We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Cardiovascular Disease Classification using Photoplethysmography Signals- Survey

by R. Divya, P. T. Vanathi
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 182 - Number 43
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: R. Divya, P. T. Vanathi
10.5120/ijca2019918532

R. Divya, P. T. Vanathi . Cardiovascular Disease Classification using Photoplethysmography Signals- Survey. International Journal of Computer Applications. 182, 43 ( Mar 2019), 10-15. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019918532

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019918532,
author = { R. Divya, P. T. Vanathi },
title = { Cardiovascular Disease Classification using Photoplethysmography Signals- Survey },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Mar 2019 },
volume = { 182 },
number = { 43 },
month = { Mar },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 10-15 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume182/number43/30435-2019918532/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019918532 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:14:07.518416+05:30
%A R. Divya
%A P. T. Vanathi
%T Cardiovascular Disease Classification using Photoplethysmography Signals- Survey
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 182
%N 43
%P 10-15
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In recent years, heart disease has been one of the main causes of death worldwide. Statistics report that around 17 million people die every year due to this disease. Usually the heart disease diagnosis is done using Electrocardiogram (ECG) which is very expensive for the people to afford especially in remote areas. But using Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals it is easier, non-invasive and less expensive in detecting the heart diseases and other abnormalities of human body. So in this paper, various PPG signals usage and their merits are discussed. Also this work focuses on several methods and algorithms of cardiovascular disease (CVD) classification. Several classifier techniques in the field of biomedical signal processing methods are also examined.

References
  1. Lloyd-Jones D.M. 2010. Cardiovascular risk prediction: basic concepts, current status, and future directions. Circulations, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 1768-77.
  2. Damen J.A.A.G, Hooft L, Schuit E et al. 2016. Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review, BMJ, 353:i2416, pp.1-11.
  3. Naghavi M, Libby P and Falk E. 2003. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation, vol. 108, no. 14, pp. 1664-72.
  4. Lin W.H., Zhang H and Zhang Y.T. 2013. Investigation on Cardiovascular risk prediction using physiological parameters. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2013, pp. 1-21.
  5. Paradkar N. S. 2017. Non invasive diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmia, coronary artery disease through fingertip Photoplethysmography, Ph. D Thesis, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad.
  6. Elgendi M. 2012. On the analysis of fingertip photoplethysmogram signals. Current Cardiology Reviews, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 14-25.
  7. Sukor J.A, Redmond S.J and Lovell N.H. 2011. Signal quality measures for pulse oximetry through waveform morphology analysis. Physiological Measurement, vol. 32 no. 3, pp. 369–384.
  8. Gil E, Laguna P, Martinez J, Perez O, Alberola A and Sornmo L. 2013. Heart rate turbulence analysis based on photoplethysmography. Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 3149-3155.
  9. Polanıa L.F, Mestha L. K, Huang D.T and Couderc J.P. 2015. Method for classifying cardiac arrhythmias using photoplethysmography. 37th Annual International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology society, Milan Italy, pp. 6574-7.
  10. Karlen W, Raman, Ansermino J.M, and Dumont G.A. 2013. Multiparameter respiratory rate estimation from the photoplethysmogram. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1946-53.
  11. Jindal V. 2016. Integrating mobile and cloud for PPG signal selection to monitor heart rate during intensive physical exercise. ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems, New York, USA, pp. 36-37.
  12. Ul-Hoque M.A, Ahsan M.D, Mohajan B, 2011. Measurement of blood pressure using photoplethysmography. In: 13th International Conference on Modeling and Simulation, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 32-35.
  13. Mahri N, Beng G. K, and Ali M. A. M. 2012. Best pulse selection of photoplethysmography signal through comparative method. International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Penang, Malaysia, pp. 389-392.
  14. Yousef Q, Reaz M. B. I, Ali M. A. M. 2012. The analysis of PPG morphology: investigating the effects of aging on arterial compliance. Measurement Science Review, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 266-271.
  15. Agro D, Canicatti R, Tomasino A, et al. 2014. PPG Embedded System For Blood Pressure Monitoring. AEIT Annual Conference - From Research to Industry: The Need for a More Effective Technology Transfer, Trieste, Italy, pp. 1-6.
  16. Lopez-Silva S. M, Dotor M. L, Silveira J. P. 2010. Pulse rate measurement from transmittance photoplethysmography in cycle ergometer test. Instrumentation and Measurement Technology IEEE Conference, Austin, TX, USA, pp. 1039 – 1043.
  17. Lin W.H, Zhang H, and Zhang Y.T. 2013. Investigation on cardiovascular risk prediction using physiological parameters. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. vol. 2013, Article ID 27269, pp. 1-21.
  18. Radhimeenakshi S. 2016. Classification and prediction of heart disease risk using data mining techniques of Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network. In: 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development, New Delhi, India, pp. 3107-3111.
  19. Selvaraj N, Jaryal A, Santhoshx J, Deepak K. K and Anand S. 2008. Assessment of heart rate variability derived from finger-tip photoplethysmography as compared to electrocardiography. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 479-84.
  20. Allen J. 2007. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Phsiological Measurement, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1-39.
  21. Allen J, Overbeck K, Stansby G and Murray A. 2006. Photoplethysmography assessments in cardiovascular disease, Measurement & Control, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 80-83.
  22. Shobitha S, Sandhya R, Niranjana Krupa B and Ali M. A. M. 2016. Recognizing cardiovascular risk from photoplethysmogram signals using ELM. 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Computing and Information Processing, Mysore, India, pp. 1-5.
  23. Ukil A, Bandyoapdhyay S, Puri C, Pal A and Mandana K. 2016. Cardiac condition monitoring through photoplethysmogram signal denoising using wearables: Can we detect coronary artery disease with higher performance efficacy? Computing in Cardiology Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 1-4.
  24. Sunil Kumar P, Hari Kumar R. 2015. Performance comparison of EM, MEM, CTM, PCA, ICA, entropy and MI for photoplethysmography Signals. Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 413-418.
  25. Solosenko A, Petreenas A, Marozas V. 2015. Photoplethysmography-based method for automatic detection of premature ventricular contractions. Journal of IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 662-9.
  26. Foo J. Y and Wilson SJ, 2006. A computational system to optimise noise rejection in photoplethysmography signals during motion or poor perfusion states”, International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 140-5.
  27. Das S, Pal S and Mitra M. 2016. Real time heart rate detection from ppg signal in noisy environment. International Conference on Intelligent Control Power and Instrumentation, Kolkata, India, pp. 70-73.
  28. Rubins U, Grube J, Kukulis I. 2008. Photoplethysmography analysis of artery properties in patients with cardiovascular diseases. In 14th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Riga, Latvia, pp. 319-322.
  29. R. Gonzalez, A. Delgado A, J. Padilla, B. Trenor, J. Ferrero, J. Saiz, Photoplethysmographic augmentation index as a non invasive indicator for vascular assessments, Proceedings of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering Springer 22 (2008) 1167-1170.
  30. Manimegalai P, Delpha J and Thanushkodi K. 2012. An early prediction of cardiac risk using augmentation index developed based on a comparative study, International Journal of Computer Applications vol. 49, no. 15, pp. 27-32.
  31. Paradkar N and Chowdhury S. R. 2017. Coronary artery disease detection using photoplethysmography. 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Seogwipo, South Korea, pp. 100-103.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease Heart rate Peak-to-peak interval Photoplethysmography.