We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Program to Determine the Terrain Roughness Index using Path Profile Data Sampled at Different Moving Window Sizes

by Simeon Ozuomba, Henry Johnson Enyenihi, Constance Kalu
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 182 - Number 34
Year of Publication: 2018
Authors: Simeon Ozuomba, Henry Johnson Enyenihi, Constance Kalu
10.5120/ijca2018918289

Simeon Ozuomba, Henry Johnson Enyenihi, Constance Kalu . Program to Determine the Terrain Roughness Index using Path Profile Data Sampled at Different Moving Window Sizes. International Journal of Computer Applications. 182, 34 ( Dec 2018), 34-41. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018918289

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2018918289,
author = { Simeon Ozuomba, Henry Johnson Enyenihi, Constance Kalu },
title = { Program to Determine the Terrain Roughness Index using Path Profile Data Sampled at Different Moving Window Sizes },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2018 },
volume = { 182 },
number = { 34 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2018 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 34-41 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume182/number34/30253-2018918289/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2018918289 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:13:17.881903+05:30
%A Simeon Ozuomba
%A Henry Johnson Enyenihi
%A Constance Kalu
%T Program to Determine the Terrain Roughness Index using Path Profile Data Sampled at Different Moving Window Sizes
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 182
%N 34
%P 34-41
%D 2018
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this paper development of a program to determine the terrain roughness index using path profile data sampled at different moving window sizes is presented. Relevant mathematical expressions and algorithm to determine terrain roughness index from elevation data captured at different moving window sizes are presented. The desktop program is written in Visual Basic for Application. The program enables users to sample the elevation data at a given window size and then determine the terrain roughness parameters at any other window size that is multiple of the original sampling window size. Sample 58.5523249 Km study path location that started at a latitude of 5.48717 and longitude of 7.04193 and ended at a latitude of 5.82096 and a longitude of 7.45042 was used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the software. Specifically, Geocontext online elevation profile software is used on the study path to capture N = 512 path profile data at an initial window size of 3.75 seconds which is equivalent to a distance of 114.5838061 m. The roughness index is computed at four (4) other sampling window sizes of 30 seconds, 1 minute (60 seconds) , 5 minutes (300 seconds) and 10 minutes (600 seconds). Among other things the program showed the window sizes and their corresponding terrain roughness index along with the elevation profile table and graph for each of the sampling window size. The results show that as the widows size increases the total number of sample data points decreases. Also, the largest terrain roughness index value of 52.89 m is observed with window size of 300 seconds whereas the lowest largest terrain roughness index value of 33.55 m is observed with window size of 600 seconds. The idea presented in this paper is useful for wireless network designer who relies on terrain roughness value for the determination of the multipath fade depth for detailed link design.

References
  1. Ellis, T., & Weiss, S. (2018, April). Propagation Prediction for Rail Communications in Urbanized Areas. In 2018 Joint Rail Conference (pp. V001T03A006-V001T03A006). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  2. Reis, S., Pesch, D., Wenning, B. L., & Kuhn, M. (2018, April). Empirical path loss model for 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15. 4 wireless networks in compact cars. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2018 IEEE (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  3. Dove, I. (2014). Analysis of radio propagation inside the human body for in-body localization purposes (Master's thesis, University of Twente).
  4. Parasuraman, R., Kershaw, K., & Ferre, M. (2013). Experimental investigation of radio signal propagation in scientific facilities for telerobotic applications. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 10(10), 364.
  5. Sachdeva, N., & Sharma, D. (2012). Diversity: A fading reduction technique. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, ISSN.
  6. Trenggono, P. P. (2011). Statistical modelling of wind effects on signal propagation for wireless sensor networks (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology).
  7. Sim, C. Y. D. (2002). The propagation of VHF and UHF radio waves over sea paths (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester).
  8. Píšová, P., & Chod, J. (2015). Detection of GNSS signals propagation in urban canyos using 3D city models.
  9. Gibson, J. D. (Ed.). (2012). Mobile communications handbook. CRC press.
  10. Appana, D. K., Kumar, C. A., & Nagappan, N. P. (2009). Channel Estimation in GPRS based Communication System using Bayesian Demodulation.
  11. Miu, A., Tan, G., Balakrishnan, H., & Apostolopoulos, J. (2004, June). Divert: fine-grained path selection for wireless LANs. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services (pp. 203-216). ACM.
  12. Ilcev, S. D. (2011). Surface Reflection and Local Environmental Effects in Maritime and other Mobile Satellite Communications. International Recent Issues about ECDIS, e-Navigation and Safety at Sea: Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 129.
  13. Zhao, X. (2002). Multipath propagation characterization for terrestrial mobile and fixed microwave communications. Helsinki University of Technology.
  14. Hannah, B. M. (2001). Modelling and simulation of GPS multipath propagation (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology).
  15. ITU-R P. 530-17 (2017) ITU-R Recommendation P. 530-17, Propagation data and prediction methods required for the design of terrestrial line-of-sight systems," ITU, Geneva, Switzerland . Available at https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/p/R-REC-P.530-17-201712-I!!PDF-E.pdf. Accessed on November 12, 2018
  16. Mukherjee, S., Mukherjee, S., Garg, R. D., Bhardwaj, A., & Raju, P. L. N. (2013). Evaluation of topographic index in relation to terrain roughness and DEM grid spacing. Journal of earth system science, 122(3), 869-886.
  17. Brubaker, K. M., Myers, W. L., Drohan, P. J., Miller, D. A., & Boyer, E. W. (2013). The use of LiDAR terrain data in characterizing surface roughness and microtopography. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2013.
  18. Deng, Y., Wilson, J. P., & Bauer, B. O. (2007). DEM resolution dependencies of terrain attributes across a landscape. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(2), 187-213.
  19. Göktaş, P., Altvntaş, A., Topçu, S., & Karaşan, E. (2014, August). The effect of terrain roughness in the microwave line-of-sight multipath fading estimation based on Rec. ITU-R P. 530-15. In General Assembly and Scientific Symposium (URSI GASS), 2014 XXXIth URSI (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Multipath Fading Depth Terrain Roughness Index Elevation Profile Geographic Reference System Sampling Window