the most common and commonly acknowledged method of assessing student aptitude and comprehension. Information and communication technology would have effectively achieved an error-free and efficient result during calculation when registering and conducting tests. However, there are specific problems in monitoring computer-based testing (CBT) examinations. One method in which wealth disparity reveals itself is Because of the enormous variety of systems utilized in CBT tests, examiners frequently regard space as a difficulty between students, making communication easier amongst students, and having fewer invigilators (examination supervisors) in larger exam halls makes handling this scenario difficult. A system can multitask using CBT-based exam monitoring tools; the same system used to write the test can also monitor the student utilizing it. It may be accomplished by automatically activating the system's webcam after a student has logged in for an exam.

References
  1. Zakka, J. (2014). Innovative strategies for curbing examination malpractices in public examinations in Nigeria. University of Nigeria. Unpublished M.Ed Thesis.
  2. Ayo, C. K., Akinyemi, I. O., Adebiyi, A. A., &Ekong, U. O. (2007). The prospects of e-examination implementation in Nigeria. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 5(4), 125-134.
  3. Shraim, K. (2019). Online Examination Practices in Higher Education Institutions: Learners' Perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 185-196.
  4. Sarrayrih, M. A., &Ilyas, M. (2013). Challenges of online exam, performances and problems for online university exam. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), 10(1), 439.
  5. Dreher C., Reiners T., &Dreher H. (2011). Investigating Factors Affecting the Uptake of Automated Assessment Technology. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 161–181.
  6. Baleni Z. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 228–236
  7. IsauAdewole A., Olugbenga A., Olusegun A., & Susan K. (2018). Students' Perception of Computer-Based Examinations: A Case Study of LadokeAkintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 23(5), 1–7.
  8. James, R. (2019). Tertiary student attitudes to invigilated, online summative examinations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 19.
  9. Hurd, M. (2020). Purpose of Exams. Edu – quip Blog. https://www.eduquip.co.uk/ blog/the-purpose-of-exams.
  10. Kotwal, D. V., Bhadke, S. R., Gunjal, A. S., & Biswas, P. (2016). Online examination system; international research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(1), 115-117.
  11. Hameed, M. R., & Abdullatif, F. A. (2017). Online examination system. International Advanced Research Journal in Science. Engineering and Technology, 4(3), 106-110.
  12. Rashad MZ, Kandil MS, Hassan AE, Zaher MA. An Arabic web-based exam management system. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Sciences. 2010; 10(1):35-41.
  13. Edono, K. P., (2016). ICTs for learning: An overview of systemic initiatives in the Australian states and territories.Australian Educational Computing, 17(2), 3-14.
  14. Franklin O. Okorodudu & Getty E. Izakpa (2023). ICT -TOOLS-BASED EXAMINATION MONITORING SYSTEM; THE DELTA STATE UNIVERSITY EXAMPLE. ciência e técnica vitivinícola journal ISSN: 2416-3953 38(1) pp 45-69
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences
Model for CBT monitoring

Keywords

CBT ICT Tools Examination Monitoring Detention Model

Powered by PhDFocusTM