We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Analysis of Risk Assessment on Student Credit Services using COBIT 5 Framework

by Angelin Francisca Tamara, Imam Riadi
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 183 - Number 42
Year of Publication: 2021
Authors: Angelin Francisca Tamara, Imam Riadi
10.5120/ijca2021921826

Angelin Francisca Tamara, Imam Riadi . Analysis of Risk Assessment on Student Credit Services using COBIT 5 Framework. International Journal of Computer Applications. 183, 42 ( Dec 2021), 50-58. DOI=10.5120/ijca2021921826

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2021921826,
author = { Angelin Francisca Tamara, Imam Riadi },
title = { Analysis of Risk Assessment on Student Credit Services using COBIT 5 Framework },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2021 },
volume = { 183 },
number = { 42 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2021 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 50-58 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume183/number42/32215-2021921826/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2021921826 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:19:30.451656+05:30
%A Angelin Francisca Tamara
%A Imam Riadi
%T Analysis of Risk Assessment on Student Credit Services using COBIT 5 Framework
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 183
%N 42
%P 50-58
%D 2021
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Student credit services in its operational activities has implemented an information system to carry out business processes on student credit services quite well, but there is still no good integration and coordination from each staff. [1] Student credit services needs to evaluate the existing information system to find out how effective and efficient the impact is provided by the related information system. There are three stages of analysis in the research, namely determining the current and expected level of capability, conducting an analysis gap, and providing recommendations and suggestions for improvement. The process of collecting data in this study uses a tool in the form of a questionnaire. The results of the study are the current capability level for the APO12 domain (manage risk) with a value of 2.86 which means at level 2 (managed process) meaning IT processes in student credit services Installment of solutions partner Technology Yogyakarta has been carried out, achieved, and managed well. While the expected level of capability is at level 3 (established process) meaning IT processes in student credit Installment of solutions partner Technology has been well managed, must be standardized for example services, security and sustainability management, service support for users, and operational facilities which are then enforced throughout the company. The calculation results of the value Gap for the APO12 (domain, it is managed risk) obtained a value of 1. While for the EDM03 (domain, ensure risk optimization) the capability value is 2.87 (managed process) and the result of the calculation of the Gap value is 1, this is the making recommendations. This research has been carried out well by the expected research objectives.

References
  1. Installment. (nd). Cicil.co.id. Retrieved from https://cicil.co.id/: Accessed on December 17, 2020, 19.45 WIB
  2. Hartono, J (2005). Analysis and Design of Information Systems Structured Approaches to Business Applications theory and practice. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  3. Jogiyanto, A. (2011). Information Technology Governance System. Andi. PublisherStewart,
  4. J., Chapple, M., & Gibson, D. (2015). CISSP(ISC) 2 Certified Information Systems Security Professional Official Study Guide. 7th Edition, Wiley
  5. ISACA 2017. (nd). About COBIT 5.
  6. ISACA. (2012). COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT. Rolling Meadows, ISACA.
  7. M.Garsoux. (2013). COBIT 5 ISACA's new framework for IT Governance, Risk, Security and Auditing.
  8. ISACA. (2012). COBIT 5: A Business Framework For The Governance And Management Of Enterprise IT.
  9. Jung, Ho-Won, & Hunter, R. (nd). The Relationship Between ISO/IEC 15504 Process Capability Levels, ISO 9001 Certification and Organization Size. An Empirical Study. Elsevier.
  10. Fuad, MN (2020). Analysis of Risk Management Assessment in UAD HR Information Technology Services Using the COBIT 5 Method.
  11. Jarsa and K. Christianto (2018). “IT Governance Audit with COBIT 5 Framework on DSS Domain,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Computer. Network. Computer. Electron. Control
  12. Setyaningrum Dwi Novia, et al., (2018). “Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using the COBIT 5 Framework (Case Study: PT. Kimia Farma (PERSERO) Tbk – Plant Watudakon.” Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science Development, Vol. 2, No.1. Malang Hardinata, RS,
  13. Fitriani, W., & et al. (January 2019). Information Technology Governance Audit Using COBIT 5. Journal of Engineering and Informatics Vol. 6, No. 1, Pg. 42 - 45.
  14. M Hanafi, M. (2009). Risk, Risk Management Process, and Enterprise Risk Management. EKMA4262 Module 1, p. 1- 40.
  15. Mizuno, S. (1994). Overall Company Quality Control, Management Series no 151. Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Pressindo. Pinontoan, J. (October 2010). IT Risk Management - Concepts. PC Media Magazine.
  16. Rahayu, T., Matondang, N., & Hananto, B. (March 2020). Academic Information System Audit Using COBIT Method 5. Journal of Information Technology and Education Vol.13, No.1, them. 117-123.
  17. Rohaini, E., Assegaff, S., & William. (April 2020). Evaluation of Information System Governance Using COBIT 5 at PT. Sinar Sentosa Primatama Jambi. Scientific Journal of Media Sisfo Vol. 14, No.1, p. 45 - 53.
  18. Sekarini, IA, Candiasa, IM, & Aryanto, KY (May 2021). Electronic Medical Records (EMR) System Audit at Kasih Ibu Hospital Using the COBIT Framework 5. Journal of Systems and Information (JSI), p. 134 - 143.
  19. Sugiyono. (September 2019). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: ALFABETA.
  20. Triyanto, T., & Gata, W. (February 2018). Maturity Level Information Management
  21. Andrianti, A., & Assegaff, S. (June 2018). Analysis and Design of IT Governance Using COBIT 5 Framework in Data Management PT. US BPR. Journal of Information Systems Management Vol.3, No.2, p. 98
  22. Putri, C. (2017). Risk Assessment of Information Technology Processes Based on the COBIT 5 Framework at the Helpdesk, Sub-directorate of Information Technology and Systems Services, Directorate of Information Technology and Systems Development (DPTSI) Sepuluh Institute of Technology. 241.
  23. Prastiyawan, DA, Ambarwati, A., & Setiawan, E. (2020). Analysis of Risk Management Dealer Management System Services Using COBIT 5. Matrix: Journal of Information Technology and Management, 10(2), 43–49
  24. Astuti, R. (2018). Implementation of Information System Risk Management Using COBIT 5. Media Informatics, 17(1), 18–28.
  25. Yani, IP, Suprapto, & Admaja, DH (2018). Assessment of the Capabilities of Application of Information Technology Risk Management Using the COBIT 5 Framework (Study on PDAM Malang City, East Java). Development of Information Technology and Computer Science.
  26. Andriani,Y. P. (2021) “Risk Assessment of Monitoring Service usimg COBIT 5 Framework” 183(37), Pg 8-16
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Risk assessment RACI chart COBIT 5

Powered by PhDFocusTM