CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

A Comparative Study on Electronic Litigation

by M.Kh. Abd-Elkawe, M. Bilal, A.M. Abd-Elwahab
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 184 - Number 32
Year of Publication: 2022
Authors: M.Kh. Abd-Elkawe, M. Bilal, A.M. Abd-Elwahab
10.5120/ijca2022922412

M.Kh. Abd-Elkawe, M. Bilal, A.M. Abd-Elwahab . A Comparative Study on Electronic Litigation. International Journal of Computer Applications. 184, 32 ( Oct 2022), 69-74. DOI=10.5120/ijca2022922412

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2022922412,
author = { M.Kh. Abd-Elkawe, M. Bilal, A.M. Abd-Elwahab },
title = { A Comparative Study on Electronic Litigation },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Oct 2022 },
volume = { 184 },
number = { 32 },
month = { Oct },
year = { 2022 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 69-74 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume184/number32/32524-2022922412/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2022922412 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:23:01.079580+05:30
%A M.Kh. Abd-Elkawe
%A M. Bilal
%A A.M. Abd-Elwahab
%T A Comparative Study on Electronic Litigation
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 184
%N 32
%P 69-74
%D 2022
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of electronic litigation by researching the concept of electronic litigation and its importance the development of the judicial field. Determining the procedures for filing and adjudicating cases through the electronic litigation system. The study concluded that it is necessary to implement the electronic litigation system, with the extension of its application to include all litigation procedures from beginning to end. In addition, this paper urges the necessity of regulating these procedures legislatively to comply with the general rules and principles of litigation, taking into account the special nature of electronic litigation means.

References
  1. Wallace B. Jefferson & Others (2012), "In the supreme court of Texas order requiring electronic filing in certain courts", so ordered, this 11 of December, pp1-5, available at : supreme.court.state.tx.us )Synopsis, E.-S. E. (2005). "Malaysian Shariah Judiciary Department." Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad, Kuala Lumpur.
  2. Severine, B, (2004), les Juridiction administreatives- vont experimenter les teleprocedures, ajda, 2004, .p844-845.Motsaathebe, L. & Mnjama, N. (2009). "The Management of High Court Records in Botswana," Records Management Journal, 19(3), 173 – 189.
  3. Synopsis, E.-S. E. (2005). "Malaysian Shariah Judiciary Department." Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad, Kuala LumpurCarl Michael (2009). litigation: public access to court electronic record.
  4. Michael griese, (2007), p. 5.
  5. Ismail, I. (2006, Feb 13). 'Faster Processes with E-Shariah,' New Straitds Times. Malaysian Shariah Judiciary Department (2005). 'E-Shariah Implementation Synopsis,' Motsaathebe, L. & Mnjama, N. (2009). "The Management of High Court Records in Botswana," Records Management Journal, 19(3), 173 – 189Malaysian Shariah Judiciary Department (2005). 'E-Shariah Implementation Synopsis'.
  6. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava (2010). "A Guide to India›s Legal Research and Legal System".
  7. Motsaathebe, L. & Mnjama, N. (2009). "The Management of High Court Records in Botswana," Records Management Journal, 19(3), 173 – 189.
  8. Carl Michael (2009). litigation: public access to court electronic record.
  9. Michael griese (2007)." electronic Litigation Filing In The USA".
  10. BRONDEL Séveine: Les jurisdictions administrativesvont experimenter les téléproceduresn, AJDA, avril 2004, pp844et845
  11. Hamid, S. A. (2010). 'Personal Communication,' October 11, 2010. Hasan, K. (2007). 'Court Records Management in Malaysia. Personal Communication,' June 10, 2010.
  12. MARCO Velicogana:(2007), "commission européene pour l’efficacité de la justice, utilization des technologies de l’informationet de la communication dans les systems judiciaireseuropéens" , p 36 , sur le site:www.coe.int/t/dghi/cooperation/cepei/series/EtudesTICfr.pdf.
  13. Rosimah (2010).
  14. E-Committee Supreme Court of India New Delhi: "National policy and action plan for implementation of information and communication technology in the Indian judiciary", 1 st August, available at: www.supriem court. Of Indianic.in p.p 1-47
  15. Prue Innes (Courts Information Officer), “Restored Supreme Court uses Latest Court Technology”, Supreme Court of Victoria Media Release, 11.10.99. http://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/CA256902000FE154/Lookup/MediaReleases/$
  16. Practice Note No 1 of 2002, Guidelines for the use of Technology in any Civil Matter, published 29.4.02. See now Practice Note No 1 of 2007, Guidelines for the Use of Technology in any Civil Litigation Matter.
  17. "The review was conducted by the Victorian Society for Computers and the Law headed by Sandra Potter and Phil Farrelly as co-chairs of the Society’s Practice and Procedures Focus Group on behalf of the court": Sandra Potter and Peter Moon, “Supreme Court of Victoria Practice Note 1 of 2002- Guidelines for the use of technology in civil matters”, (2002) 49 NSW Society for Computers and the Law Journal, at:http://www.nswscl.org.au/journal/49/Potter_Moon.html, accessed10.8.07. )
  18. Practice Note No 105 Use of Technology in Civil Litigation was replaced by Practice Note No 127 Use of Technology in Civil Litigation, with effect from 1 March 2004. This was replaced by SC Gen 7 Supreme Court – Use of Technology, with effect from 17 August 2005. This was in turn replaced by Practice Note SC Gen 7 which was published on 15 August 2006 and commenced on 1 September 2006
  19. The Hon MEJ Black AC, Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, “New Technology Developments in the Courts: Usages, Trends and Recent Developments in Australia”, paper presented at the Seventh Worldwide Common Law Judiciary Conference, May 2007 at 17-18.
  20. The Practice Direction stood as Supreme Court Practice Direction 52, District Court Practice Direction No 10, and Magistrates Court Practice Direction No 1 of 2001.
  21. The Practice Direction can be accessed at: http://www.nt.gov.au/ntsc/documents/20060106NT_SupremeCourt%20PracticeDirec tions.pdf .
  22. Shariah Judiciary Department of Malaysia (2005). 'Synopsis of E-Shariah Implimentation History,' Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad, Kuala Lumpur.
  23. http://www.aija.org.au/info/techn/guideciv.htm
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Electronic Litigation Electronic Court Electronic Government.