CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Long-Range Wide Area Network (LoRa-WAN) Connectivity and Range Evaluation in a Rural Setting

by Nahshon Mokua Obiri, Humphry Shikunzi
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 185 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2023
Authors: Nahshon Mokua Obiri, Humphry Shikunzi
10.5120/ijca2023922699

Nahshon Mokua Obiri, Humphry Shikunzi . Long-Range Wide Area Network (LoRa-WAN) Connectivity and Range Evaluation in a Rural Setting. International Journal of Computer Applications. 185, 3 ( Apr 2023), 61-67. DOI=10.5120/ijca2023922699

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2023922699,
author = { Nahshon Mokua Obiri, Humphry Shikunzi },
title = { Long-Range Wide Area Network (LoRa-WAN) Connectivity and Range Evaluation in a Rural Setting },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Apr 2023 },
volume = { 185 },
number = { 3 },
month = { Apr },
year = { 2023 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 61-67 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume185/number3/32689-2023922699/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2023922699 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:25:12.741376+05:30
%A Nahshon Mokua Obiri
%A Humphry Shikunzi
%T Long-Range Wide Area Network (LoRa-WAN) Connectivity and Range Evaluation in a Rural Setting
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 185
%N 3
%P 61-67
%D 2023
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is expanding rapidly, with many applications requiring low-power, and long-range connectivity. One of the popular technologies for the IoT is Low-Power Wide-Area Networks (LPWAN), specifically LoRa, which promises to provide connectivity to remote and rural areas. However, the performance of LoRa in such areas remains poorly understood. In this study, the connectivity and range evaluation of LoRa networks were performed in a rural setting. The objective was to understand the coverage, reliability, and connectivity of LoRa in real-world conditions and compare the results with the advertised performance of this technology. The findings of this study provided valuable insights into the suitability of LoRa for IoT applications in rural areas and guide to design decisions for IoT networks. The experimental setup involved battery-powered mobile stations (nodes) mounted on top of 2.5m tall stands and transmitting data to a base station (gateway) installed on top of a 25m high building. The wireless channel characteristics utilized were the Signal-to-noise Ratio (SNR) and Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) metrics, across eight test locations. To estimate connectivity and range of operation within the 868 MHz ISM band, the collected findings were utilized to establish a relationship model in an area comparable to the selected research station.

References
  1. W. San-Um, P. Lekbunyasin, M. Kodyoo, W. Wongsuwan, J. Makfak and J. Kerdsri, “A long-range low-power wireless sensor network based on U-LoRa technology for tactical troops tracking systems,” in 2017 Third Asian Conference on Defence Technology (ACDT), Phuket, Thailand, 2017.
  2. P. Sommer, Y. Maret and D. Dzung, “Low-Power Wide-Area Networks for Industrial Sensing Applications,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Internet (ICII), Seattle, WA, USA, 2018.
  3. Shahjalal, K. Hasan, M. Islam, M. Alam, F. Ahmed and Y. M. Jang, “An Overview of AI-Enabled Remote Smart- Home Monitoring System Using LoRa,” in 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC), Fukuoka, Japan, 2020.
  4. M. Centenaro, L. Vangelista, A. Zanella and M. Zorzi, “Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: the rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 60-67, 2016.
  5. Z. Qihao, Z. Kan, H. Lu, X. Jinyu and X. Rongtao, “Design and Implementation of Open LoRa for IoT,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 100649-100657, 2019.
  6. R. Kir, “Long-Range Data Transmission on Flying Ubiquitous Sensor Networks (FUSN) by Using LPWAN Protocols,” in International Conference on Distributed Computer and Communication Networks, 2017.
  7. Y. Chung, J. Y. Ahn and J. D. Huh, “Experiments of A LPWAN Tracking(TR) Platform Based on Sigfox Test Network,” in 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju; South Korea, 2018.
  8. D. M. Hernandez, G. Peralta, L. Manero, R. Gomez, J. Bilbao and C. Zubia, “Energy and coverage study of LPWAN schemes for Industry 4.0,” in 2017 IEEE International Workshop of Electronics, Control, Measurement, Signals and their Application to Mechatronics (ECMSM), Donostia, Spain, 2017.
  9. P. Ryckebusch, S. Giannoulis, I. Moerman, J. Hoebeke and E. D. Poorter, “Modelling the energy consumption for over-the-air software updates in LPWAN networks: SigFox, LoRa and IEEE 802.15.4g,” Internet of Things , pp. 104-119, October 2018.
  10. K. Nolan, W. Guibene and M. Kelly, “An evaluation of low power wide area network technologies for the Internet of Things,” in 2016 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Paphos, Cyprus, 2016.
  11. D. H. Kim, J. Y. Lim and J. D. Kim, “Low-Power, Long-Range, High-Data Transmission Using Wi-Fi and LoRa,” in 2016 6th International Conference on IT Convergence and Security (ICITCS), Prague, Czech Republic , 2016.
  12. A. J. Wixted, P. Kinnaird, H. Larijani, A. Tait, A. Ahmadinia and N. Strachan, “Evaluation of LoRa and LoRaWAN for wireless sensor networks,” in 2016 IEEE SENSORS, Orlando, FL, USA, 2016.
  13. L. Leonardi, F. Battaglia, G. Patti and L. L. Bello, “Industrial LoRa: A Novel Medium Access Strategy for LoRa in Industry 4.0 Applications,” in IECON 2018 - 44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
  14. L. Leonardi, L. L. Bello, F. Battaglia and G. Patti, “Comparative Assessment of the LoRaWAN Medium Access Control Protocols for IoT: Does Listen before Talk Perform Better than ALOHA?,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 4, 4 March 2020.
  15. J. d. C. Silva, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, A. M. Alberti, P. Solic and A. L. L. Aquino, “LoRaWAN — A low power WAN protocol for Internet of Things: A review and opportunities,” in 2017 2nd International Multidisciplinary Conference on Computer and Energy Science (SpliTech), Split, Croatia, 2017.
  16. Q. Yu, H. Wang and Z. Lu, “Group-Based CSS Modulation: A Novel Enhancement to LoRa Physical Layer,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 660-664, 2022.
  17. R. P. Centelles, F. Freitag, R. Meseguer and L. Navarro, “Beyond the Star of Stars: An Introduction to Multi-hop and Mesh for LoRa and LoRaWAN,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 63-72, 2021.
  18. D. Eridani, E. D. Widianto, R. D. O. Augustinus and A. A. Faizal, “Monitoring System in Lora Network Architecture using Smart Gateway in Simple LoRa Protocol,” in 2019 International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2019.
  19. H. Huh and J. Y. Kim, “LoRa-based Mesh Network for IoT Applications,” in 2019 IEEE 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Limerick, Ireland , 2019.
  20. L. M. Figueiredo and E. F. Silva, “Cognitive-LoRa: adaptation-aware of the physical layer in LoRa-based networks,” in 2020 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Rennes, France, 2020.
  21. A. Augustin, J. Yi, T. Clausen and W. M. Townsley, “A Study of LoRa: Long Range & Low Power Networks for the Internet of Things,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 9, p. 1466, 2016.
  22. T. T. Nguyen, H. H. Nguyen, R. Barton and P. Grossetete, “Efficient Design of Chirp Spread Spectrum Modulation for Low-Power Wide-Area Networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 9503-9515, 2019.
  23. K. Robert, R. Pall and M. Timothy J, “Definition of signal-to-noise ratio and its critical role in split-beam measurements,” ICES Journal of Marine Science,, vol. 62, no. 1, p. 123–130, 2005.
  24. H. S. Muhammad and A. Yousef, “Signal-to-Noise Ratio Comparison of Several Filters against Phantom Image,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2022, 2022.
  25. S. Farahani, “ZigBee Wireless Networks and Transceivers,” in Location Estimation Methods, Newnes, 2008, pp. 225-246.
  26. K. Gagandeep, H. G. Sindhu and K. Harleen, “Optimizing the LoRa network performance for industrial scenario using a machine learning approach,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol. 100, 2022.
  27. “Sigfox.com,” Sigfox - The Global Communications Service Provider for the Internet of Things (IoT), [Online]. Available: http://www.sigfox.com/en/. [Accessed 01 November 2019].
  28. “Lora-alliance.org,” Home page | LoRa Alliance™, [Online]. Available: https://www.lora-alliance.org/. [Accessed 02 November 2019].
  29. “Weightless.org,” Weightless - Setting the Standard for IoT, [Online]. Available: http://www.weightless.org/. [Accessed 02 November 2019].
  30. “GSA,” Nokia - LTE M2M: Optimizing LTE for the Internet of Things - GSA, [Online]. Available: https://gsacom.com/paper/nokia-lte-m2m-optimizing-lte-for-the-internet-of-things/. [Accessed 03 November 2019].
  31. S. Andreevy, O. Galinina, A. Pyattaev, M. Gerasimenko, T. Tirronen, J. Torsner, J. Sachs, M. Dohler and Y. Koucheryavy, “Understanding the IoT connectivity landscape: a contemporary M2M radio technology roadmap,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 32-40, 2015.
  32. A. Berni and W. Gregg, “On the Utility of Chirp Modulation for Digital Signaling,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 748-751, 1973.
  33. A. Springer, W. Gugler, M. Huemer, L. Reindl, C. C. W. Ruppel and R. Weigel, “A wireless spread-spectrum communication system using SAW chirped delay lines,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 754-760, 2001.
  34. J. Petäjäjärvi, K. Mikhaylov, A. Roivainen, T. Hänninen and M. Pettissalo, “On the coverage of LPWANs: Range evaluation and channel attenuation model for LoRa technology,” in 2015 14th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST), 2016.
  35. “Lora-alliance.org,” What is LoRaWAN® | LoRa Alliance™, [Online]. Available: https://lora-alliance.org/resource-hub/what-lorawanr. [Accessed 05 November 2019].
  36. “Revspace.nl,” DecodingLora - RevSpace, [Online]. Available: https://revspace.nl/DecodingLora. [Accessed 03 November 2019].
  37. N. Rathod, P. Jain, R. Subramanian, S. Yawalkar and M. Sunkenapally, “Performance Analysis of Wireless Devices for a Campus-wide IoT Network,” in The 2015 International Workshop on Wireless Network Measurements and Experimentation, 2015.
  38. “The Things Network,” MultiTech Conduit, [Online]. Available: https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/docs/gateways/multitech/. [Accessed 13 September 2019].
  39. “STMicroelectronics,” STM32 Nucleo Boards - STMicroelectronics, [Online]. Available: https://www.st.com/en/evaluation-tools/stm32-nucleo-boards.html. [Accessed 22 August 2019].
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

IoT LPWANs WSNs LoRa LoRa-WAN connectivity range RSSI SNR