CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Analyzing Cervical Cancer by using an Ensemble Learning Approach based on Meta Classifier

by Lipika Barua, Md. Sharif Ahamed, Tania Akter
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 182 - Number 46
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Lipika Barua, Md. Sharif Ahamed, Tania Akter
10.5120/ijca2019918619

Lipika Barua, Md. Sharif Ahamed, Tania Akter . Analyzing Cervical Cancer by using an Ensemble Learning Approach based on Meta Classifier. International Journal of Computer Applications. 182, 46 ( Mar 2019), 29-33. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019918619

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019918619,
author = { Lipika Barua, Md. Sharif Ahamed, Tania Akter },
title = { Analyzing Cervical Cancer by using an Ensemble Learning Approach based on Meta Classifier },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Mar 2019 },
volume = { 182 },
number = { 46 },
month = { Mar },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 29-33 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume182/number46/30462-2019918619/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019918619 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:14:26.391829+05:30
%A Lipika Barua
%A Md. Sharif Ahamed
%A Tania Akter
%T Analyzing Cervical Cancer by using an Ensemble Learning Approach based on Meta Classifier
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 182
%N 46
%P 29-33
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Now a days, cervical cancer is treated as one of the main causes of death of women due to cancer in worldwide. In this study, we collected 741 instances of cervical cancer data, preprocessed data, explored high ranked significant features using different feature selection techniques such as Information Gain (Info. Gain), Gain Ratio, Gini Indexing and X2 and implemented different meta classifier techniques such as Dagging, Additive Regression, CVParameter Selection, MultiScheme, MultiSearch. After that we proposed a new ensemble learning method which is combined with different meta classifier algorithms. Then we found out different evaluation metrics such as Mean Absolute Logarithmic Error (MALE), Root Mean Square Logarithmic Error (RMSLE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) using each of meta classifier algorithms. Later we compared the result of error rate of an proposed algorithm with the error rate result of different meta classifier algorithms and it showed that the proposed algorithm performs as the best classifier to classify these cervical cancer data. This analysis will be helpful to evaluate a performance model for researcher.

References
  1. Dewan Md Farid, Ann Nowe, and Bernard Manderick. Ensemble of trees for classifying high-dimensional imbalanced genomic data. In Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference, pages 172–187. Springer, 2016.
  2. Dewan Md Farid, Mohammad Zahidur Rahman, and Chowdhury Mofizur Rahman. An ensemble approach to classifier construction based on bootstrap aggregation. International Journal of Computer Applications, 25(5):30–34, 2011.
  3. Kelwin Fernandes, Jaime S Cardoso, and Jessica Fernandes. Transfer learning with partial observability applied to cervical cancer screening. In Iberian conference on pattern recognition and image analysis, pages 243–250. Springer, 2017.
  4. Sue J Goldie, Louise Kuhn, Lynette Denny, Amy Pollack, and Thomas C Wright. Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness. Jama, 285(24):3107–3115, 2001.
  5. Seung Hee Ho, Sun Ha Jee, Jong Eun Lee, and Jong Sup Park. Analysis on risk factors for cervical cancer using induction technique. Expert Systems with Applications, 27(1):97–105, 2004.
  6. Jorng-Tzong Horng, Kai-Chih Hu, Li-Cheng Wu, Hsien-Da Huang, Feng-Mao Lin, Shir-Ly Huang, Horn-Cheng Lai, and Ton-Yuen Chu. Identifying the combination of genetic factors that determine susceptibility to cervical cancer. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 8(1):59– 66, 2004.
  7. Xiaoxia Hu, Julie K Schwarz, James S Lewis, Phyllis C Huettner, Janet S Rader, Joseph O Deasy, Perry W Grigsby, and Xiaowei Wang. A microrna expression signature for cervical cancer prognosis. Cancer research, 70(4):1441–1448, 2010.
  8. Sushilkumar Rameshpant Kalmegh. Comparative analysis of weka data mining algorithm randomforest, randomtree and ladtree for classification of indigenous news data. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 5(1):507–517, 2015.
  9. Nisa M Maruthur, Shari D Bolen, Frederick L Brancati, and Jeanne M Clark. The association of obesity and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity, 17(2):375–381, 2009.
  10. Nathalie Reesink-Peters, G Bea A Wisman, Carmen J´eronimo, C Yutaka Tokumaru, Yoram Cohen, Seung Myung Dong, Harrie G Klip, Henk J Buikema, Albert JH Suurmeijer, Harrie Hollema, et al. Detecting cervical cancer by quantitative promoter hypermethylation assay on cervical scrapings: a feasibility study. Molecular Cancer Research, 2(5):289–295, 2004.
  11. R Sankaranarayanan, BM Nene, K Dinshaw, R Rajkumar, S Shastri, R Wesley, P Basu, R Sharma, S Thara, A Budukh, et al. Early detection of cervical cancer with visual inspection methods: a summary of completed and on-going studies in india. salud p´ublica de m´exico, 45(S3):309–407, 2003.
  12. Mark Schiffman, Philip E Castle, Jose Jeronimo, Ana C Rodriguez, and Sholom Wacholder. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. The Lancet, 370(9590):890–907, 2007.
  13. Kuttiannan Thangavel, P Palanichamy Jaganathan, and PO Easmi. Data mining approach to cervical cancer patients analysis using clustering technique. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 5(4):413–417, 2006.
  14. Chih-Jen Tseng, Chi-Jie Lu, Chi-Chang Chang, and Gin- Den Chen. Application of machine learning to predict the recurrence-proneness for cervical cancer. Neural Computing and Applications, 24(6):1311–1316, 2014.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Cervical Cancer Feature Selection Feature Ranking Classification Ensemble learning method