CFP last date
20 August 2024
Reseach Article

Perceived usability of Arabic System Usability Scale (A-SUS) of Microsoft Teams within Faculty Members

by Manal Alsuwaidi
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 185 - Number 20
Year of Publication: 2023
Authors: Manal Alsuwaidi
10.5120/ijca2023922845

Manal Alsuwaidi . Perceived usability of Arabic System Usability Scale (A-SUS) of Microsoft Teams within Faculty Members. International Journal of Computer Applications. 185, 20 ( Jul 2023), 8-13. DOI=10.5120/ijca2023922845

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2023922845,
author = { Manal Alsuwaidi },
title = { Perceived usability of Arabic System Usability Scale (A-SUS) of Microsoft Teams within Faculty Members },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jul 2023 },
volume = { 185 },
number = { 20 },
month = { Jul },
year = { 2023 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 8-13 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume185/number20/32806-2023922845/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2023922845 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:26:33.322058+05:30
%A Manal Alsuwaidi
%T Perceived usability of Arabic System Usability Scale (A-SUS) of Microsoft Teams within Faculty Members
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 185
%N 20
%P 8-13
%D 2023
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Computer and mobile applications (apps) were more beneficial for education and applied skills services during COVID-19. There are questions about both theoretical comprehension and actual application regarding how successfully these apps may be used, particularly in languages like Arabic. In order to understand faculty members' opinions on utilizing Microsoft Teams in the departments of basic education, business studies, technological studies, and administrative services, this study uses the Arabic System Usability Scale (A-SUS) survey in Kuwait. According to the A-SUS data, the business and technological faculties are relatively more useful. A master's degree is more common among academics who are between the ages of 30 and 39 in particular. To investigate the present theoretical complaint of the factoring structure of SUS, the data is further compressed into two composite components, usability and learnability. The data theory of SUS in general and A-SUS in particular is supported by these findings, which is important from the faculty's point of view because it considers A-SUS a crucial part of learning management software.

References
  1. Anie, S. O. (2011). The economic and social benefits of ICT policies in Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1, 125.
  2. Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24.
  3. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1–20.
  4. Nuere, S., & de Miguel, L. (2020). The Digital/Technological Connection with COVID-19: An Unprecedented Challenge in University Teaching. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–13.
  5. Blair, I. (2020). Mobile App Download and Usage Statistics (2020). https://buildfire.com/app-statistics/
  6. Gao, M., Kortum, P., & Oswald, F. L. (2020). Multi-Language Toolkit for the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1801173
  7. Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2017). Revisiting the Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 12(4), 183–192.
  8. De Angeli, A., Athavankar, U., Joshi, A., Coventry, L., & Johnson, G. I. (2004). Introducing ATMs in India: a contextual inquiry. Interacting with Computers, 16(1), 29–44.
  9. Frandsen-Thorlacius, O., Hornbæk, K., Hertzum, M., & Clemmensen, T. (2009). Non-universal usability? A survey of how usability is understood by Chinese and Danish users. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 41–50.
  10. Hsieh, H. C. L. (2011). Exploring the impact of cultures on web usability test. International Conference on Human Centered Design, 47–54.
  11. Jonsson, O., Haak, M., Tomsone, S., Iwarsson, S., Schmidt, S. M., Mårtensson, K., Svensson, T., & Slaug, B. (2016). Cross-National Usability Study of a Housing Accessibility App: Findings From the European InnovAge Project. Journal of Usability Studies, 12(1).
  12. Mol, M., Van Schaik, A., Dozeman, E., Ruwaard, J., Vis, C., Ebert, D. D., Etzelmueller, A., Mathiasen, K., Moles, B., Mora, T., Pedersen, C. D., Skjøth, M. M., Pensado, L. P., Piera-Jimenez, J., Gokcay, D., Ince, B. Ü., Russi, A., Sacco, Y., Zanalda, E., … Smit, J. H. (2020). Dimensionality of the system usability scale among professionals using internet-based interventions for depression: A confirmatory factor analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02627-8
  13. Walsh, T., Nurkka, P., & Walsh, R. (2010). Cultural differences in smartphone user experience evaluation. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, 1–9.
  14. AlGhannam, B. A. (2018). Perceived Usability Using Arabic System Usability Scale ( A-SUS ): Student Perspective of Smart PAAET App. International Journal of Computer Science and InformationSecurity, 16(7), 66–78.
  15. AlGhannam, B. A., Albustan, S. A., Al-Hassan, A. A., & Albustan, L. A. (2018). Towards a Standard Arabic System Usability Scale: Psychometric Evaluation using Communication Disorder App. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(9), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1388099
  16. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty’usability. In Usability evaluation in industry (p. 189). CRC press.
  17. Lewis, J. R., Utesch, B. S., & Maher, D. E. (2015). Measuring Perceived Usability: The SUS, UMUX-LITE, and AltUsability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(8), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1064654
  18. Brajnik, G. (2000). Automatic web usability evaluation: what needs to be done. Proc. Human Factors and the Web, 6th Conference. http://users.dimi.uniud.it/~giorgio.brajnik/papers/hfweb00.html
  19. Brooke, J. (2018). System usability scale (SUS). Iron and Steel Technology. https://doi.org/10.5948/upo9781614440260.011.
  20. Al Ghurair, N., & Alnaqi, G. (2020). Schemes of eStories for Children with Social Communication Difficulties. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9530218
  21. Binyamin, S., Rutter, M., & Smith, S. (2016). the Utilization of System Usability Scale in Learning Management Systems: a Case Study of Jeddah Community College. ICERI2016 Proceedings, 1, 5314–5323. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.2290
  22. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., & Norman, K. L. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 213–218.
  23. Drew, M. R., Falcone, B., & Baccus, W. L. (2018). What does the system usability scale (SUS) measure? International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, 356–366.
  24. Finstad, K. (2006). The system usability scale and non-native English speakers. Journal of Usability Studies, 1(4), 185–188.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Arabic Applications Usability Microsoft Teams Education Training.