CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Lessons for the Future: Supporting Policy Makers’ Choice of Stringency-Index Level While Facing Pandemic Viruses using Machine Learning Techniques

by Hossam Meshref
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 184 - Number 39
Year of Publication: 2022
Authors: Hossam Meshref
10.5120/ijca2022922505

Hossam Meshref . Lessons for the Future: Supporting Policy Makers’ Choice of Stringency-Index Level While Facing Pandemic Viruses using Machine Learning Techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications. 184, 39 ( Dec 2022), 45-55. DOI=10.5120/ijca2022922505

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2022922505,
author = { Hossam Meshref },
title = { Lessons for the Future: Supporting Policy Makers’ Choice of Stringency-Index Level While Facing Pandemic Viruses using Machine Learning Techniques },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2022 },
volume = { 184 },
number = { 39 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2022 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 45-55 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume184/number39/32575-2022922505/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2022922505 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:23:37.709353+05:30
%A Hossam Meshref
%T Lessons for the Future: Supporting Policy Makers’ Choice of Stringency-Index Level While Facing Pandemic Viruses using Machine Learning Techniques
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 184
%N 39
%P 45-55
%D 2022
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Recently, the Corona pandemic wave has lessened, and most people got vaccinated, but the road to reach this status was rough and had some trials and errors. After going through several challenges with the pandemic during the past two years, a lot of related datasets have been created to help researchers. In these datasets, the choice of stringency level index has played a key role in controlling the spread of the pandemic as well as the associated number of deaths. Machine learning techniques have been deployed to relate policy makers’ choices of stringency index level to different related outcomes such as the number of infected cases as well as the number of associated death cases. In this proposed research, the problem is approached from a different angle where the designed machine learning models will predict the stringency index level based on a few attributes such as infected cases and death cases. Different supervised machine learning techniques have been used in the designed models, and the achieved accuracies reached 94.84%. In addition, an important note for policy makers wasrevealedto take into consideration while applying the designed prediction models to make their decision choices more robust. It is believed that the discovered lag noted in public response to the applied stringency measures should be amended to achieve better accurate results and therefore a solution for policy makershave been suggested. Based on the findings of our proposed research, it is believed that policy makers could benefit from the designed prediction models as well as the lag avoidance suggested approach to have more control on similar future pandemics.

References
  1. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 Variants, Accessed: Oct-2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/EN/ACTIVITIES/TRACKING-SARS-COV-2-VARIANTS/.
  2. C. Violato, E.M. Violato, and E.M. Violato, “Impact of the stringency of lockdown measures on covid-19: A theoretical model of a pandemic,” PLoS ONE, 16(10): e0258205, pp. 1-14, 2021.
  3. L.H. Chan, P. Lee, C.Y. Chan, K.B.H. Lam, and P. Ho, “Monitoring respiratory infections in covid-19 epidemics,” BMJ, 369:m1628, pp. 1-8, 2020.
  4. N. M. Ferguson et al., “Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand,” Tech. Rep., Imperial College, London, pp. 1-20, 2020.
  5. M.U.G. Kraemer et al., “The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China,” Science 368, pp. 493–497, 2020.
  6. B. Tang et al., “Estimation of the transmission risk of the 2019-nCoV and its implication for public health interventions,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(2), 462, pp. 1-13, 2020.
  7. J. Sun, K. Kwek, M. Li, and H. Shen, “Effects of Social Mobility and Stringency Measures on the COVID-19 Outcomes: Evidence From the United States,” Front. Public Health 9:779501,pp. 1-5, 2021.
  8. Y. Zhai, D. Jiang, G. Gozgor, and E. Cho, “The amplifying effect of conflicts on case fatality rate of COVID-19: evidence from 120 countries,” Front Public Health, 9:1059, pp. 1-7, 2021.
  9. J. Hainmueller, and C. Hazlett, “Kernel regularized least squares: reducing misspecification bias with a flexible and interpretable machine learning approach,” Political Analysis, 22(2), pp. 143–68, 2014.
  10. A. Musić, J.H. Telalović, and D. Đulović, “The Influence of Stringency Measures and Socio-Economic Data on COVID-19 Outcomes,” In: Hasic Telalovic, J., Kantardzic, M. (eds) Mediterranean Forum – Data Science Conference. MeFDATA 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1343, pp. 39-54, Springer, Cham.
  11. Nikolopoulos, K., et al., “Forecasting and planning during a pandemic: COVID-19 growth rates, supply chain disruptions, and governmental decisions,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol.290(1), pp. 99-115, 2021.
  12. H.M. Paiva, R.J.M. Afonso, I.L. de Oliveira, and G.F. Garcia, “A data-driven model to describe and forecast the dynamics of COVID-19 transmission,” Plos One, vol.15(7), e0236386, pp. 1-16,2020.
  13. F. Rustam, et al., “COVID-19 future forecasting using supervised machine learning models,” IEEE Access, vol.8, pp. 101489–101499, 2020.
  14. P. He, “Study on epidemic prevention and control strategy of COVID -19 based on personnel flow prediction,” In: 2020 International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS), pp. 688–691. Zhuhai, China, 2020.
  15. A. Mellone, Z. Gong, and G. Scarciotti, “Modelling, prediction and design of COVID-19 lockdowns by stringency and duration,” Sci Rep, vol.11, 15708, 2021.
  16. C. Huang, et al., “Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China,” Lancet, vol.395(10223), pp. 497–506, 2020.
  17. N. Haug, et al., “Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions,” Nature-Human Behaviour, vol.4, pp. 1303–1312, 2020.
  18. V. Alfano and S. Ercolano, “The Efficacy of Lockdown Against COVID-19: A Cross-Country Panel Analysis,” Applied Health Economics & Health Policy, vol.18, pp. 509–517, 2020.
  19. Y. Mohamadou, A. Halidou, and P.T. Kapen, “A review of mathematical modeling, artificial intelligence and datasets used in the study, prediction and management of COVID-19,” Applied Intelligence, Vol.50, pp. 3913–3925, 2020.
  20. H. Meshref, “Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis: A Machine Learning Interpretation Approach,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), Vol.10(12), 2019.
  21. H. Meshref, “Predicting Loan Approval of Bank Direct Marketing Data Using Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms,” International Journal of Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, Vol.14, pp. 914-922, 2020.
  22. I. Witten, E. Frank, M. Hall, and C. Pal, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 4th Edition, Morgan Kaufmann Publications, pp. 167–183, 2017.
  23. P-N Tan, M. Steinbach, A. Karpatne, and V. Kumar, Introduction to Data Mining, 2nd Edition, Pearson Publications, pp. 276-293, 2018.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Corona Pandemic Stringency Index Supervised Machine Learning Techniques