CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Novel Mobile-based Assessment Application for Evaluating Students' Creative Artworks in Higher Education

by W.K. ElSaid
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 185 - Number 20
Year of Publication: 2023
Authors: W.K. ElSaid
10.5120/ijca2023922920

W.K. ElSaid . A Novel Mobile-based Assessment Application for Evaluating Students' Creative Artworks in Higher Education. International Journal of Computer Applications. 185, 20 ( Jul 2023), 22-31. DOI=10.5120/ijca2023922920

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2023922920,
author = { W.K. ElSaid },
title = { A Novel Mobile-based Assessment Application for Evaluating Students' Creative Artworks in Higher Education },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jul 2023 },
volume = { 185 },
number = { 20 },
month = { Jul },
year = { 2023 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 22-31 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume185/number20/32809-2023922920/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2023922920 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:26:35.452105+05:30
%A W.K. ElSaid
%T A Novel Mobile-based Assessment Application for Evaluating Students' Creative Artworks in Higher Education
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 185
%N 20
%P 22-31
%D 2023
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Over the years, the human evaluation of students' creative artwork has been a thorny issue in creativity research, as the value of student's creative artwork varies from one art expert to another. Therefore, it was necessary, in the digital age, to employ modern technologies to limit human interference in assessing creative artworks of students in a way achieves objectivity, credibility and also maintains the creative and innovative aspect of the artwork. This paper proposes a semi-automated mobile App for assessing students' creative artworks in Egyptian institutions of higher education. The proposed mobile-based artworks assessment app integrates the content analysis approach and views of art experts. The content analysis approach is used to calculate the affinity scores of the student's artistic design with the desired art model and represents 70 percent of the total course score. The art expert opinions are used to calculate the creativity of the student's artistic design and represents 30 percent of the total course score. In two planned stages, the process of evaluating the performance of the proposed mobile-based artworks assessment App was performed. In the first stage, the usability of the proposed mobile-based artworks assessment App was tested, and the findings of this stage were very satisfactory.On other hand, in the second stage, the accuracy of the proposed mobile-based artworks assessment App in assessing students' creative artworks was measured, and the outcomes of this stage revealed that the proposal App achieved an outstanding accuracy above our expectations, making it one of the first digital applications to assess students' art designs in an informed and fair manner.

References
  1. Rusu, M. 2017.Emotional development through art expressions. Review of artistic education. (13+ 14). 227-238.
  2. Noy, P., & Noy-Sharav. D.2013.Art and emotions. International journal of applied psychoanalytic studies. 10(2). 100-107.
  3. Jacquette, D.2014.Art, expression, perception and intentionality. Journal of aesthetics and phenomenology. 1(1). 63-90.
  4. Binder, R. M.1904. Art, Religion, and the emotions. The American journal of theology. 8(4). 636-657.
  5. Chemi, T., & Jensen, J. B.2015.Emotions and learning in arts-based practices of educational innovation. In dealing with emotions. Brill. 21-36.
  6. Le, T.H.D.2015.Art in relationships with human consciousness and unconsciousness. Collection of articles of the conference. Art therapy in preschool education. 24-30.
  7. Stuckey, H. L., & Nobel, J.2010. The connection between art, healing, and public health: A review of current literature. American journal of public health. 100(2), 254-263.
  8. Melchionne, K.2017. Art and well-being. Estetika: The European journal of aesthetics. 54(2). 189-211.
  9. Graham, G. 2005. Philosophy of the arts: An introduction to aesthetics. 3rd ed. Routledge.
  10. Tuman, L. 1992. The spiritual role of art. The journal of bahá’í studies. 4(4). 59-84.
  11. Çetin, Z. 2021. The effect of a modular art education programme on the personal-social development of preschool children. South African journal of childhood education. 11(1). 1-7.
  12. Wang, M. 2022. Analyzing the influence of college aesthetic education teaching on college students’ innovation ability and artistic literacy based on decision tree classification model. Mobile information systems. (2022). 1-12.
  13. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)/Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. 2008. Assessment for learning: formative assessment. In paper presented at the OECD/CERI international conference learning in the 21st century: Research, innovation and policy. Paris. France: OECD publishing.1-24.
  14. Boughton, D. 2013. Assessment of performance in the visual arts: What, how and why?. Kárpáti andrea és gaul emil (szerk.): From child art to visual language of youth.-new models and tools for assessment of learning and creation in art education. Intellect publishers. Bristol. 119-142.
  15. Zabulis, X., & Orphanoudakis, S. C. 2001. Image content analysis and description. State-of-the-art in content-based image and video retrieval. Kluwer academic publishers. 1-19.
  16. Chiu, M. C., Hwang, G. J., & Hsia, L. H. 2023. Promoting students' artwork appreciation: An experiential learning-based virtual reality approach. British journal of educational technology.54(2). 603-621.
  17. Tam, C. O. 2018. Evaluating students’ performance in responding to art: The development and validation of an art criticism assessment rubric. International journal of art & design education. 37(3). 519-529.
  18. Abildinova, G. M., Alzhanov, A. K., Ospanova, N. N., Taybaldieva, Z., Baigojanova, D. S., & Pashovkin, N. O. 2016. Developing a mobile application" educational process remote management system" on the android operating system. International journal of environmental and science education. 11(12). 5128-5145.
  19. Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Alhajri, R. A., & Al-Sharhan, S. 2018. Perceptions and challenges of mobile learning in Kuwait. Journal of King Saud university-computer and information sciences. 30(2). 279-289.
  20. Goundar, S. 2011. What is the potential impact of using mobile devices in education?. Proceedings of SIG GlobDev fourth annual workshop. Shanghai. China.1-32.
  21. Mohammadi, M., Sarvestani, M. S., & Nouroozi, S. 2020. Mobile phone use in education and learning by faculty members of technical-engineering groups: Concurrent mixed methods design.5(16). Frontiers Media SA. 1-9.
  22. Orr, S., & Bloxham, S. 2013. Making judgements about students making work: Lecturers’ assessment practices in art and design. Arts and humanities in higher education. 12(2-3). 234-253.
  23. Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. 2015. An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices. Computers & Education. 85. 149-159.
  24. Tam, C.O. 2018. Evaluating students’ performance in responding to art: The Development and validation of an art criticism assessment rubric. International journal of art & design education. 37(3). 519-529.
  25. Graham, M. 2019. Assessment in the visual arts: Challenges and possibilities. Arts education policy review. 120(3). 175-183.
  26. Häikiö, T. K. 2021. Potentials and problem areas in assessment in visual arts education in Sweden. Educare. (2). 68-112.
  27. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing. 62(1). 107-115.
  28. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research. 15(9).1277-1288.
  29. Prasad, B. D. 2018. Content analysis. A method in social science research. 1-20.
  30. Gheyle, N., & Jacobs, T. 2017. Content analysis: A short overview. Internal research note. 1-17.
  31. Mihailescu, M. 2019. Content analysis: A digital method.The university of Warwick. 1-21.
  32. Krippendorff, K. 1980. Validity in content analysis. In E. Mochmann (Ed.). Computerstrategien fأ¼r die kommunikationsanalyse. Frankfurt. Germany: Campus.69-112
  33. https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/research/population-health-methods/content-analysis
  34. Bengtsson, M. 2016. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus open. (2). 8-14.
  35. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/content-analysis/.
  36. https://www.clootrack.com/knowledge_base/what-are-the-steps-of-content-analysis#:~:text=The%20seven%20major%20elements%20that,for%20the%20intended%20content%20analysis.
  37. White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. 2006. Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends. 55(1). 22-45.
  38. Center, G.L.2013. Content analysis: Principles and practices. US accountability office.1-61.
  39. Reichenbach, K. 2014. Using content analysis to examine the relationship between commercial and nonprofit organizations' motives and consumer engagement on Facebook. University of missouri-columbia. 1-43.
  40. https://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=61
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Artworks Evaluation Content Analysis Art Experts Semi-Automated Android Application Validity Test Accuracy Test

Powered by PhDFocusTM