We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Web Forensic for Hate Speech Case on Facebook Services using National Institute of Standards Technology Method

by Nunung Anggriani, Imam Riadi
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 183 - Number 42
Year of Publication: 2021
Authors: Nunung Anggriani, Imam Riadi
10.5120/ijca2021921817

Nunung Anggriani, Imam Riadi . Web Forensic for Hate Speech Case on Facebook Services using National Institute of Standards Technology Method. International Journal of Computer Applications. 183, 42 ( Dec 2021), 14-21. DOI=10.5120/ijca2021921817

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2021921817,
author = { Nunung Anggriani, Imam Riadi },
title = { Web Forensic for Hate Speech Case on Facebook Services using National Institute of Standards Technology Method },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2021 },
volume = { 183 },
number = { 42 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2021 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 14-21 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume183/number42/32210-2021921817/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2021921817 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:19:26.926556+05:30
%A Nunung Anggriani
%A Imam Riadi
%T Web Forensic for Hate Speech Case on Facebook Services using National Institute of Standards Technology Method
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 183
%N 42
%P 14-21
%D 2021
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The development of information technology is increasing rapidly, has brought humans to a point where they cannot separate from the use of the internet in everyday life. The high growth of internet users is the potential for many internet users to use social media. By data compiled from databoks.katadata.co.id which shows the ranking of social media often used in Indonesia 2020, Facebook is in third place after YouTube and WhatsApp. The features offered by Facebook as a social media make many people use it as well as its ease of communication without having to incur costs such as SMS (Short Message Service). The use of Facebook through a web browser itself has often been used by many people and not a few are also used as a medium to commit crimes such as hate speech cases, so it is very important to investigate. The stages used to analyze digital evidence in this study are using the forensic method created by the National Institute of Standards Technology (NIST) which has four stages, namely Collection, Examination, Analysis, and Reporting. The percentage of results obtained from several tools used is the Facebook API 20% only managed to find account information in the form of profile photos, account names, and emails used, FTK Imager 80% successfully found posts along with deleted comments, account information, and login access, while Browser History Viewer 40% was able to find posts in the form of images and account information. From the results of this study, it was found that all the desired information was obtained using the tool, DumpIt + FTK Imager both main evidence and supporting evidence were found in tools, while Browser History Capture + Browser History Viewer only obtained information in the form of posting images, then searching for data using the Facebook API no deleted posts were found, only account information was found, because the use of the Facebook API was restricted to access permissions. By using some of these tools, this research managed to find all the posts that have been deleted.

References
  1. Y. Fitriani and R. Pakpahan, “Analysis of the Abuse of Social Media for the Spread of Cybercrime in Cyberspace,” CAKRAWALA J. Hum. Bina Sarana Inform., vol. 20, no. 1, 2020.
  2. D. H. Jayani, “10 Most Used Social Media in Indonesia,” 2020.https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2020/02/26/10-media-sosial-yang-paling-sering-digunakan-di-indonesia.
  3. H. Arshad, A. Jantan, and E. Omolara, “Evidence collection and forensics on social networks: Research challenges and directions,” Digit. Investig., vol. 28, pp. 126–138, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.diin.2019.02.001.
  4. T. D. Larasati, “Live Forensics Perbandingan Aplikasi Instant Messenger Live Forensics Analysis for Comparing Instant Messenger Applications ( Line, Facebook, and Telegram ) on Windows 10 Operating System,” 2017.
  5. M. A. Yaqin, “Live Forensics Method Analysis on Laptop Memory Devices for Linux-Based Digital Artifact Search,” 2019, [Online]. Available: http://repository.unmuhjember.ac.id/id/eprint/3386.
  6. R. A. Bintang, R. Umar, and A. Yudhana, “Facebook Lite Social Media Analysis with Forensic tools using the NIST Method,” Techno (Jurnal Fak. Tek. Univ. Muhammadiyah Purwokerto), vol. 21, no. 2, p. 125, 2020, doi: 10.30595/techno.v21i2.8494.
  7. R. A. Kinasih, A. W. Muhammad, and W. A. Prabowo, “Browser Security Analysis Using the National Institute of Justice Method (Case Study: Facebook and Instagram),” Digit. Zo. J. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 11, no. x, pp. 174–184, 2020.
  8. W. A. Mukti, S. U. Masruroh, and D. Khairani, “Analysis and Comparison of Forensic Evidence Facebook and Twitter Social Media Applications on Android Smartphones,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 2018, doi: 10.15408/jti.v10i1.6820.
  9. Setie Ruhdi Koara, “Digital Forensic Analysis On Facebook Messenger Web For Cybercrime Case Handling,” 2019.
  10. R. Umar, I. Riadi, and G. M. Zamroni, “Mobile Forensic Tools Evaluation for Digital Crime Investigation,” no. June 2018, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.8.3.3591.
  11. B. Rahardjo, “Digital Forensics at a Glance,” J. Sosioteknologi, 2013.
  12. E. Casey, Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers, and the internet, Third. Academic Press, 2011.
  13. S. Pomalingo, “Social Media Investigation Using Data Visualization With Directed Graph Method,” 2019, [Online]. Available: dspace.uii.ac.id.
  14. D. Z. Abidin, “Crimes in Information and Communication Technology,” J. Ilm. Media Process., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.stikom-db.ac.id/index.php/processor/article/view/107/105.
  15. A. Josi, Operation System. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2019.
  16. L. F. Al Hakim, “Design and build an automatic salted fish packaging device based on a programable logic controller (plc) zelio,” Dr. Diss. Univ. Muhammadiyah Surabaya, 2021.
  17. S. Mawarti, “Hate Speech Phenomenon The Impact of Hate Speech,” Toler. Media Ilm. Komun. Umat Beragama, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 83, 2018, doi: 10.24014/trs.v10i1.5722.
  18. Y. Pramadi, “Indonesia in the Middle of the Digital Wilderness,” 2020. https://jmb.lipi.go.id/jmb/article/view/1117.
  19. D. Hariyadi and I. Y. Pasa, “Identification of Digital Evidence in Mi Video Application Using Live Forensics Method,” vol. 2018, no. November, pp. 166–172, 2018.
  20. Madcoms, Hang out Friends via Facebook. Yogyakarta: C.V Andi Offset, 2009.
  21. D. Nations, “What is social media? Explaining the big trend,” vol. 30.05, 2017.
  22. A. P. Heriyanto, Mobile Phone Forensics: Theory: Mobile Phone Forensics dan Security Series, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2016.
  23. A. N. Ichsan, “Mobile Forensics on Android-Based IMO Messenger Services Using Digital Forensic Research Workshop Methods Mobile Forensics on Android-Based IMO Messenger Services Using Digital Forensic Research Workshop Methods,” 2020.
  24. Guntur Kondang Prakoso, “Design and build an application for post-classification on local government social media in Indonesia using a Support Vector Machine (SVM),” (Doctoral Diss. Inst. Teknol. Sepuluh Nopember), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 279–288, 2018.
  25. T. Pandela, “Browser Forensics on Web-Based TikTok Applications,” 2020.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Digital Forensics Facebook Cybercrime NIST