CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Learnability Evaluation Model for Android Mobile Applications

by Muna Alrazgan, Nuha A. AlRajhi
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 184 - Number 35
Year of Publication: 2022
Authors: Muna Alrazgan, Nuha A. AlRajhi
10.5120/ijca2022922449

Muna Alrazgan, Nuha A. AlRajhi . Learnability Evaluation Model for Android Mobile Applications. International Journal of Computer Applications. 184, 35 ( Nov 2022), 41-49. DOI=10.5120/ijca2022922449

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2022922449,
author = { Muna Alrazgan, Nuha A. AlRajhi },
title = { Learnability Evaluation Model for Android Mobile Applications },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Nov 2022 },
volume = { 184 },
number = { 35 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2022 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 41-49 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume184/number35/32544-2022922449/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2022922449 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:23:14.604604+05:30
%A Muna Alrazgan
%A Nuha A. AlRajhi
%T Learnability Evaluation Model for Android Mobile Applications
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 184
%N 35
%P 41-49
%D 2022
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Educational mobile applications have become an important tool in education. In addition, its spread played a major role in this field. In order to use it efficiently, we must adopt the concept of learnability. By applying some standards, learnability characterizes how easy it is to use a certain application. In other words, it is the answer to whether the users can complete simple tasks on their first attempt. This paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation model for learnability that can help define clear learnability dimensions based on several approaches to measure learnability. Hence, improves users’ learnability while using a mobile application targeting Android system mobile applications. The research approach will follow these steps: integration of multiple resources, building a framework, testing, and reporting results. We proposed a new learnability evaluation model for Android mobile applications. We will use this model as a basis for our framework to measure how learnable any Android mobile application is. Moreover, generates results using three integrated learnability methods: Performance measurement learnability curve as a logarithmic approximation, Petri-net approach through fitness value, and analytics through logs as well as other related measurements. The results of this study offer clear statistics for measuring Learnability and assets to improve the approach to designing a mobile application to be more learnable for users.

References
  1. Jacobsen, J., Lorena, M.: Usability und UX. Rheinwerk Verlag (2017)
  2. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., Diakopoulos, N.: Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson (2018)
  3. Chistyakov, A., Soto-Sanfiel, M.T., Martí, E., Igarashi, T., Carrabina, J.: Objective Learnability Estimation of Software Systems. In: International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, Springer (2016) 503–513
  4. Nielsen, J.: Usability engineering. Academic Press (1993).
  5. Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G., Attar, R.: A survey of software Learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2009) 649–658
  6. R. Bavani, Azizah Jaafar and N. F. Mohd Yatim, "A study on web experience among visually impaired users in Malaysia," 2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), Shah Alam, 2010, pp. 11-15, doi: 10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716714.
  7. I. Rafique, J. Weng, Y. Wang, M. Q. Abbasi, P. Lew and X. Wang, "Evaluating software Learnability: A Learnability attributes model," 2012 International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI2012), Yantai, 2012, pp. 2443-2447, doi: 10.1109/ICSAI.2012.6223548.
  8. T. Grossman, G. Fitzmaurice and R. Attar, "A Survey of Software Learnability: Metrics, Methodologies and Guidelines," 27th intl. conf. on Human fact. in comp. sys., NY, USA, 2009, pp. 649-658.
  9. ISO. (2020, 10 10). ISO-Usability. Retrieved from ISO: https://iso25000.com/index.php/en/iso-25000-standards/iso-25010/61-usability.
  10. N. Ngadiman, S. Sulaiman and W. Mohd Nasir Wan Kadir, "A systematic literature review on attractiveness and Learnability factors in Web applications," 2015 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS), Bandar Melaka, 2015, pp. 22-27, doi: 10.1109/ICOS.2015.7377272.
  11. Application Usability from an End User Perspective", School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, China, 2007.
  12. J. L. A. Herrera, M. V. F. D. Valdenebro, M. A. H. Juspian, A. T Arroyo, and C. A. C. Ordoñez, "Architectural patterns regard ing Web application domain usability", Geniera E Investigacian, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 52-55, 2010.
  13. J. Brown, “Evaluation of the Task-Action Grammar Method for Assessing Learnability in User Interface Software”, Computer-Human Interaction, Proceedings of the Sixth Australian Conference, pp. 308-309, 1996.
  14. M. Papagelis and D. Plexousakis, “Qualitative Analysis of User-based And Item-based Prediction Algorithms for Recommendation Agents”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 781-789, 2005.
  15. A. N. Tuch, S. P. Roth, K. Hornb, K. Opwis, and J. A. Bargas-AvilaIs, “Beautiful Really Usable? Toward Understanding the Relation Between Usability, Aesthetics, and Affect in HCI”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.28, pp. 1596–1607, 2012.
  16. V. Pasek and D.Lytle, “Mission-critical Software Development for A Distributed And Diverse User Base’, Aerospace Conference, IEEE, pp. 1-12, 2011.
  17. S. Noordin, W. F. W. Ahmad, and Y. K. Hooi, “Study of Effectiveness and Usability of Multimedia Courseware Integrated with 3-Dimensional Model as a Teaching Aid”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 16, No.4, pp. 975-8887, 2011.
  18. M. S. Kurecic, “Improvement of Web Design Using The Heuristic Evaluation Method”, ACTA GRAPH, Faculty of Graphic Arts, University of Zagreb, Croatia, pp. 1-4, 7-14, 2005.
  19. R. A. Kamaludeen, S. Sulaiman, and Y. Cheah, “Expert-Based Decision Support Framework for Software Reengineering”, 5th Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering (MySEC), 2011.
  20. X. Zhang, H. Liu , and A. Abraham, “A Novel Process Network Model for Interacting Context-Aware Web Services” , Services Computing, IEEE Transactions, IEEE Computer Society, 2012.
  21. W. Shen, H. Ghenniwa, and Y. Li, “Agent-Based Service-Oriented Computing and Applications”, 1st International Symposium on Pervasive Computing and Applications, 2006.
  22. S. Al-Fedaghi, "Developing Web applications", International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 57-68, 2011.
  23. L. Delía, G. Cáseres, H. Ramón, P. Thomas, and R. Bertone, “Framework for Web application Agile Development”, The Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2007.
  24. W. W. Bernd, P. Robert, and U. Sebastian, “Determinants of Social Media Website Attractiveness”, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2013.
  25. S. Alistair, “Assessing the Reliability of Heuristic Evaluation for Website Attractiveness and Usability”, Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002.
  26. M. Hamzi and A. Hajmoosaei, “Web Interface Design For Academic Institutions”, e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), 2014 IEEE Conference, pp. 7-11, 2014.
  27. Heikkinen, Jani & Olsson, Thomas &Väänänen, Kaisa. (2009). Expectations for User Experience in Haptic Communication with Mobile Devices. 10.1145/1613858.1613895.
  28. Csapo´ A´ ,Werse´nyi G, Nagy H, Stockman T. A survey of assistive technologies and applications for blind users on mobile platforms: a review and foundation for research. J Multimodal User Interfaces. 2015; 9(4):275–86.
  29. Hoggan E, Crossan A, Brewster S, Kaaresoja T. Audio or tactile feedback: Which modality when? In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston, USA; 2009. p. 2253–6.
  30. Maclean KE, Hayward V. Do It Yourself Haptics: Part II [Tutorial]. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 2008; 15(1):104–19.
  31. Stephan KL, Smith SE, Martin RL, Parker SPA, McAnally KI. Learning and Retention of Associations Between Auditory Icons and Denotative Referents: Implications for the Design of Auditory Warnings. Human Factors. 2006;48(2):288-299.
  32. Enriquez M, MacLean K. The role of choice in longitudinal recall of meaningful tactile signals. In: 16th Symposium on Haptics Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2008. Reno, USA; 2008.
  33. González-Cañete FJ, López Rodríguez JL, Galdón PM, Díaz-Estrella A. Improvements in the Learnability of smartphone haptic interfaces for visually impaired users. PLoS One. 2019 Nov 11;14(11): e0225053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225053. PMID: 31710628; PMCID: PMC6844543.
  34. B. Ramayah et al., Analysis of Visually Impaired Users Navigation Techniques in Complex and Noncomplex Layout by using Spectrum, in: H. B. Jaman et al. (Eds.), Advances in Visual Informatics. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2017, pp. 43-49.
  35. J. Oliveira et al., BrailleType: Unleashing Braille over Touch Screen Mobile Phones, Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011, Lisbon, Portugal, 2011, pp. 100-107.
  36. S. Azenkot et al., Perkinput: Eyes-free Text Entry on Mobile Devices. PhD Forum at Grace HopperCelebration of Women in Computing. Minneapolis, USA, 2013.
  37. R. L. Milne et al., VBGhost: A Braille-Based Educational Smartphone Game for Children. 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York, USA, 2013.
  38. NAHAR, Lutfun; JAAFAR, Azizah; SULAIMAN, Riza. USABILITY EVALUATION OF A MOBILE PHONE BASED BRAILLE LEARNING APPLICATION "MBRAILLE". Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, [S.l.], p. 108-117, nov. 2019. ISSN 0127-9084.
  39. Kitchenham, B.A., Hughes, R.T., Linkman, S.G.: Modeling software measurement data. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 27(9), 788–804 (2001).
  40. Chistyakov, Alexey & Soto-Sanfiel, María & Martí, Enric& Igarashi, Takeo &Carrabina, Jordi. (2016). Objective Learnability Estimation of Software Systems. 503-513. 10.1007/978-3-319-48746-5_52.
  41. Frøkjær, E., Hertzum, M., Hornbæk, K.: Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? In: CHI 2000 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human, vol. 2, pp. 345–352 (2000) http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/332040.332455
  42. Pizziol, S., Tessier, C., Dehais, F.: Petri net-based modelling of human–automation conflicts in aviation. Ergonomics 57 (2014) 319–331
  43. Li Q., Chen YL. (2009) Data Flow Diagram. In: Modeling and Analysis of Enterprise and Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89556-5_4.
  44. Tullis, Thomas S. et al. “An Empirical Comparison of Lab and Remote Usability Testing of Web Sites.” (2002).
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Learnability evaluation model Android application Mobile users Learnability Mobile applications learnability easiness of learning

Powered by PhDFocusTM