CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Comparative Study of Fingerprint Individuality Models

by Oluwatayo Samuel Ogunlana
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 183 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2021
Authors: Oluwatayo Samuel Ogunlana
10.5120/ijca2021921322

Oluwatayo Samuel Ogunlana . A Comparative Study of Fingerprint Individuality Models. International Journal of Computer Applications. 183, 5 ( May 2021), 40-47. DOI=10.5120/ijca2021921322

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2021921322,
author = { Oluwatayo Samuel Ogunlana },
title = { A Comparative Study of Fingerprint Individuality Models },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2021 },
volume = { 183 },
number = { 5 },
month = { May },
year = { 2021 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 40-47 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume183/number5/31926-2021921322/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2021921322 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:15:58.433277+05:30
%A Oluwatayo Samuel Ogunlana
%T A Comparative Study of Fingerprint Individuality Models
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 183
%N 5
%P 40-47
%D 2021
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The use of fingerprint as a means of identification and verification of human identity cannot be over-emphasized in our society due to its reliability, immutability and individuality. It is still the most reliable biometric used to identify individual. Application areas include but not limited to Police, Security, access control and investigation of criminal cases. Several models have been developed for quantitatively established the degree of fingerprint individuality. These models are based on grids, polar systems, fixed probabilities, relative measurements and generative distributions. This paper provides a comparative study of commonly known fingerprint individuality models with emphasis on methodologies, strengths and weakness.

References
  1. Iwasokun, G. B. and Akinyokun, O. C. 2014 Fingerprint Singular Point Detection Based on Modified Poincare Index Method, International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 7(5), pp 259-272
  2. Ogunlana, S.O., Olabode, O, and Iwasokun, G.B. Fingerprint Individuality Model based on Pattern Type and Singular Point Attribute. International Journal of Information Security Science. Accepted for Publication.
  3. Srihari, S.N. and Srinivasan, H. 2007. Individuality of Fingerprints: Comparison of Models and Measurements. Preprint submitted to Elsevier, pp.1-26.
  4. Pankanti, S., Prabhakar, S. and Jain, A.K. 2002. On the Individuality of Fingerprints, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(8), pp. 1010-1025
  5. Abraham, J. 2017 Statistical models for the support of forensic identifications. PhD thesis to Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology, Sydney.
  6. Stoney, D. 2011 Measurement of fingerprint individuality. In Advances in Fingerprint Technology, 2nd Edition.
  7. Zhu, Y., Dass, S. and Jain, A.K. 2007 Statistical Models for Assessing the Individuality of Fingerprints, IEEE Trans on Information Forensics and Security, Vol.2, pp.391-401.
  8. Henry, E. 2004 Classification and uses of fingerprints. Routledge & Sons London, pp 1-64. Digital edition prepared for http://galton.org by Gava Tredoux.
  9. Champod, C. and Margot, P. 1996 Computer assisted analysis of minutiae occurrences on fingerprints. Proc. International symposium on Fingerprint Detection and Identification.
  10. Chen, J. and Moon, Y. 2007 A Minutiae- based Fingerprint Individuality Model, Proceedings of Computer Society International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2007), 18-23 Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  11. Fang, G., Srihari, S.N. and Srinivasan, H. 2007 Generative models for fingerprint individuality using ridge types. IEEE, 3rd International Symposium on Information assurance and Safety.
  12. Zhao, Q., Zhang, Y., Jain, A.K., Paulter, N. G. and Taylor, M. 2013 A generative Model for Fingerprint Minutiae. IEEE.
  13. Chen, J. and Moon, Y. 2008 The Statistical Modeling of Fingerprint Minutiae Distribution with implications for fingerprint individuality Studies. IEEE, 978-1-4244-2243.
  14. Kholmatov, A. and Yanikoglu, B. 2008 An Individuality Model for online Signature using global Fourier Descriptors. Proc of SPIE.
  15. Su, S. and Srihari, S.N. 2008 Generative Models for Fingerprint Individuality using Ridge Models, IEEE, pp.1-4
  16. Dass, S.C. 2010 Assessing Fingerprint Individuality in Presence of Noisy Minutiae, Department of statistics and Probability Technical Report. Michigan State University.
  17. Dass, S. C., Lim, C. Y. and Maiti, T. 2014 A generalized mixed Model Framework for Assessing Fingerprint Individuality in Presence of Varying Image Quality, Annal of Applied Statistics, 8(3), pp.1314-1340.
  18. Thakar, M. K. and Sharma, T. 2016 Digital grid method for fingerprint identification and objective report writing. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, pp 194-201.
  19. Choi, H., Choi, K. and Kim, J. 2011 Fingerprint Matching incorporating ridge features with minutiae. IEEE, Transactions of Information Forensics and Security, 6(2), pp 339-345
  20. Feng, J., Ouyang, Z. and Cai, A. 2006 Fingerprint Matching using Ridges. The Journal of the Pattern Recognition Society, pp 2131-2140.
  21. Dass, S.C. 2014 Individuality of Fingerprint: A Review. Springer Verlag London. 2014, pp 1-19.
  22. Chen, Y. and Jain, A. K. 2009 Beyond Minutiae: A Fingerprint Individuality Model with Pattern, Ridge and Pore Features, Proceedings of International Conference on Biometric, pp.523 - 533,Available: http://biometrics.cse.msu.edu/Publications/Fingerprint/ChenJainIndividuality_ICB09.pdf
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Fingerprint individuality Probability of random correspondence minutiae and ridges model

Powered by PhDFocusTM