CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Case Study of the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Aid in the Clinical Detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in Sow Farms

by Benjamin W. Blair, Sasidhar Malladi, James F. Lowe
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 184 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2022
Authors: Benjamin W. Blair, Sasidhar Malladi, James F. Lowe
10.5120/ijca2022922061

Benjamin W. Blair, Sasidhar Malladi, James F. Lowe . A Case Study of the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Aid in the Clinical Detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in Sow Farms. International Journal of Computer Applications. 184, 9 ( Apr 2022), 13-20. DOI=10.5120/ijca2022922061

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2022922061,
author = { Benjamin W. Blair, Sasidhar Malladi, James F. Lowe },
title = { A Case Study of the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Aid in the Clinical Detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in Sow Farms },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Apr 2022 },
volume = { 184 },
number = { 9 },
month = { Apr },
year = { 2022 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 13-20 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume184/number9/32356-2022922061/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2022922061 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:21:02.206299+05:30
%A Benjamin W. Blair
%A Sasidhar Malladi
%A James F. Lowe
%T A Case Study of the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Aid in the Clinical Detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in Sow Farms
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 184
%N 9
%P 13-20
%D 2022
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The introduction of a pathogen into a livestock population is the cause devastating losses in swine farms. The early detection of disease plays an essential role in limiting the effects of a pathogen introduction on a population. While the use of routine lab-based molecular testing for antigens can aid in rapid pathogen detection, the number of samples statistically required, and the associated expense make its frequent use unrealistic. For these reasons, researchers continue to develop additional tools to aid in disease detection. This project proposes a predictive tool that overcomes the limitations of inherent biological variation by utilizing current machine learning advancements to detect disease quickly and accurately within a population. The early identification of a pathogen on a sow farm facilitates timely management decisions to slow pathogen transmission and reduce the severity of disease. Producers’ decisions encompass a broad range of tactics to limit spread through the feed, people, supply, or animal movements. Prompt implementation of these tactics is essential for minimizing both the individual producer's and the industry's short- and long-term financial losses. Described is a tool that facilities sensitive syndromic surveillance for sow farms by applying machine learning to historical individual sow production records to predict of the outcome of an individual breeding event. The tool predicts which sow breeding events will yield piglets (farrow) and subsequently monitors the outcome of the breeding event. If more services result in failure than expected, as defined by the model's error, the model signals a disruption (presence of disease). To compare the sensitivity of the tool to the established Statistical process control approach (SPC), retrospective data from two sow farms that experienced a Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) introduction were assessed. While both the machine learning based tool and SPC detected PRRSv introduction on each farm, the average detection was 1 and 3 weeks before the farm reported a disease event using the novel machine learning-based method and 2 weeks after and 1 week before using SPC. In addition to identifying the PRRSv introduction, the machine learning approach identified production disruption resulting from changes to the electronic sow feeding system on the farm. SPC failed to identify this disruption. These two test cases demonstrate that the novel machine learning-based method maybe more sensitive for the surveillance of swine farms for pathogen and non-pathogen related disruptions to average production compared to previously described SPC based approach. The machine learning based technique is broadly applicable to economically important diseases, and most importantly can serve as an early alert for novel pathogens where industry level monitoring is not conducted routinely.

References
  1. M. McLaws and C. Ribble, “Description of recent foot and mouth disease outbreaks in nonendemic areas: Exploring the relationship between early detection and epidemic size,” vol. 48, p. 12, 1994.
  2. J. A. Backer, H. Brouwer, G. van Schaik, and H. J. W. van Roermund, “Using mortality data for early detection of Classical Swine Fever in The Netherlands,” Prev. Vet. Med., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 38–47, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.10.008.
  3. C. Herholz, T. Jemmi, K. Stärk, and C. Griot, “Patterns of animal diseases and their control,” Vet Ital, vol. 42, p. 9, 2006.
  4. S. Dorjee, C. W. Revie, Z. Poljak, W. B. McNab, and J. Sanchez, “Network analysis of swine shipments in Ontario, Canada, to support disease spread modelling and risk-based disease management,” Prev. Vet. Med., vol. 112, no. 1–2, pp. 118–127, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.06.008.
  5. D. J. Holtkamp et al., “Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on United States pork ­producers,” J. Swine Health Prod., vol. 21, no. 2, p. 13, 2013.
  6. V. R. Brown et al., “Risks of introduction and economic consequences associated with African swine fever, classical swine fever and foot‐and‐mouth disease: A review of the literature,” Transbound. Emerg. Dis., vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1910–1965, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1111/tbed.13919.
  7. P. L. Paarlberg and A. H. Seitzinger, “Economic Impacts of Foreign Animal Disease,” p. 80.
  8. J. Richt and R. Webby, Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology Volume 370: Swine Influenza. 2013.
  9. A. R. W. Elbers, A. Stegeman, H. Moser, H. M. Ekker, J. A. Smak, and F. H. Pluimers, “The classical swine fever epidemic 1997–1998 in the Netherlands: descriptive epidemiology,” Prev. Vet. Med., vol. 42, no. 3–4, pp. 157–184, Dec. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(99)00074-4.
  10. J. Fritzemeier, “Epidemiology of classical swine fever in Germany in the 1990s,” Vet. Microbiol., vol. 77, no. 1–2, pp. 29–41, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00254-6.
  11. W. H. Woodall, “Controversies and Contradictions in Statistical Process Control,” J. Qual. Technol., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 341–350, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1080/00224065.2000.11980013.
  12. A. De Vries and J. K. Reneau, “Application of statistical process control charts to monitor changes in animal production systems1,” J. Anim. Sci., vol. 88, no. suppl_13, pp. E11–E24, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2622.
  13. G. S. Silva, M. Schwartz, R. B. Morrison, and D. C. L. Linhares, “Monitoring breeding herd production data to detect PRRSV outbreaks,” Prev. Vet. Med., vol. 148, pp. 89–93, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.10.012.
  14. T. N. Madsen and A. R. Kristensen, “A model for monitoring the condition of young pigs by their drinking behaviour,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 48, no.2,pp.138–154,Aug.2005,doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2005.02.014.
  15. D. Michie, “‘Memo’ Functions and Machine Learning,” Nature, Vol. 218, p. 4, 1968.
  16. R. C. Deo, “Machine Learning in Medicine,” AHA Journal, p. 11., 2015
  17. I. Díaz, S. M. Mazza, E. F. Combarro, L. I. Giménez, and J. E. Gaiad, “Machine learning applied to the prediction of citrus production,” Span. J. Agric. Res., vol. 15, no. 2, p. e0205, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.5424/sjar/2017152-9090.
  18. Md. T. Shakoor, K. Rahman, S. N. Rayta, and A.Chakrabarty, “Agricultural production output prediction using Supervised Machine Learning techniques,” in 2017 1st International Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications (NextComp), Mauritius,Jul.2017,pp.182–187.doi: 10.1109/NEXTCOMP.2017.8016196.
  19. M. J. Diamantopoulou, R. Özçelik, and H. Yavuz, “Tree-bark volume prediction via machine learning: A case study based on black alder’s tree-bark production,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 151, pp. 431–440, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.039.
  20. M. Fischetti and M. Fraccaro, “Machine learning meets mathematical optimization to predict the optimal production of offshore wind parks,” Comput. Oper. Res., vol. 106, pp. 289–297, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2018.04.006.
  21. Hang Li, “An approach to improve flexible manufacturing systems with machine learning algorithms,” in IECON 2016 - 42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Florence, Italy,Oct.2016,pp.54–59.doi: 10.1109/IECON.2016.7793838.
  22. B. Meredig, “Industrial materials informatics: Analyzing large-scale data to solve applied problems in R&D, manufacturing, and supply chain,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 159–166, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2017.01.003.
  23. P. Ci̇Han, E. Gökçe, and O. Kalipsiz, “Veterinerlik Alanında Makine Öğrenmesi Uygulamaları Üzerine Bir Derleme,” Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 2017, doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2016.17281.
  24. M. R. Borchers, Y. M. Chang, K. L. Proudfoot, B. A. Wadsworth, A. E. Stone, and J. M. Bewley, “Machine-learning-based calving prediction from activity, lying, and ruminating behaviors in dairy cattle,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 5664–5674, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11526.
  25. S. Higaki et al., “Estrous detection by continuous measurements of vaginal temperature and conductivity with supervised machine learning in cattle,” Theriogenology, vol. 123, pp. 90–99, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.09.038.
  26. I. R. Morales, D. R. Cebrián, E. F. Blanco, and A. P. Sierra, “Early warning in egg production curves from commercial hens: A SVM approach,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 121, pp. 169–179, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.12.009.
  27. E. Ferrer et al., “Development of an active risk-based surveillance strategy for avian influenza in Cuba,” Prev. Vet. Med., vol. 116, no. 1–2, pp. 161–167, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.05.012.
  28. P. J. Hepworth, A. V. Nefedov, I. B. Muchnik, and K. L. Morgan, “Broiler chickens can benefit from machine learning: support vector machine analysis of observational epidemiological data,” J. R. Soc. Interface, vol. 9, no. 73, pp. 1934–1942, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0852.
  29. X. Zhuang, M. Bi, J. Guo, S. Wu, and T. Zhang, “Development of an early warning algorithm to detect sick broilers,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 144, pp.102–113,Jan.2018,doi:10.1016/j.compag.2017.11.032.
  30. J. M. Kanter and K. Veeramachaneni, “Deep feature synthesis: Towards automating data science endeavors,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), Campus des Cordeliers, Paris, France, Oct. 2015, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1109/DSAA.2015.7344858.
  31. A. Natekin and A. Knoll, “Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial,” Front. Neurorobotics, vol. 7, 2013, doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021.
  32. F. Pedregosa et al., “Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python,” Mach. Learn. PYTHON, p. 6.
  33. R Core Team, “R: A Language and Enviroment for Statistical Computing,” Publ. Online, 2017.
  34. M. Shamsabardeh, S. Rezaei, J. P. Gomez, B. Martínez-López, and X. Liu, “A novel way to predict PRRS outbreaks in the swine industry using multiple spatio-temporal features and machine learning approaches,” Front. Vet. Sci., vol. 6, 2019, doi: 10.3389/conf.fvets.2019.05.00085.
  35. I. A. D. Paploski, R. K. Bhojwani, J. M. Sanhueza, C. A. Corzo, and K. VanderWaal, “Forecasting viral disease outbreaks at the farm-level for commercial sow farms in the U.S.,” Prev. Vet. Med., vol. 196, p. 105449,Nov.2021,doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105449.
  36. G. S. Silva, G. Machado, K. L. Baker, D. J. Holtkamp, and D. C. L. Linhares, “Machine-learning algorithms to identify key biosecurity practices and factors associated with breeding herds reporting PRRS outbreak,” Prev. Vet. Med., vol. 171, p. 104749, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104749.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Machine learning surveillance swine disease SPC epidemiology

Powered by PhDFocusTM