CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Artificial Intelligence-based Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Solar Photovoltaic Applications

by Vineeth Kumar P.K., Jijesh J.J.
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 184 - Number 42
Year of Publication: 2023
Authors: Vineeth Kumar P.K., Jijesh J.J.
10.5120/ijca2023922526

Vineeth Kumar P.K., Jijesh J.J. . Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Artificial Intelligence-based Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Solar Photovoltaic Applications. International Journal of Computer Applications. 184, 42 ( Jan 2023), 39-48. DOI=10.5120/ijca2023922526

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2023922526,
author = { Vineeth Kumar P.K., Jijesh J.J. },
title = { Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Artificial Intelligence-based Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Solar Photovoltaic Applications },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jan 2023 },
volume = { 184 },
number = { 42 },
month = { Jan },
year = { 2023 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 39-48 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume184/number42/32592-2023922526/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2023922526 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:23:49.417112+05:30
%A Vineeth Kumar P.K.
%A Jijesh J.J.
%T Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Artificial Intelligence-based Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Solar Photovoltaic Applications
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 184
%N 42
%P 39-48
%D 2023
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms are utilized in solar photovoltaic systems to enhance the overall performance. Various conventional MPPT algorithms are employed in solar photovoltaic systems. Nevertheless, those algorithms are futile in the Partial Shaded condition (PSC) and impotent in identifying the maximum power point. Also, the conventional algorithms failed to bi-furcate the local and global maxima during the partial shaded condition. The impact of partial shading results in the false selection of extreme power points in solar photovoltaic sources, and the total efficiency of the PV system comes down. The researchers' advanced MPPT algorithm overcomes the conventional MPPT algorithm. This research deals with the comparative analysis of conventional MPPT algorithm with Artificial Intelligence based MPPT algorithm (AI MPPT) by considering the parameters such as speed of convergence, tracking accuracy, cost of implementation, and efficiency. Moreover, the issues and challenges of selecting an optimized algorithm are discussed in this research work. The performance parameters of MPPT are evaluated individually. The fuzzy logic-based MPPT algorithm performs better than other MPPT algorithms.

References
  1. NovieAyubWindarko, MuhammadNizarHabibi, BambangSumantriet al., “A new MPPT algorithm for photovoltaic power generation under uniform and partial shading conditions”, MDPI journal of Energies, vol. 14, no.2, pp.1-22, January 2021.
  2. Ali M Eltamaly, and Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz “Modern maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic energy system,1st edition, Green Energy and Technology, 2020.
  3. Hamdan, AmiraMaghraby et al, “Random search optimization algorithm based control of supercapacitor integrated with solar photovoltaic system under climate conditions”, International Journal of Renewable Energy Research,vol.12, no.2, pp.611-622, June 2022.
  4. Ali OmarBaba, GuangyuLiu et al, “Classification and evaluation review of maximum point tracking methods”Journal of Sustainable Future, vol.2, no.2, pp.1-29, April 2020.
  5. Haider A Mohammed-Kazim et al, “Efficient maximum power point tracking based on reweighted zero-attracting variable stepsize for grid interfaced photovoltaic systems”, Journal of Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol.85, no.106672, pp.1-17, April 2020.
  6. M Mansoor, A F Mirza, and Q Ling, “Harris hawk optimization-based MPPT control for PV system under partial shading conditions”, Journal of cleaner production, vol.274,no.122857,pp.1-19, 2020.
  7. S Lyden, Harry Galligan, and MdEnamulHaque “A hybrid simulated annealing and perturb and observe maximum power point tracking methods”,IEEE system Journal, vol.15, no.3, pp.4325-4333, September 2021.
  8. PitchaiPandiyan, SubramaniSaravanan, NatarajanPrabaharanet al, “ Implementation of Different MPPT Techniques in Solar PV Tree Under Partial Shading Conditions”, MDPI Journal of Sustainability,vol.13,no.13, pp.1-22, June 2021.
  9. Suraj S, Jijesh J.J, and SarunSoman, “Analysis of Dual Phase Dual Stage Boost Converter for Photovoltaic Applications”, International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no.3, pp.920-928, 2020.
  10. Moacyr A G de Brito, Leonardo P Sampaio ,Luigi G Jr, Guilhereme A e Meloet al, “ Comparative Analysis of MPPT Techniques for PV Applications”, in proc. of International conference on clean electrical power, 2011, doi: 10.1109/ICCEP.2011.6036361.
  11. Mohammed Aslam Husain, AbuTariq, SalmanHameed et al, “Comparitive Assessment of Maximum Power Point Tracking Procedures for Photovoltaic Systems”,Journal of Green Energy & Environment, vol.2, no. 1, pp.5-17, January 2017.
  12. MuralidharKilli, and SusovanSamanta “An Adaptive Voltage Sensor based MPPT for Photovoltaic System with SEPIC Converter Including Steady State and Drift Analysis”, IEEE transaction on Industrial Electronics,vol. 62, no.12, pp. 7609-7619, July 2015.
  13. Jose Miguel Riquelme –Dominguez ,and Sergio Martinez “Systematic Evaluation of Photovoltaic MPPT Algorithms using State-Space Models Under Different Dynamic Test Procedures”, IEEE Power and Energy Society Section, vol.10, no. 21690842, pp. 45772-45783, May 2022.
  14. Claude BertinNzoundjaet al., “A comprehensive Analysis of MPPT Algorithms to optimal power extraction of a PV Panel”, Journal of Solar Energy Research, vol.4, no.3, pp. 172-179, 2019.
  15. S.M.Sousa, L.S Gusman, T.A.S Lopes et al, “MPPT algorithm in single loop current-mode control applied to dc–dc converters with input current source characteristics”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy System, vol.138, no. 107909, June 2022.
  16. AhmedSamirEldessouky et al, “MPPT based on a novel load segmentations structure for PV applications”, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol.1, no. 101937, August 2022.
  17. Mustafa EnginBaşoğlu, “Comprehensive review on distributed maximum power point tracking: Submodule level and module level MPPT strategies”, Solar Energy, vol. 241, pp. 85-108, July 2022.
  18. Vijay Laxmi Mishra et al, “A critical review on advanced reconfigured models and metaheuristics-based MPPT to address complex shadings of solar array”, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 269, no. 116099, October 2022.
  19. P K Vineeth Kumar and Manjunath K, “Analysis, Design, Implementation for control of Non-inverted Zeta converter using Incremental Conductance MPPT Algorithm for SPV Applications”, in proc. of International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control,2017, DOI: 10.1109/ICISC.2017.8068662.
  20. Vineeth Kumar P K and Manjunath K, “A Comparitive Analysis of MPPT Algorithms for Solar Photovoltaic Systems to Improve the Tracking Accuracy”, in proc. International Conference on Control, Power, Communication and Computing Technologies, March 2018, DOI: 10.1109/ICCPCCT.2018.8574336.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MPPT ICA HCA ANN FLS FSCC.