CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Development of Administrative Processes Ontology: A Case Study of Postgraduate Education Domain

by Oluseyi Ayodeji Oyedeji, Ibiyinka Temilola Ayorinde
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 185 - Number 34
Year of Publication: 2023
Authors: Oluseyi Ayodeji Oyedeji, Ibiyinka Temilola Ayorinde
10.5120/ijca2023923119

Oluseyi Ayodeji Oyedeji, Ibiyinka Temilola Ayorinde . Development of Administrative Processes Ontology: A Case Study of Postgraduate Education Domain. International Journal of Computer Applications. 185, 34 ( Sep 2023), 23-30. DOI=10.5120/ijca2023923119

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2023923119,
author = { Oluseyi Ayodeji Oyedeji, Ibiyinka Temilola Ayorinde },
title = { Development of Administrative Processes Ontology: A Case Study of Postgraduate Education Domain },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Sep 2023 },
volume = { 185 },
number = { 34 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2023 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 23-30 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume185/number34/32910-2023923119/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2023923119 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:27:47.628974+05:30
%A Oluseyi Ayodeji Oyedeji
%A Ibiyinka Temilola Ayorinde
%T Development of Administrative Processes Ontology: A Case Study of Postgraduate Education Domain
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 185
%N 34
%P 23-30
%D 2023
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Administration is an important aspect of almost all organisations and directly impacts productivity and efficiency. Hence, applying ontology to administrative domain’s processes is essential. This research is focused on creating an administrative ontology and testing the correctness of its processes by using the Postgraduate College of the University of Ibadan as a case study. The domain knowledge was collected using data gathering techniques such as unstructured interview, direct observation, data from trusted sources, existing information system and literature review as a source of data. Relevant knowledge was extracted, refined, and eventually formalized using Description logics. The formalized knowledge was encoded into Web Ontology Language (OWL) format using Protege 5.5.0. The ontology was then tested with 50 competency questions for correctness with SPARQL and DL queries supported by ELK reasoner. Domain knowledge gathered consists of 207 facts, 70 constraints, 84 definitions and 305 initial concepts. 400 formalized expressions were produced from the formalization stage. An OWL file of 8047 lines was generated for the administrative ontology consisting of 1868 axioms (1203 logical axioms, 661 declaration axioms and 4 annotation axioms). The ontology output also consists of 347 classes, 182 Object properties, 28 data properties and 106 individuals. Finally, the competency questions and the answers exhibited 98% similarities when compared with the raw knowledge. This research provides a standardized and reusable knowledge structure for the administrative domain. It also sets the pace for extending the ontology to another peculiar administrative domain other than the Postgraduate College. Finally, the ontology developed can serve as knowledge base to be plugged into administrative applications.

References
  1. Alazemi, N., Al-Shehab, A. J., & Alhakem, H. A. (2018). SEMANTIC-BASED E-GOVERNMENT FRAMEWORK BASED ON DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES: A CASE OF KUWAIT REGION. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 15, 9. www.jatit.org
  2. Ayorinde, I. T. and Oyedeji, O. A. (2019). An Ontology for Intra-Campus Transport System (ICTS) (A Case Study of the University of Ibadan Campus). Journal of Digital Innovations and Contemp. Res. In Sc., Eng., & Tech. Vol. 7. No. 4: 65-78.
  3. Ayorinde, I. T. and Akinkunmi, B. O. (2019). Formalisation of Transition Between Occurrents in A Domain Ontology.
  4. Ayorinde, I. T. and Akinkunmi, B. O. (2013). A Dynamic Ontology for Shared Representation of Knowledge of Establishments. Journal of Science Research, Special Edition Vol. 12: 275- 283.
  5. Berners-Lee, Tim. Hendler, James & Lassila, Ora. (2001). The Semantic Web: A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Scientific American: Feature Article: The Semantic Web: May 2001
  6. Cascio, Wayne & Montealegre, Ramiro. (2016). How Technology Is Changing Work and Organisations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organisational Behavior. 3. 349- 375. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352.
  7. Chen, Z., Qian, H., Gao, Y., Lyu, H., & Wang, Q. (2022). Ontology Construction of City Hotline Service for Urban Grassroots Governance. 2022 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference, IEMTRONICS 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMTRONICS55184.2022.9795703
  8. Flotynski, J. (2020) Knowledge-based explorable extended reality environments. Knowledge-Based Explorable Extended Reality Environments, pp. 1-268.
  9. France-Mensah, J. and O'Brien, W.J. (2019) A shared ontology for integrated highway planning. Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 301 E. Dean Keeton Street, ECJ 5.412, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
  10. G S, Mahalakshmi & Geetha, T.V. (2009). An Indian logic-based argument representation formalism for knowledge-sharing. Logic Journal of the IGPL. 17. 55-76. 10.1093/jigpal/jzn026.
  11. Ovono Gerald and Moyo, S. (2023). Conceptual Linked Data Model for South African Municipalities Public Services Domain. In P. and P. Z. Silhavy Radek and Silhavy (Ed.), Data Science and Algorithms in Systems (pp. 197–208). Springer International Publishing.
  12. Giordano, L., Martelli, A., Dupré, D.T. (2021) Reasoning about actions with ontologies and temporal answer sets. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2970,
  13. Grau, Bernardo Cuenca. Parsia, Bijan and Sirin, Evren. (2004). Working with Multiple Ontologies on the Semantic Web.
  14. Guarino Nicola and Giaretta Pierdaniele. (1995). Ontology and knowledge bases towards a terminological clarification, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu.
  15. Héctor E. Ugarte R (2017) A more pragmatic Web 3.0: Linked Blockchain Data [“SEMANTIC BLOCKCHAIN” - STARTING POINT] Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn – Germany
  16. Jiang, Y. (2020) Semantically enhanced information retrieval using multiple knowledge sources. Cluster Computing, 23 (4), pp. 2925-2944.
  17. Kakad, S., & Dhage, S. (2021). Building alumni ontology to bridge industry-institute gap using protégé 5.5. 2021 2nd International Conference for Emerging Technology, INCET 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/INCET51464.2021.9456325
  18. Kakad, S., & Dhage, S. (2022). Semantic Web: Knowledge Graph of Digital Minimalism Ontology. 2022 3rd International Conference for Emerging Technology, INCET 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/INCET54531.2022.9824657
  19. Kakad, S., Dhage, S., (2022) Knowledge graph and semantic web model for cross domain. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 100 (16), pp. 5202-5218.
  20. Kaur, N., Aggarwal H., (2020) Query reformulation approach using domain specific ontology for semantic information retrieval. Bharati Vidyapeeth’s Institute of Computer Applications and Management 2020. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 13(5):1745–1753.
  21. Khamparia, A., Pandey, B. (2017)Comprehensive analysis of semantic web reasoners and tools: a survey Education and Information Technologies, 22 (6), pp. 3121-3145.
  22. Kumar Anand , Dwivedi Sanjay K. (2015). Ontology based Knowledge Management for Administrative Processes of University. I.J. Information Technology and Computer Science, 2015, 08, 51-60. DOI: 10.5815/ijitcs.2015.08.08
  23. Mgunda, Moses. (2019). The Impacts Information Technology on Business. 10.32535/jicp.v2i3.656.
  24. Moudoubah, L., Yamami, A.E., Mansouri, K., Qbadou, M., (2021) Development of Ontology for Semantic Structure of Strategic Alignment Framework for IT Projects Combining PMBOK, PMI and VAL IT. Signals, distributed systems, and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, ENSET Mohammedia, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco.
  25. Munoz, A., Mart, L., and Sanchez-Pi, N. (2021) Data Governance, a Knowledge Model Through Ontologies. Inria Chile Research Center, Av. Apoquindo 2827, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
  26. Nandhinidevi, S., Saraswathi, K., Thangamani, M., Ganthimathi, M. (2021) Design and development of bird ontology using protégé Materials Today: Proceedings.
  27. Noy N.F. and McGuiness D.L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology, Stanford knowledge systems laboratory technical report KS_01_05.
  28. Radhika, P., Suresh Varm, P., Lakshmi Kalyani, N., Rama Krishna, P., Santosh Kumar, M. (2019) Representation of knowledge through ontology for swine flu disease in semiarid tropical regions. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 10 (3), pp. 172-176
  29. Schreiber, Guus & Aroyo, Lora. (2008). Principles for Knowledge Engineering on the Web. 78-82. Symbiotic Relationships between Semantic Web and Knowledge Engineering, Papers from the 2008 AAAI Spring Symposium, Technical Report SS-08-07, Stanford, California, USA, March 26-28, 2008
  30. Schulze, Michael. Schroder, Markus. Jilek, Christian. Albers, Torsten. Maus, Heiko and Dengel, Andreas. (2021). P2P-O: A Purchase-To-Pay Ontology for Enabling Semantic Invoices.
  31. Wang, Z., Song, Z., Yu, G., & Wang, X. (2021). An Ontology for Chinese Government Archives Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. IEEE Access, 9, 130199–130211. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112001
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Digital administration Ontology Protégé Web ontology language (owl).

Powered by PhDFocusTM