CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Perceived Usability of Arabic System Usability Scale (A-SUS): Faculty Members’ Perspective of Smart PAAET Application

by Waheeda Almayyan, Manal Alsuwaidi, Bareeq A. AlGhannam
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 183 - Number 37
Year of Publication: 2021
Authors: Waheeda Almayyan, Manal Alsuwaidi, Bareeq A. AlGhannam
10.5120/ijca2021921757

Waheeda Almayyan, Manal Alsuwaidi, Bareeq A. AlGhannam . Perceived Usability of Arabic System Usability Scale (A-SUS): Faculty Members’ Perspective of Smart PAAET Application. International Journal of Computer Applications. 183, 37 ( Nov 2021), 17-22. DOI=10.5120/ijca2021921757

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2021921757,
author = { Waheeda Almayyan, Manal Alsuwaidi, Bareeq A. AlGhannam },
title = { Perceived Usability of Arabic System Usability Scale (A-SUS): Faculty Members’ Perspective of Smart PAAET Application },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Nov 2021 },
volume = { 183 },
number = { 37 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2021 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 17-22 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume183/number37/32170-2021921757/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2021921757 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:18:54.387465+05:30
%A Waheeda Almayyan
%A Manal Alsuwaidi
%A Bareeq A. AlGhannam
%T Perceived Usability of Arabic System Usability Scale (A-SUS): Faculty Members’ Perspective of Smart PAAET Application
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 183
%N 37
%P 17-22
%D 2021
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The recent past has seen increased usability of computer and mobile phones applications (apps) for education and applied skills services. Nevertheless, the usability of such apps, particularly in languages such as Arabic, remains a concern of theoretical understanding and practical implementation. This study applies the Arabic System Usability Scale (A-SUS) survey in Kuwait to understand the faculty' perspective of utilizing the Smart PAAET, that is an app utilized by the Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (PAAET) with various faculty members of Basic Education, Business Studies, Technological Studies, and Administrative Services. The A-SUS results suggest that the i) Faculties of Business and Technology have relatively higher usability ii) particularly among the faculty of age between 30-39, and iii) having a master qualification. The data is further reduced into two composite components of usability and learnability to explore the current theoretical critique on the factoring structure of SUS. These findings enhance the data theory of SUS in general and A-SUS in particular into an essential area of learning management applications from the faculty perspective.

References
  1. Nuere, S., & de Miguel, L. (2020). The Digital/Technological Connection with COVID-19: An Unprecedented Challenge in University Teaching. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–13.
  2. Blair, I. (2020). Mobile App Download and Usage Statistics (2020). https://buildfire.com/app-statistics/
  3. Gao, M., Kortum, P., & Oswald, F. L. (2020). Multi-Language Toolkit for the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1801173
  4. Lewis, J. R., &Sauro, J. (2017). Revisiting the Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 12(4), 183–192.
  5. Lewis, J. R. (2014). Usability: Lessons Learned. and Yet to Be Learned. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(9), 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.930311
  6. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty’usability. In Usability evaluation in industry (p. 189). CRC press.
  7. De Angeli, A., Athavankar, U., Joshi, A., Coventry, L., & Johnson, G. I. (2004). Introducing ATMs in India: a contextual inquiry. Interacting with Computers, 16(1), 29–44.
  8. Frandsen-Thorlacius, O., Hornbæk, K., Hertzum, M., &Clemmensen, T. (2009). Non-universal usability? A survey of how usability is understood by Chinese and Danish users. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 41–50.
  9. Hsieh, H. C. L. (2011). Exploring the impact of cultures on web usability test. International Conference on Human Centered Design, 47–54.
  10. Jonsson, O., Haak, M., Tomsone, S., Iwarsson, S., Schmidt, S. M., Mårtensson, K., Svensson, T., &Slaug, B. (2016). Cross-National Usability Study of a Housing Accessibility App: Findings From the European InnovAge Project. Journal of Usability Studies, 12(1).
  11. Li, Z. (2014). Critical evaluation of cross-cultural impact on usability studies: analysis and case study data collection. California State University, Northridge.
  12. Mol, M., Van Schaik, A., Dozeman, E., Ruwaard, J., Vis, C., Ebert, D. D., Etzelmueller, A., Mathiasen, K., Moles, B., Mora, T., Pedersen, C. D., Skjøth, M. M., Pensado, L. P., Piera-Jimenez, J., Gokcay, D., Ince, B. Ü., Russi, A., Sacco, Y., Zanalda, E., … Smit, J. H. (2020). Dimensionality of the system usability scale among professionals using internet-based interventions for depression: A confirmatory factor analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02627-8
  13. Walsh, T., Nurkka, P., & Walsh, R. (2010). Cultural differences in smartphone user experience evaluation. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, 1–9.
  14. AlGhannam, B. A., Alsuwaidi, M., & Almayyan, W. (2018). Perceived Usability Using Arabic System Usability Scale ( A-SUS ): Student Perspective of Smart PAAET App. International Journal of Computer Science and InformationSecurity, 16(7), 66–78.
  15. Binyamin, S., Rutter, M., & Smith, S. (2016). the Utilization of System Usability Scale in Learning Management Systems: a Case Study of Jeddah Community College. ICERI2016 Proceedings, 1, 5314–5323. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.2290
  16. Brooke, J. (2018). System usability scale (SUS). Iron and Steel Technology. https://doi.org/10.5948/upo9781614440260.011
  17. AlGhannam, B. A., Albustan, S. A., Al-Hassan, A. A., &Albustan, L. A. (2018). Towards a Standard Arabic System Usability Scale: Psychometric Evaluation using Communication Disorder App. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(9), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1388099
  18. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., & Norman, K. L. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 213–218.
  19. Lewis, J. R., Utesch, B. S., & Maher, D. E. (2015). Measuring Perceived Usability: The SUS, UMUX-LITE, and AltUsability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(8), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1064654
  20. Brajnik, G. (2000). Automatic web usability evaluation: what needs to be done. Proc. Human Factors and the Web, 6th Conference. http://users.dimi.uniud.it/~giorgio.brajnik/papers/hfweb00.html
  21. Al Ghurair, N., &Alnaqi, G. (2020). Schemes of eStories for Children with Social Communication Difficulties. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9530218
  22. Finstad, K. (2006). The system usability scale and non-native English speakers. Journal of Usability Studies, 1(4), 185–188.
  23. Mol, M., Van Schaik, A., Dozeman, E., Ruwaard, J., Vis, C., Ebert, D. D., Etzelmueller, A., Mathiasen, K., Moles, B., Mora, T., Pedersen, C. D., Skjøth, M. M., Pensado, L. P., Piera-Jimenez, J., Gokcay, D., Ince, B. Ü., Russi, A., Sacco, Y., Zanalda, E., … Smit, J. H. (2020). Dimensionality of the system usability scale among professionals using internet-based interventions for depression: A confirmatory factor analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02627-8
  24. Binyamin, S., Rutter, M., & Smith, S. (2016). the Utilization of System Usability Scale in Learning Management Systems: a Case Study of Jeddah Community College. ICERI2016 Proceedings, 1, 5314–5323. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.2290
  25. Glen., S. (2016). Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Test for Sampling Adequacy. https://www.statisticshowto.com/kaiser-meyer-olkin/
  26. Glen., S. (2020). Cronbach’s Alpha_ Simple Definition, Use and Interpretation. https://www.statisticshowto.com/contact/
  27. Putnam, C., Puthenmadom, M., Cuerdo, M. A., Wang, W., & Paul, N. (2020). Adaptation of the System Usability Scale for User Testing with Children. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–7.
  28. Kortum, P., & Peres, S. C. (2014). The relationship between system effectiveness and subjective usability scores using the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(7), 575–584.
  29. Drew, M. R., Falcone, B., &Baccus, W. L. (2018). What does the system usability scale (SUS) measure? International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, 356–366.
  30. Putnam, C., Puthenmadom, M., Cuerdo, M. A., Wang, W., & Paul, N. (2020). Adaptation of the System Usability Scale for User Testing with Children. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–7.
  31. Kortum, P., & Peres, S. C. (2014). The relationship between system effectiveness and subjective usability scores using the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(7), 575–584.
  32. Drew, M. R., Falcone, B., &Baccus, W. L. (2018). What does the system usability scale (SUS) measure? International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, 356–366.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Arabic Applications Usability Scale Education and Training.